CORRESP 2 filename2.htm

6

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10/A

(Amendment No.2 to Form10)


GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES

PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OR 12(G) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

[f100predpic001.jpg]

 

PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its charter.)


         

 

 

 

 

 

Nevada

 

000-000-56008

 

90-1139372

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(Commission File Number)

 

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

 

 

2749 2735 Parleys Way, Suite 101205

Salt Lake City, UT 84019

 

 

(Address of principal executive offices.)


Registrant's telephone number: (801) 820-0811

Registrant's fax number: (801) 487-2477

______________________________________


Copies to :

Richard W. Jones, Esq.

Jones & Haley, P.C.

750 Hammond Drive

Building 12, Suite 100



Atlanta, Georgia 30328

(770) 804-0500

www.corplaw.net

 

Securities to be registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:  None

 

Securities to be registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:


Common Stock, $.0010.001

 

 

Title of Class


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company" and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

   

 

 

Large accelerated filer [  ]

Non-accelerated filer [  ]

Emerging growth company [  ]

Accelerated filer [ ]

Smaller reporting company [X]


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]


-1-

TABLE OF CONTENTS

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page

Item 1.

Business

3

 

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

1314

 

 

 

Item 2.

Financial Information

2628

 

 

 

Item 3.

Properties

4045

 

 

 

Item 4.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

4046

 

 

 

Item 5.

Directors and Executive Officers

4248

 

 

 

Item 6.

Executive Compensation

4956

 

 

 

Item 7.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

5563

 

 

 

Item 8

Legal Proceedings

5663

 

 

 

Item 9.

Market Price of Dividends on the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

5663




 

 

 

Item 10.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

5765

 

 

 

Item 11.

Description of Registrant's Securities to be Registered

5967

 

 

 

Item 12.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

6068

 

 

 

Item 13.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

6068

 

 

 

Item 14.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accounting and Financial Disclosures

6068

 

 

 

Item 15.

Financial Statements and Exhibits

6169

 

 

 

 

Signatures

6170



-2-




ITEM 1.  BUSINESS .

 

References in this Form 10 to "Predictive," "we," "us," or "the Company" refer to Predictive Technology Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and, unless the context otherwise requires or is otherwise expressly stated, its subsidiaries.

 

GENERAL

 

Predictive (the Company) was formed in 2005 under the laws of the State of Nevada. The Company is headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, with locations in Utah and Minnesota. We are a therapeutics and life sciences company and a leader in the use of data analytics for disease identification and subsequent therapeutic intervention through precision biopharmaceutical solutions. Through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Predictive Diagnostics, Inc., Predictive Biotech, Inc. Cellsure, L3C, Predictive Laboratories, Inc., Predicitve Therapeutics, Inc.,and through our majority owned subsidiaries equity investment in Juneau Biosciences, LLC and Predictive Therapeutics, Inc., we focus on four main clinical categories: Endometriosis, Scoliosis, Degenerative Disc Disease and Regenerative Human Cell and Tissue Products. In addition to our efforts to advance regenerative medicine, we are committed to assisting women in overcoming the devastating consequences of endometriosis via appropriate early-stage diagnosis and subsequent treatment.

 

PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGIES

 

We are currently offering products in two areas: a genetic diagnostic and prognostic test for endometriosis that is targeted to women who are having trouble with pregnancy; and The products we currently offer are primarily various regenerative medicine products and human cell tissue products (HCT/Ps) for use in regenerative medicine applications. In addition, we are preparing to offer a genetic diagnostic and prognostic test that will be marketed to women that are having difficulty with infertility. We are currently offering the first genetic test through a limited number of Advanced Reproductive Technologies (ART) clinics with groups whom we believe are key opinion leaders in the field. Substantially all of our historical sales relate to our HCT/Ps products.

 

 

Endometriosis Diagnostic

 

Our ARTguide™ test is a proprietary gene test panel for women experiencing infertility as a result of endometriosis and other health concerns. The test is expected to give additional insights into the best course of care related to Advanced Reproductive Technologies (ART)ART, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), that are used to assist couples having fertility issues. ARTguide™ test results are anticipated to enable clinicians to: identify if endometriosis is a potential factor causing or contributing to infertility; efficiently optimize treatment plan selection for patients; reduce unnecessary laparoscopies, but allow for treatment of active endometriosis; minimize out-of-pocket expenses; and improve "take-home baby" rates. For the patient, ARTguide™ will assist with: identification of undetected endometriosis; avoidance of multiple failed IVF cycles; providing an individual plan to achieve higher rates of successful pregnancy; and improvement of ART success rates. Over 30,000 DNA samples and medical records have been collected as part of the development and validation process of ARTguide™.

 

We began a beta launch of our ARTguide™ in October 2018. The beta launch will roll out in certain beta sites over the next few months. We anticipate that the test will be made available to the entire United States in the first second half of 2019. We are currently processing ARTguide™ in a contracted CLIA laboratory and we anticipate processing the test in our own recently acquired laboratory in Salt Lake City, Utah, once appropriate certifications are received.

 

Endometriosis affects an estimated one in ten women of reproductive age. See, for example, [ Macer, et. al, "Endometriosis and Infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility" Obstet Gynecol Clin - Dec. 2012 ] Endometriosis occurs when the tissue similar to the lining of the uterus (womb) is found in other parts of the body, most commonly in the pelvis. Monthly bleeding and inflammation caused by these lesions may severely impact a woman's quality of life. Some affected women experience severe pain,



infertility, and/or problems with their periods, while some have no symptoms at all. Today, definitive diagnosis requires surgery. Due to the difficulties, invasiveness, and expense of diagnosing the condition, the majority of women diagnosed with endometriosis suffer for over a decade before receiving treatment. Treatment may involve hormonal suppression or a targeted destruction of the abnormal tissue during surgery.

 


-3-




Our ARTguide™ test was developed by Juneau Biosciences, LLC. We currently own just over under fifty percent of Juneau. We have an exclusive license with Juneau to market Juneau's patented molecular diagnostics for use in the prognosis and monitoring of endometriosis in the infertility and pelvic pain markets.

 

ARTguide™ Exclusive License

 

In 2015 we entered into an exclusive license agreement for the commercialization of the ARTguide™ test and related services for the prognosis and monitoring of endometriosis. The license agreement was amended and restated in March 2018. Under the license, as amended, (i) upon the commercial sale of the rights to the ARTguide™ or a license thereof we are required to issue to Juneau common stock with a market value of $2,500,000, (ii) we split net profits earned from the ARTguide™ evenly between Predictive and Juneau, (iii) we must have minimum sales of $12.5 million in the twelve month period beginning nine months after commercial launch, (iv) during the second year following launch we must have minimum sales of $30 million, and (v) during the third year following launch and each year thereafter we must have minimum annual sales of $60 million. If we fail to meet these metrics the license is null and void unless Predictive (a) presents written plan to Juneau describing how Predictive will use reasonable commercial efforts to improve sales and (b) Predictive agrees to spend an amount equal to the difference between the projected minimum sales and actual sales on an enhanced sales and marketing effort over the next year.


Regenerative Medicine Products


We founded our life sciences business in 2015. We are a leader in regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps. A growing national network of clinics, health systems, researchers and physicians leverage our placental-derived and Wharton's Jelly umbilical cord-derived products. Regenerative medicine plays an important role in the medical community and care continuum. By using regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps to create an optimal internal healing environment, it gives patients and professionals new treatment options that were not available just a few years ago.

 

In the emerging field of regenerative medicine, we are focused on tissue processing protocol. The power of our products is in their functionality, but just like all harvested tissue, that functionality can diminish if the tissue is not properly handled. This is why we process all of our products in our Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") registered cGMP/cCTP lab utilizing proprietary methods that reduce the loss of important scaffolding proteins, growth factors, cytokines and other properties. In our ISO Class 7 clean room, we cryogenically freeze the products to better preserve viability. Our products are derived from two tissue sources -- the Wharton's Jelly layer of the umbilical cord, as well as placental tissue. Our products are uniquely able to help protect, cushion and support injured parts of the body, as well as aid the optimal regenerative environment. Our products are ethically sourced from donated birthing tissues, such as umbilical cords and placentas from full-term deliveries. Comprehensive medical and social histories of the donor are obtained and tissues are procured, processed, and tested to meet or exceed standards established by FDA. Through rigorous research, we have identified the Wharton's jelly layer of the umbilical cord, as well as placental tissue to be the richest a rich sources of regenerative properties. It is from these two sources that we derive our products, each containing a unique blend of cytokines, proteins, growth factors and scaffolding properties: the functional factors involved in the reconstruction, repair, and protection of human tissue.

 

Our four main products include AmnioCyte TM AmnioCyteTM, AmnioCyte Plus TM PlusTM, PolyCyteTM, PolyCyte TM , and CoreCyte TM CoreCyteTM. AmnioCyte TM  AmnioCyteTM and AmnioCyte Plus™ are derived from amniotic fluid. PolyCyte TM PolyCyteTM is derived from the Wharton's Jelly of the umbilical cord. CoreCyte TM CoreCyteTM is a minimally manipulated human tissue allograft derived from the Wharton's Jelly of the umbilical cord. CoreCyte TM CoreCyteTM is processed to preserve the structural integrity of Wharton's jelly for homologous use and is cryogenically preserved.

-4-

Virtually all the revenues earned to date are derived from the sales of Regenerative Medicine Products/HCT/Ps.  The percentage of revenues from each product for July 1, 2017 to March 31, 2019 are broken out in the table below:

   

 

 

For period July 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018

Percent of total revenue by product type

CoreCyte™

   76.44%

PolyCyte™

      10.95%

AmnioCyte+™

      7.74%

AmnioCyte™

      4.45%

Other

0.42%

Total

100%

PRODUCTS IN DEVELOPMENT

 

Background - Molecular Diagnostics

We believe that advances in the emerging field of molecular diagnostics will improve our ability to determine which patients are subject to a greater risk of developing disease, and who therefore would benefit from preventive therapies. Molecular diagnostic products may also guide a patient's healthcare to ensure the patient receives the most appropriate drug at the optimal dose. Every week, disease-linked genetic variations are being discovered. Genetic tests are now available for over 4,000 diseases and conditions. Once only a niche market of the in vitro diagnostics industry, molecular genetic testing is playing an increasingly valuable and prominent role in health care. In all areas of medicine, DNA based tests are assisting clinicians in the management of diseases and in the selection of treatment by enabling earlier diagnosis or prediction of disease risk years before symptoms occur. The domestic market for molecular diagnostics is a multi-billion dollar market and is the strongest segment of the entire in vitro diagnostics market, growing at an annual average rate of over 20%.

We believe there are significant diagnostic market opportunities for disease identification. Simple, non-invasive diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive tests do not exist for many of the major diseases affecting women and men. Unlike traditional medical tests, molecular genetic tests are often proprietary, high-margin tests that can move quickly from discovery to commercialization, particularly when performed at a centralized laboratory under the FDA "home-brew" exemption for LDT.laboratory developed tests (LDTs).


-5-

 

In general, accurate early detection, disease identification and assessment of health status can translate into reduced morbidity, improved quality of life and reduced treatment costs associated with detection and treatment of disease during later stages.

 

Technology and Products in Development

 

Our majority-owned subsidiary, Juneau Biosciences, LLC has established a core team of physicians and scientists as well as state-of-the-art genetic analysis technologies to identify disease-associated genes in the field of women's health using clinical genetics. Juneau has the medical and patient resources which many biotechnology companies lack in disease areas of interest to Predictive. Based in Utah, Juneau's clinical network accesses the millions of living descendants of the original pioneers who settled in this region. Juneau believes that these large, genetically heterogeneous families who are well informed of their genealogy, comprise the best population in the world for discovering human disease genes. In short, Juneau believes that it can move from clinical need to clinical trials more efficiently than many other companies.



 

We recently acquired DNA and ancestry assets, including significant genetic data related to women's diseases and degenerative disc disease. The acquired assets include: (i) approximately 1,000 degenerative disc disease-related DNA samples, related family records, relevant clinical records (including approximately 600 affected probands) and 800 ancestry matched control samples, (ii) whole exome sequencing data on approximately 300 degenerative disc disease samples, over 800 local controls, and published reference populations, together with initial analysis of the markers, and (iii) exclusive use of a DNA biobank that has collected over 300,000 samples for multiple diseases that the Company may target.  

 

The acquisition of these DNA and ancestry assets strengthens our development platforms to commercialize gene-based diagnostics and biotechnology treatments for other debilitating diseases, such as additional difficult-to-diagnose women's health diseases and degenerative disc disease. These assets are complementary to our recent acquisition of Inception Dx, LLC, which is anticipated to act as our laboratory once certifications are completed, which included ancestry database records for over 31.9 million individuals for use in genetics research. 

In the future, Predictive intends to develop additional diagnostics and therapeutics utilizing the development assets described above.  In the near-term, the Company will focus its resources on commercializing the ARTguide™, existing regenerative medicine products and improvements to existing commercialized products.


-5-6-

Tissue Availability and Laboratory Processing

 

Our regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps are derived from the Wharton's Jelly layer of the umbilical cord and from placental tissue. We obtain these tissues from donors in various parts of the country. Tissues are procured, processed, and tested in our laboratory in Salt Lake City, Utah to meet or exceed standards established by FDA. We are dependent on donors to supply us with sufficient umbilical cord and placental tissue to manufacture our four key regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps. To date, we have been able to secure sufficient donated tissues to meet our manufacturing needs. In the event we are not able to secure required tissue, it will directly impact the quantity of regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps that we are able to manufacture.

 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

 

In striving to protect and enhance proprietary technology, inventions, and improvements that are commercially important to the development of our business, we currently rely heavily on trade secrets relating to our proprietary technology platform and on know-how. We enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and contractors. We also seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data and trade secrets by maintaining physical security of our premises and physical and electronic security of our information technology systems.

 

Our objective is to continue to expand our portfolio of patents and patent applications, in conjunction with our trade secrets and know-how, in order to further protect our molecular diagnostic, therapeutics, regenerative medicine platform and derivative technologies, as well as the manufacturing and deployment processes of those technologies.

 

Intellectual Property Related to Endometriosis

 

Related to the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis, we own 2 issued U.S. patents that begin to expire in 2033, 1 allowed U.S. patent, 1 pending U.S. non-provisional patent application, and national phase applications have been entered in 5 foreign countries. In the field of the prediction, prognosis, or diagnosis or therapeutic assessment of endometriosis in infertility and/or pelvic pain and/or dysmenorrhea patients using genetic data, we have exclusive license rights to 3 issued U.S. patents, 3 pending U.S. non-provisional patent applications, 13 pending U.S. provisional patent applications, and 1 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT ) International Patent Application.

 

Intellectual Property Related to Spine Diseases



 

Related to the diagnosis and treatment of spine diseases, we own 5 issued U.S. patents that begin to expire in 2026 and 1 pending U.S. non-provisional patent application.

 

Intellectual Property Related to Regenerative Medicine Products and HCT/Ps

 

Related to the processing of human cell tissue, we own 2 pending U.S. provisional patent applications.

 

REIMBURSEMENT

 

Our ARTguide™ and current regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps are targeted as self-pay markets and, to date, substantially all of our revenues are self-pay. To the extend extent ARTguide™, our current regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps or any future products and/or future services we offer are reimbursed such transactions are will be subject to additional regulation. In addition, in the United States, demand for access to many medical products will depend in large part on both the availability and the amount of reimbursement from third-party payers, including government healthcare programs (including Medicare and Medicaid), and commercial healthcare insurers, including managed care organizations and other private health plans. Third-party payers have complex rules and requirements for coverage and reimbursement of healthcare products and services. Even the applications to such third-party payers to be eligible for reimbursement for product or services are complex and can be lengthy and time consuming. For new technologies coming to market, these payers are increasingly examining the clinical evidence supporting medical necessity and cost effectiveness decisions in addition to safety and efficacy, which can result in barriers to early coverage reimbursement, or denial of coverage and reimbursement altogether. Accordingly, significant uncertainty exists as to the availability of coverage and reimbursement status for new medical products. If third-party payer reimbursement is unavailable to our customer hospitals, physicians, and providers, our sales may be limited and we may not be able to realize an appropriate return on our investment in research and product development.




-6-7-

Payers often set payment rates depending on the site of service and many use the Medicare program as a benchmark for their own payment methodologies. In the hospital inpatient setting, Medicare payment generally is set at pre-determined rates for all products and services provided during a particular patient stay and is based on such factors as the patient diagnosis, procedures performed, patient age, and complications. In the physician office or clinic setting, Medicare payment generally is based on a fee schedule, with payment rates set for each procedure performed and product used, although the schedule may in some instance bundle the product into the payment for the procedure. In some outpatient settings, such as in the case of the hospital outpatient clinic setting, Medicare payment rates generally are premised on classifications of services that have similar clinical characteristics and similar costs.

 

Reimbursement policies depend in part on legislation designed to regulate the healthcare industry and federal and state governments continue to propose and pass new healthcare legislation and government agencies revise or change their regulations and policies from time to time. We cannot predict whether or how such reform measures and policy changes would affect reimbursement rates and demand for our products.

 

COMPETITION

Competition is intense in diagnostic, regenerative medicine products, and HCT/Ps markets. Our potential competitors in the United States and abroad are numerous and include, among others, major pharmaceutical companies, diagnostic reference laboratories, biotechnology firms, universities and other research institutions. Many potential competitors have greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we have. We expect competition to intensify in our current fields as technical advances occur and become more widely known.



 

The technologies for (i) discovering genes that cause major diseases, (ii) methods, processes and discoveries related to HCT/Ps, and (iii) approaches for commercializing those discoveries are rapidly evolving. Rapid technological developments could result in our services, products, or processes becoming obsolete before we recover a significantportion significant portion of our related research and development costs and associated capital expenditures. If we do not launch our services or products before our competitors, we could be adversely affected. Moreover, any products that we develop could be made obsolete by less expensive or more effective tests or methods that may be developed in the future.

 

We believe, however, based on extensive literature and patent searches, that we have far surpassed other research in endometriosis. We further believe that we are one of a few commercial enterprises currently engaged in a genomic approach to endometriosis. There are a number of established pharmaceutical companies that have franchises in the women's health area. These include: AbbVie, Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca, Teva/ Barr Laboratories, Bayer Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline, Neurocrine, Merck Novartis Corporation / Serono, Procter & Gamble, Pfizer, Inc. /Wyeth, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Aventis, and others. These companies are principally focused in the areas of HRTHormone Replacement Therapy (HRT), contraception, osteoporosis and/or infertility based on their existing products and R&D pipeline. We view these companies as potential partners. Our gene discovery and target validation technologies will create a natural "fit" between our capabilities and large pharmaceutical companies' chemical libraries, preclinical/clinical development, and sales and marketing capabilities.




-7-8-

We face significant competition in the regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps market. Our competitors include Alliqua, American Cryo, Athersys, AxoGen, Biodesix, Biotime, Burst Biologics, Compugen, DermaSciences, Human Regenerative Technologies, International Stem Cell, Invitrix, Lifecell, Liveyon, Longeveron, MiMeDx, Misoblast, MTF (Musculoskeletal Tissue Foundation), Orthofix, Osiris, Pluristem, Polarity, Regenerexx, TEI Biosciences, TissueTech, Wright, and Xtant, Myovant, and Obseva . We believe that our HCT/Ps processing and preserving technologies deliver superior products and provide us with a competitive edge over other industry playersparticipants.

 

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

 

General

 

Regulation by governmental authorities in the United States and foreign countries is a significant factor in the development, manufacture and marketing of our products and services and in our ongoing research and development activities. The therapeutic products, and some of the molecular diagnostic products, regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps to be developed, will require regulatory approval by governmental agencies prior to commercialization. Various federal statutes and regulations also govern or influence the testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage, record keeping, and marketing of therapeutic products, regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps. The process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and regulations require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Any failure by us or our collaborators, licensors or licensees to obtain regulatory approval or any delay in obtaining regulatory approval could have a material adverse affect on our business.

 

Molecular Diagnostics

 

The contracted Our laboratory that is running ARTguide™ and our laboratory that will be running ARTguide™ and our future molecular diagnostic tests is subject to governmental regulation at the federal, state, and local levels as a



clinical laboratory. The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments, or CLIA, provide for the regulation of clinical laboratories by the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS"), and our diagnostic laboratory is subject to HHS regulations, which mandate that all clinical laboratories be certified to perform testing on human specimens and provide specific conditions for certification. These regulations also contain guidelines for the qualification, responsibilities, training, working conditions and oversight of clinical laboratory employees. In addition, specific standards are imposed for each type of test that is performed in a laboratory. CLIA and the regulations promulgated thereunder are enforced through quality inspections of test methods, equipment, instrumentation, materials and supplies on a periodic basis. Any change in CLIA or these regulations or in the interpretation thereof could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

The FDA has regulatory responsibility over instruments, test kits, reagents and other medical devices used to perform diagnostic testing by clinical laboratories. In the past, the FDA has claimed regulatory authority over laboratory developed tests (LDTs), but has exercised "enforcement discretion" in not regulating most LDTs performed by high complexity CLIA-certified laboratories and that are marketed to physicians.

 

The FDA published draft guidance documents regulating LDTs. It is anticipated that regulation, if it occurs, will commence with high risk tests and proceed to low risk tests over time. If the FDA should require that our tests receive FDA approval prior to their commercial launch, there can be no assurance such approval would be received on a timely basis, if at all. At present, ARTguide™ does not require FDA approval before commercial launch.

 

The FDA has considered LDT regulations since 1992. Any attempt by the FDA to regulate LDTs now would be controversial, difficult to administer and likely to trigger legal challenges from the industry. A large number of medical laboratory tests are LDTs that have been in use for decades, are run daily in labs throughout the country, and enjoy broad clinical acceptance. FDA regulation of the entire menu of tests that currently fall under the legal definition of LDTs would be disruptive to patient care. Requiring regularly used and long-accepted LDTs to have FDA approval would drive health care costs up.


-8-9-

LDTs are in vitro assays that clinical laboratories develop as testing services according to their own procedures. These tests are often created in response to unmet clinical needs, and are commonly used for early and precise diagnosing, monitoring, and guiding patient treatment. LDTs are also used to diagnose and assess diseases and disorders for which no FDA-authorized test kit currently exists, such as rare diseases, or those with small patient populations. In some cases, LDTs represent the standard of care. The ability of laboratories to develop custom diagnostic tests has been critical to the growth of personalized medicine and to keep pace with the changing face of disease. disease.



 

Medical laboratories are highly regulated under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of 1988. High complexity laboratories must undergo additional certification to ensure the clinical validity of tests. CLIA regulations address personnel qualifications, quality control procedures, and proficiency testing programs. CLIA contains different complexity categories to describe the degree of expertise a laboratory will be required to have, and the standards that it will need to meet, in order to perform a particular test of a given type. All laboratories performing molecular diagnostic testing must be CLIA High Complexity Laboratories.

 

Greater than 95% of current and greater than 95% of new high margin tests are performed as LDTs. Molecular test development by laboratories under CLIA has become the diagnostic or prognostic standard of care for many diseases or conditions.  Under CLIA, the laboratory director, without external review, determines the analytical validity of LDTs. The laboratory is not required by CLIA to demonstrate that the test is clinically valid. The laboratory must develop the test itself and must "manufacture" the test. The laboratory performing the test must have CLIA approval and approval of any state regulators.

 



Typically molecular genetics laboratories have accreditation from the College of American Pathologists ("CAP") and generally the lab director meets professional certification requirements. Some states have implemented regulations concerning molecular diagnostic testing that require licensing or registration of general clinical laboratory activities.

 

We believe that we will be able to take all steps required in various jurisdictions in order for us to conduct business in those jurisdictions. Failure to maintain state regulatory compliance, or changes in state regulatory schemes, could result in a substantial curtailment or even prohibition of our clinical activities and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Human Cell and Tissue Products (HCT/Ps)

 

The FDA has specific regulations governing the manufacture and commercialization of HCT/Ps and the level of these regulations by the FDA, depending on whether the procedure falls solely within the scope of Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (the "PHS Act") (42 U.S.C. § 264) or if they are regulated as drugs, devices, and/or biological products under Section 351 of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. § 262) and/or the FD&C Act.

 

If an HCT/P meets the criteria for regulation solely under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (so-called "361 HCT/Ps"), no premarket FDA review for safety and effectiveness under a drug, device, or biological product marketing application is required. However, the processor of the tissue is required to register and list its products with the FDA, comply with regulations regarding labeling, record keeping, donor eligibility and screening and testing, process the tissue in accordance with established current Good Tissue Practices (cGTP), and investigate and, in certain circumstances, report adverse events or deviations.

 

To be a Section 361 HCT/P, a product generally must meet all four of the following criteria:




-9-10-

1)  It must be minimally manipulated;

2)  It must be intended for homologous use;

3)  Its manufacture must not involve combination with another article, except for water, crystalloids or a sterilizing, preserving or storage agent, provided the addition of such article does not raise new clinical safety concerns; and

4)  It must not have a systemic effect and must not be dependent upon the metabolic activity of living cells for its primary function (unless the product is intended for reproductive use, autologous use, or use in a first- or second-degree blood relative).

 

We have successfully completed an FDA audit, and management believes our structural umbilical cord tissue product qualify as Section 361 HCT/Ps. Other regenerative medicine products and product candidates that we have developed or have commercialized are being evaluated with respect to regulatory classification. We plan to prepare for any regulatory pathway that is required.  Other HCT/Ps we are developing are being evaluated with respect to regulatory classification, and we will prepare for any pathway of manufacturing or regulation that is required.

 

All establishments that manufacture Section 361 HCT/Ps must register and list their HCT/Ps with the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research ("CBER") within five days after commencing operations. In addition, establishments are required to update their registration annually in December or within 30 days of certain changes, and submit changes in HCT/P listing at the time of or within six months of such change. Establishments that manufacture Section 361 HCT/Ps will know that they are registered in compliance with 21 C.F.R. § 1271.10(a) when they receive a validated form with the registration number ("FEI#") after submitting the Form FDA 3356 (registration form).  Applicable GTP requirements govern, the facilities, controls, and methods used in the



manufacture of HCT/Ps, including without limitation, recovery, donor screening, donor testing, processing, storage, labeling, packaging, and distribution of 361 HCT/Ps. FDA inspection and enforcement with respect to establishments described in 21 C.F.R. § 1271 includes inspections conducted, as deemed necessary, to determine compliance with the applicable provisions and may include, but is not limited to, an assessment of the establishment's facilities, equipment, finished and unfinished materials, containers, processes, HCT/Ps, procedures, labeling, records, files, papers, and controls required to be maintained under 21 C.F.R. § 1271. Such inspections can occur at any time with or without written notice at such frequency as is determined by the FDA in its sole discretion.

 

Our subsidiary, Predictive Biotech, successfully completed an FDA inspection of its lab in October 2018. This inspection included the review of all of the Company's SOPs, manufacturing processes and marketing material. The Company resolved and reported back to the FDA on 2 items that were identified on the FDA's standard 483 form. The Company is currently listed on the FDA's database as a Company in good standing under the status of "No Action Indicated (NAI)".

 

We believe that we are operating our HCT/Ps business in compliance with applicable FDA regulations and other applicable laws.

 

Therapeutics

 

We intend to partner with one or more pharmaceutical partners to develop therapeutic products which will be subject to regulation by the FDA and require approval before they may be clinically tested and commercially marketed for human therapeutic use in the United States and other countries. The precise regulatory requirements with which we will have to comply are undergoing periodic revisions and refinement.

 

The steps required before a therapeutic product may be marketed in the United States are numerous and include, but are not limited to the following:

 

- completion of preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies, chemical process development, and formulation studies;

- the submission to the FDA of an IND, which must become effective before clinical trials may commence;

- performance of adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the drug for its intended use;

- the submission of a New Drug Application, or NDA, to the FDA; and

- FDA approval of the NDA, including approval of all product labeling and initial advertising.


-10-11-

The testing and approval process required to market a therapeutic product involves substantial time, effort, and financial resources and we cannot be certain that any approvals for any of our future therapeutic products will be granted on a timely basis, if at all.

 

Clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential Phases that may overlap:

 

- PHASE 1: Initial safety study in healthy human subjects or patients where the candidate therapy is tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion.

 



- PHASE 2: Studies in a limited patient population designed to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to determine the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases and to determine tolerance and optimal dosage.

 

- PHASE 3: Studies in an expanded patient population to further evaluate clinical efficacy and to further test for safety.

 


We cannot be certain that we will successfully complete Phase 1, Phase 2 or Phase 3 testing of any compound within any specific time period, if at all. Furthermore, the FDA or the sponsor may suspend clinical trials at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk.

 

Satisfaction of the above FDA requirements or similar requirements of state, local and foreign regulatory agencies typically takes several years and the actual time required may vary substantially, based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product or indication. Government regulation may delay or prevent marketing of potential products for a considerable period of time and impose costly procedures upon us or our partners' activities. The FDA or any other regulatory agency may not grant any approvals on a timely basis, if at all. Success in early stage clinical trials does not assure success in later stage clinical trials. Data obtained from clinical activities is not always conclusive and may be susceptible to varying interpretations that could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Even if a product receives regulatory approval, the approval may be significantly limited to specific indications and dosages. Delays in obtaining, or failures to obtain regulatory approvals may have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we cannot predict what adverse governmental regulations may arise from future U.S. or foreign governmental action.

 

Any products manufactured or distributed by us pursuant to FDA approval is subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA, including record-keeping requirements and reporting of adverse experiences with the drug. Drug manufacturers and their subcontractors are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA to assess compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices, which impose certain procedural and documentation requirements upon us and our third-party manufacturers. We cannot be certain that we or our suppliers will be able to comply with current Good Manufacturing Practices regulations and other FDA regulatory requirements.

 

Fraud, Abuse and False Claims

 

We are directly and indirectly subject to various federal and state laws governing relationships with healthcare providers and other potential referral sources for our products pertaining to healthcare fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback, false claims, and similar laws. In addition, federal and state laws are also sometimes open to interpretation. We could potentially face legal risks if our interpretation differs from those of enforcement authorities. Further, from time to time we may find that we are at a competitive disadvantage if our interpretation differs from that of our competitors.


 

-12-

In particular, the federal healthcare program Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration (in cash or in kind), directly or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce either the referral of an individual, or the furnishing, arranging for, or recommending of, a good or service for which payment may be made in whole or part under federal healthcare programs, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Penalties for violations include criminal penalties and civil sanctions such as fines, imprisonment and possible exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. The Anti-Kickback Statute is broad and prohibits many arrangements and practices that are lawful in businesses outside of the healthcare industry. In implementing the statute, the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ("OIG") has issued a series of regulations, known as the "safe harbors." These safe harbors set forth provisions that, if all their applicable requirements are met, exclude certain specified remuneration and



remunerative arrangements from being violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute. The failure of a transaction or arrangement to fit precisely within one or more safe harbors does not necessarily mean that it is illegal or that prosecution will be pursued. However, conduct and business arrangements that do not fully satisfy each applicable element of a safe harbor may result in increased scrutiny by Government enforcement authorities, such as the OIG. Many states have laws similar to the federal law.

-11-




Also, the federal civil False Claims Act ("FCA") imposes civil liability on any person or entity that submits, or causes the submission of, a false or fraudulent claim to the U.S. government. Damages under the FCA can be significant and consist of the imposition of fines and penalties. The FCA also allows a private individual or entity (i.e., a whistleblower) with knowledge of past or present fraud against the federal government to sue on behalf of the government and to be paid a portion of the government's recovery, which can include both civil penalties and up to three times the amount of the government's damages (usually the amount reimbursed by federal healthcare programs). The DOJ takes the position that the marketing and promotional practices of life sciences product manufacturers, including the off-label promotion of products, the provision of inaccurate or misleading reimbursement guidance, or the payment of prohibited kickbacks, may cause the submission of improper claims to federal and state healthcare entitlement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid by health care providers that use the manufacturer's products, which results in a violation of the FCA. In certain cases, manufacturers have entered into criminal and civil settlements with the federal government under which they entered into plea agreements, paid substantial monetary amounts and entered into corporate integrity agreements ("CIAs") that require, among other things, substantial government oversight, as well as reporting and remedial actions going forward

 

If we fail to comply with these laws, we could be subject to enforcement actions, including but not limited to:

 

- Multi-year investigations by federal and state governments;

- Criminal - Criminal and civil fines and penalties;

- Obligations under settlement agreements, such as CIAs or Deferred Prosecution Agreements; and/or

- Exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs. 

 

Other Regulations

 

In 1996, Congress passed the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA. HIPAA, among other things, required HHS to issue regulations that are designed to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the healthcare system by facilitating the transfer of health information along with protecting the confidentiality and security of health information. Specifically, Title II of HIPAA, the Administrative Simplification Act, contains four provisions that address the privacy of health data, the security of health data, the standardization of identifying numbers used in the healthcare system and the standardization of data content, codes and formats used in healthcare transactions. We are currently subject to the HIPAA regulations and maintain an active program designed to address regulatory compliance issues. Penalties for non-compliance with HIPAA include both civil and criminal penalties. Violations could result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per type of violation in each calendar year and criminal penalties of up to $250,000 per violation.


 

-13-

The privacy regulations protect medical records and other personal health information by limiting their use and release, giving patients the right to access their medical records and limiting most disclosures of health information to the minimum amount necessary to accomplish an intended purpose. In addition to the federal privacy regulations, there are a number of state laws regarding the confidentiality of health information that are applicable to clinical laboratories. The penalties for violation of state privacy laws may vary widely and new privacy laws in this area are pending. We believe that we have taken the steps required of us to comply with all applicable health information privacy and confidentiality statutes and regulations. Failure to maintain compliance, or changes in state or federal laws regarding privacy, could result in civil and/or criminal penalties and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

HHS has regulations which establish standards for electronic transactions and for code sets to be used in those transactions. They also contain requirements concerning the use of these standards by health plans, healthcare clearinghouses, and certain healthcare providers. In addition, HHS has security regulations which establish standards for the security of electronic protected health information to be implemented by health plans, healthcare



clearinghouse, and certain healthcare providers. We believe we has taken the steps required of it to comply with both the transactions and code sets as well as the security regulations. However, failure to maintain compliance with these regulations could result in civil and/or criminal penalties and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Our business is also subject to regulation under state and federal laws regarding environmental protection and hazardous substances control, such as the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Environmental Protection Act, and the Toxic Substance Control Act. We believe that we are in material compliance with these and other applicable laws and that the costs of our ongoing compliance will not have a material adverse effect on our business. However, statutes or regulations applicable to our business may be adopted which could impose substantial additional costs to assure compliance and/or otherwise materially and adversely affect our operations.

 

EMPLOYEES

 

We had 63 106 full-time employees and 5 8 part-time employees as of December 1May 20, 2018 2019.

 

-12-




ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS .

 

The following risks and uncertainties are important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements. The factors described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations and results.  If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.  As a result, the market price of shares of our Common Stock could decline significantly.


 

-14-


This Registration Statement includes management's best current estimate of the future potential of the business. Investors should be aware that this business has inherent risks that must be fully evaluated, discussed with management and experts fully capable of interpreting the information prior to any investment.

 

Risks Relating to our Business and Industry Generally

 

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control.

 

We are subject to the following factors, among others, that may negatively affect our operating results:


       

-

  The announcement or introduction of new products by our competitors;

-

  Failure of Government and private health plans to adequately and timely reimburse the users of our products;

-

  Our ability to upgrade and develop our systems and infrastructure to accommodate growth;

-

  Our ability to attract and retain key personnel in a timely and cost-effective manner;

-

  The amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to the expansion of our business, operations and infrastructure;

-

  Regulation by federal, state or local Governments; and

-

  General economic conditions as well as economic conditions specific to the healthcare industry.

 

We have based our current and future expense levels largely on our investment plans and estimates of future events, although certain of our expense levels are, to a large extent, fixed. We may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, any significant shortfall in revenue relative to our planned expenditures would have an immediate adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.  Further, as a strategic response to changes in the competitive environment, we may from time to time make certain pricing, service or marketing decisions that could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.  Due to the foregoing factors, our revenue and operating results are and will remain difficult to forecast.

 

We are in a highly competitive and evolving field and face competition from well-established tissue processors, genetic testing laboratories and medical device manufacturers, as well as new market entrants.


 

-15-

Our business is in a very competitive and evolving field. Competition from other tissue processors, genetic testing laboratories, medical device companies and from research and academic institutions is intense, expected to increase, subject to rapid changeand could be significantly affected by new product introductions. In addition, consolidation in the healthcare industry continues to lead demands for price concessions or to the exclusion of some suppliers from certain of our markets, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial



condition. The presence of this competition in our market may lead to pricing pressure, which would make it more difficult to sell our products at a price that will make us profitable or prevent us from selling our products at all. Our failure to compete effectively would have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

-13-




Rapid technological change could cause our products to become obsolete and if we do not enhance our product offerings through our research and development efforts, we may be unable to effectively compete.

 

The technologies underlying our products are subject to rapid and profound technological change. Competition intensifies as technical advances in each field are made and become more widely known. We can give no assurance that others will not develop services, products, or processes with significant advantages over the products, services, and processes that we offer or are seeking to develop. Any such occurrence could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

We plan to enhance and broaden our product offerings in response to changing customer demands and competitive pressure and technologies. The success of any new product offering or enhancement to an existing product will depend on numerous factors, including our ability to:

   

 

 

-

Properly identify and anticipate physician and patient needs;

-

Develop and introduce new products or product enhancements in a timely manner;

-

Adequately protect our intellectual property and avoid infringing upon the intellectual property rights of third parties;

-

Demonstrate the safety and efficacy of new products; and 

-

Obtain the necessary regulatory clearances or approvals for new products or product enhancements.

 

If we do not develop and, when necessary, obtain regulatory clearance or approval for new products or product enhancements in time to meet market demand, or if there is insufficient demand for these products or enhancements, our results of operations will suffer. Our research and development efforts may require a substantial investment of time and resources before we are adequately able to determine the commercial viability of a new product, technology, material or other innovation. In addition, even if we are able to successfully develop enhancements or new generations of our products, these enhancements or new generations of products may not produce sales in excess of the costs of development and they may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing customer preferences or the introduction by our competitors of products embodying new technologies or features.

-14-16-

We are subject to numerous federal and state healthcare laws regulations, and a failure to comply with such laws and regulations could have an adverse effect on our business and our ability to compete in the marketplace.

If we fail to comply with the FDA regulations and laws applicable to our operation or tissue products, the FDA could take enforcement action, including, without limitation, pursuing any of the following sanctions, among others:

 

- Untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, product seizures, and civil penalties;

- Orders for product retention, recall, and/or destruction;

- Operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of operations;

- Refusing any requests for product clearance or approval;

- Withdrawing or suspending any applications for approval or approvals already granted; and/or

- Criminal prosecution.

 

In addition, there are numerous laws and regulations that govern the means by which companies in the healthcare industry may market their treatments to healthcare professionals and may compete by discounting the prices of their treatments, including for example, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal False Claims Act ("FCA"), the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"), and state law equivalents to these federal laws that are meant to protect against fraud and abuse and analogous laws in foreign countries. Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including, but not limited to, in some instances civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, and exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, federal and state laws are also sometimes open to interpretation. Accordingly, we could potentially face legal risks if our interpretation differs from those of enforcement authorities.



Further, from time to time we may find ourselves at a competitive disadvantage if our interpretation differs from that of our competitors.

 

Specifically, anti-kickback laws and regulations prohibit any knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration (direct or indirect, in case or in kind) in return for the referral, use, ordering, or recommending of the use of a product or service for which payment may be made by Medicare, Medicaid or other Government-sponsored healthcare programs. We have entered into consulting agreements, research agreements and product development agreements with physicians, including some who may order our products or make decisions to use them. In addition, some of these physicians own our stock, which they purchased in arm's length transactions on terms identical to those offered to non-physicians or received stock awards from us as consideration for services performed by them. While these transactions were structured with the intention of complying with all applicable laws, including state anti-referral laws and other applicable anti-kickback laws, it is possible that regulatory or enforcement agencies or courts may in the future view these transactions as prohibited arrangements that must be restructured or for which we would be subject to other significant civil or criminal penalties. There can be no assurance that regulatory or enforcement authorities will view these arrangements as being in compliance with applicable laws or that one or more of our employees or agents will not disregard the rules we have established. Because our strategy relies on the involvement of physicians who consult with us on the design of our potential products, perform clinical research on our behalf or educate the market about the efficacy and uses of our potential products, we could be materially impacted if regulatory or enforcement agencies or courts interpret our financial relationships with physicians who refer or order our potential products to be in violation of applicable laws and determine that we would be unable to achieve compliance with such applicable laws. This could harm our reputation and the reputations of the physicians we engage to provide services on our behalf. In addition, the cost of noncompliance with these laws could be substantial since we could be subject to monetary fines and civil or criminal penalties, and we could also be excluded from federally-funded healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, for non-compliance. Further, even the costs of defending investigations of noncompliance could be substantial.

-15-17-

The scope and enforcement of all of these laws is uncertain and subject to rapid change, especially in light of the lack of applicable precedent and regulations. There can be no assurance that federal or state regulatory or enforcement authorities will not investigate or challenge our current or future activities under these laws. Any investigation or challenge could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any state or federal regulatory or enforcement review of us, regardless of the outcome, would be costly and time consuming. Additionally, we cannot predict the impact of any changes in these laws, whether these changes are retroactive or will have effect on a going-forward basis only.

In order to grow revenues from certain of our products, we must expand our relationships with distributors and independent sales representatives, whom we do not control.

 

We derive significant revenues through our relationships with distributors and independent sales representatives. Sales through seven distributors, though no one distributor comprised over 5% of our revenueseach of which comprise more than 5% of our sales individually, totaled 78.4% of our sales from July 1, 2018 to the present. If such relationships were terminated for any reason, it could materially and adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and profits. Because the independent distributor often controls the customer relationships within its territory, there is a risk that if our relationship with the distributor ends, our relationship with the customer will be lost. Also, because we do not control a distributor's field sales agents, there is a risk we will be unable to ensure that our sales processes, compliance, and other priorities will be consistently communicated and executed by the distributor. If we fail to maintain relationships with our key distributors or fail to ensure that our distributors adhere to our sales processes, compliance, and other priorities, this could have an adverse effect on our operations.

 

We continue to invest significant capital in expanding our internal sales force, and there can be no assurance that these efforts will continue to result in significant increases in sales.

 



We are engaged in a major initiative to build and further expand our internal sales and marketing capabilities which has contributed to our increased sales.  As a result, we continue to invest in a direct sales force for certain of our products to allow us to reach new customers.  These expenses impact our operating results, and there can be no assurance that we will continue to be successful in significantly expanding the sales of our products.

 

To be commercially successful, we must convince physicians that our products are safe and effective alternatives to existing treatments and that our products should be used in their procedures.

 

We believe physicians will only adopt our products if they determine, based on experience, clinical data and published peer reviewed journal articles, that the use of our products in a particular procedure is a favorable alternative to conventional methods.  Physicians may be slow to change their medical treatment practices for the following reasons, among others: 

     

 

 

 

-

Their lack of experience with prior procedures in the field using our products;

 

-

Lack of evidence supporting additional patient benefits and our products over conventional methods;

 

-

Perceived liability risks generally associated with the use of new products and procedures;

 

-

Limited availability of reimbursement from third party payers; and

 

-

The time that must be dedicated to training.


-16-18-

In addition, we believe recommendations for and support of our products by influential physicians are essential for market acceptance and adoption.  If we do not receive this support or if we are unable to demonstrate favorable long-term clinical data, physicians and hospitals may not use our products, which would significantly reduce our ability to achieve expected revenue and would prevent us from sustaining profitability.

 

In the course of conducting our business, we must adequately address quality issues that may arise with our products, as well as defects in third-party components included in our products. Although we have established internal procedures to minimize risks that may arise from quality issues, we may not be able to eliminate or mitigate occurrences of these issues and associated liabilities. If the quality of our products does not meet the expectations of physicians or patients, then our brand and reputation could suffer and our business could be adversely impacted.

 

We will need to expand our organization and managing growth may be more difficult than expected.

 

Managing our growth may be more difficult than we expect.  We anticipate that a period of significant expansion will be required to penetrate and service the market for our existing and anticipated future products and to continue to develop new products.  This expansion will place a significant strain on management, operational and financial resources.  To manage the expected growth of our operations and personnel, we must both modify our existing operational and financial systems, procedures and controls and implement new systems, procedures and controls.  We must also expand our finance, administrative, and operations staff.  Management may be unable to hire, train, retain, motivate and manage necessary personnel or to identify, manage and exploit existing and potential strategic relationships and market opportunities.

 

We face the risk of product liability claims and may not be able to obtain or maintain adequate product liability insurance.

 

Our Although we have never been sued for product liability, our business exposes us to the risk of product liability claims that are inherent in the manufacturing, processing and marketing of medical devices genetic tests and human tissue products.  We may be subject to such claims if our products cause, or appear to have caused, an injury.  Claims may be made by patients, healthcare providers or others selling our products.  Defending a lawsuit, regardless of merit, could be costly, divert management attention and result in adverse publicity, which could result in the withdrawal of, or reduced acceptance of, our products in the market.

 



Although we have product liability insurance that we believe is adequate, this insurance is subject to deductibles and coverage limitations and we may not be able to maintain this insurance. Also, it is possible that claims could exceed the limits of our coverage. If we are unable to maintain product liability insurance at an acceptable cost or on acceptable terms with adequate coverage or otherwise protect ourselves against potential product liability claims or we underestimate the amount of insurance we need, we could be exposed to significant liabilities, which may harm our business.  A product liability claim or other claim with respect to uninsured liabilities or for amounts in excess of insured liabilities could result in significant costs and significant harm to our business.

 

Significant disruptions of information technology systems or breaches of information security could adversely affect our business.


-17-19-

We rely to a large extent upon sophisticated information technology systems to operate our business. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store and transmit large amounts of confidential information (including, but not limited to, personal information and intellectual property). We also have outsourced significant elements of our operations to third parties, including significant elements of our information technology infrastructure and, as a result, third party relationships with parties who may or could have access to our confidential information. The size and complexity of our information technology and information security systems, and those of our third parties with whom we contract (and the large amounts of confidential information that is present on them), make such systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions or to security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees or vendors, or from malicious attacks by third parties. Such attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication and are made by groups and individuals with a wide range of motives (including, but not limited to, industrial espionage and market manipulation) and expertise. While we have invested significantly in the protection of data and information technology, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent service interruptions or security breaches. Although we have cyber-insurance coverage that may cover certain events described above, this insurance is subject to deductibles and coverage limitations and we may not be able to maintain this insurance. Also, it is possible that claims could exceed the limits of our coverage.  Any interruption or breach in our systems could adversely affect our business operations and/or result in the loss of critical or sensitive confidential information or intellectual property, and could result in financial, legal, business and reputational harm to us or allow third parties to gain material, inside information that they use to trade in our securities. 

 

We may expand our business through acquisitions, licenses, investments, and other commercial arrangements in other companies or technologies, which contain significant risks.

 

We periodically evaluate strategic opportunities to acquire companies, divisions, technologies, products, and rights through licenses, distribution agreements, investments, and outright acquisitions to grow our business. In connection with one or more of those transactions, we may:


       

-

Issue additional equity securities that would dilute our stockholders' value;

-

Use cash that we may need in the future to operate our business;

-

Incur debt that could have terms unfavorable to us or that we might be unable to repay;

-

Structure the transaction in a manner that has unfavorable tax consequences, such as a stock purchase that does not permit a step-up in the tax basis for the assets acquired;

-

Be unable to realize the anticipated benefits, such as increased revenues, cost savings, or synergies from additional sales;

-

Be unable to secure the services of key employees related to the acquisition; and

-

Be unable to succeed in the marketplace with the acquisition.



-18-20-



Any of these items could materially, and adversely affect our revenues, financial condition, and profitability. Business acquisitions also involve the risk of unknown liabilities associated with the acquired business, which could be material. Incurring unknown liabilities or the failure to realize the anticipated benefits of an acquisition could materially, and adversely affect our business if we are unable to recover our initial investment, which could include the cost of acquiring licenses or distribution rights, acquiring products, purchasing initial inventory, or investments in early stage companies. Inability to recover our investment, or any write off of such investment, associated goodwill, or assets, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Our existing capital resources will not meet our current needs and we must raise additional funding in the immediate future to execute our business plan.

 

We believe we have sufficient funding to execute our business plan over the next twelve months and thereafter. However, we may elect to expand and accelerate our growth and business lines which could require additional funding outside of continued operations.  There can be no assurance that the necessary funds will be timely available if needed or that continuing operations will provide the needed cash flows.

 

Our financial resources are insufficient to repay amounts owed on outstanding liabilities.

 

Our cash reserves are not sufficient to pay current liabilities. We will be looking to pay these obligations through equity financings and/or revenues from operations. We do not have any financial commitments with respect to future financings, we have found it difficult to raise funding in recent periods and we have had negative cash flow from operating activities since organization. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will have the means to repay its obligations in full or at all.

 

We will rely on a single laboratory facility to process our molecular diagnostic tests and a second single laboratory facility to process and produce our regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps.

 

Initially, we will rely on a single CLIA-approved laboratory facility in Salt Lake City, Utah that we own to process our molecular diagnostic tests. We rely on a second laboratory facility in Salt Lake City, Utah that we own to process our regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps. These facilities and certain pieces of laboratory equipment would be difficult to replace and may require significant replacement lead-time. These facilities could be affected by natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods and fires. In the event either of these facilities or the equipment located in the facilities are affected by man-made or natural disasters, we would be unable to continue our genetic and/or molecular diagnostic business and meet customer demands for a significant period of time. Any interruption in our molecular diagnostic and/or regenerative medicine business would result in a loss of goodwill, including damage to its reputation. If our regenerative medicine and/or planned molecular diagnostic business were interrupted, it would seriously harm our business.

Our success is dependent on its key personnel.

 

Our success depends upon the skills, experience and efforts of senior management. We do have employment agreements with all members of senior management listed in management section. Should the services of any of these people become unavailable to us for any reason, our business would likely be adversely affected and may not continue at all. Competition for such personnel is intense in the genetics industry, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel. Our success will depend on its continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel.

 

We may never achieve the goals of our genetics business.

 

We have not generated material operating revenues from the sale of genetics products. There can be no assurance that we will develop any commercially viable genetic testing or treatment techniques. Our success will depend in part on our ability to deal with the problems, expenses, and delays frequently associated with establishing a new business venture. Future losses relating to our genetics business are planned prior to genetic operations potentially



becoming profitable. Given the uncertainties surrounding the commercialization of genetic discoveries, we are unable to predict when we will achieve profitability, if ever. Announcements by our present or potential competitors, technological innovations, new commercial products or services, regulatory developments, other developments, disputes concerning patent or proprietary rights, public concern regarding the safety, efficacy or other implications of the products or services that are expected to be developed by us or any future collaborators and other events or factors may have a significant impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As a result, there is no assurance that our operations will ever become profitable.

 


 


-19-21-

There can be no assurance of market acceptance for our genetic tests.

 

The commercial success of genetic predisposition and other genetic tests and treatments, which we may develop, will depend upon their acceptance as medically useful and cost-effective by physicians and other members of the medical community, patients and third-party payers. Broad market acceptance can be achieved only with substantial education about the benefits and limitations of such tests, as well as resolution of concerns about their appropriate and ethical use. For example, there continues to be widespread concern that people with genetic predispositions to diseases may suffer discrimination from employers, as well as providers of health and life insurance. There are also certain groups who oppose the use of genetic tests for inherited diseases for which no cures currently exist. We or our collaborative partners, if any, may be required to expend substantial financial resources to responsibly promote the benefits of any genetic tests and treatments it develops. There can be no assurance that any genetic tests and treatments we develop will gain market acceptance on a timely basis, if at all. Failure to achieve market acceptance will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our License Agreement is Subject to Certain Minimum Sales Requirements

 

We have an exclusive license to promote, market, offer for sale and sell the ARTguide™ test and other endometriosis tests in the United States. The territory can be expanded. To maintain the license, we must have minimum sales of $12.5 million in the twelve-month period beginning nine months after commercial launch. In the next year minimum sales must be $30 million and in the third year and thereafter minimum sales must be $60 million. Failure to meeting the minimum sales can result in the termination of our license agreement. There can be no assurance that we will meet the minimum sales requirements. The termination of the license agreement will bar our continued use and sale of the ARTguide™ test.

 

Our Ownership of Juneau is not Fully Paid

 

We currently own 51 48.5 percent of Juneau. We have fully paid for 23 26.4 percent of our ownership in Juneau and owe an additional $14.1 10,790,610 for the remainder of our interest. We are paying this amount in monthly installments for a period ending in December 2020. Failure to pay the monthly installments may result in our losses of the Juneau equity that has not been paid for. There can be no assurance that we will be able to pay for the entire outstanding balance.In that case, we would no longer be the majority and controlling equity owner of Juneau.

 

We may not be successful in developing genetic tests or in correctly interpreting the results of our genetic tests.

 

Whether the Company will be successful in offering genetic testing depends in large part upon the Company's ability to develop genetic tests for genes discovered by the Company. We are seeking to develop genetic tests that can identify the existence of a particular gene mutations that predispose a person to a particular disease. These gene mutations cannot be discovered until the relevant genes have been discovered and fully sequenced. Genes can be complex and may have numerous mutations. Moreover, a defective gene may malfunction in many different ways, and the many mutated versions of the gene may make a genetic test difficult to perform and interpret. Until a



mutation has been characterized, researchers cannot say for sure what risk it poses for an individual. Further, even when a genetic test identifies the existence of a mutation in a particular individual, the interpretation of the genetic test results is limited to the identification of a statistical probability that the tested individual will develop the disease for which the test has been completed. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in developing genetic tests based on our gene discoveries or other such tests will be able to be marketed at acceptable prices or will receive commercial acceptance in the market.

 

We may not be successful in obtaining adequate reimbursement for our genetic services and products.

 

Our ability to successfully commercialize any genetic test or treatments we develop, and the ability of any future collaborative partners, if any, to successfully commercialize such products, depends in part on obtaining adequate reimbursement for such services and products and related treatments from government and private health care insurers (including health maintenance organizations) and other third-party payers. Physicians' decisions to recommend genetic tests and treatments, as well as patients' elections to pursue testing and treatments, are likely to be heavily influenced by the scope and extent of coverage for such tests by third-party payers. Government and private third-party payers are increasingly attempting to contain health care costs by limiting both the extent of coverage and the reimbursement rate for new diagnostic and therapeutic products and services. In particular, services which are determined to be investigational in nature or which are not considered "reasonable and necessary" for diagnosis or treatment may be denied reimbursement coverage. If adequate reimbursement coverage is not available from third-party payers, there can be no assurance that individuals will elect to pay directly for the genetic testing and treatments and market acceptance of the genetic testing and treatments will likely be adversely impacted, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

 


-20-22-

In addition, Medicare often permits coverage decisions to be made by its carriers and intermediaries, leading to different coverage decisions in various parts of the United States. Disapproval of, or limitations in, coverage by the United States Health Care Financing Administration ("HCFA") or other third-party payers, as well as inadequate payment levels, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's future revenues. A key component in the reimbursement decision by HCFA and most private insurers is the development of Current Procedural Terminology ("CPT") codes, which are used in the submission of claims to insurers for reimbursement for medical services. CPT codes are developed, maintained and revised by a committee of medical specialists which is administered by the American Medical Association ("AMA"). Currently, reimbursement for genetic testing and treatments is made on the basis of CPT codes that may not accurately reflect the complexity or sophistication of specific genetic tests. There can be no assurance that specific CPT codes will be implemented for any genetic testing or treatments developed by the Company. Failure to secure recognition of such CPT codes would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or develop appropriate collaborative arrangements that will be necessary for us to develop and commercialize our genetics products and services.

 

Our current strategy is to rely, in part, on collaborative arrangements to develop and commercialize products based on gene discoveries. There can be no assurance that we will be able to negotiate acceptable collaborative arrangements, or that any collaborative arrangement will be successful. In addition, there can be no assurance that our collaborative partners will not pursue alternative technologies or develop alternative products either on their own or in collaboration with others, including with our competitors, as a means of developing diagnostic products or treatments for the diseases targeted by the collaborative programs. Milestone payments are frequently built into collaborative arrangements relating to gene discoveries. It is anticipated that our receipt of a substantial portion of

the potential milestone payments under future collaborative agreements, if any, is dependent upon the efforts of our strategic collaborators. Failure of any collaborative arrangement could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Additionally, there can be no assurance that disputes over rights or technology or other proprietary interests will not arise. Such disputes or disagreements between with future



collaborative partners could lead to delays in collaborative research projects, or could result in litigation or arbitration, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

We may not be successful in protecting our intellectual property.

 

Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain patent protection, both in the United States and in other countries. Patents may be issued for various aspects of our product, including genes, gene markers associated with disease, methods of diagnosing a women's predisposition to endometriosis, and methods for treating endometriosis which we believe are patentable. Also important to our success is its ability to preserve its trade secrets and to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. The patent position of biotechnology firms generally involves complex legal and factual questions. Isolated gene sequences have been considered patentable subject matter since the 1980s and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") has regularly issued patents covering isolated gene sequences. In addition, the USPTO has granted patents on gene markers associated with disease, as well as methods of diagnosing patients for a predisposition to disease. Some argue, however, that genes and diagnostics should not be eligible for patent protection for a number of public policy reasons. Recently, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that "naturally occurring" genes are not patentable subject matter. As a result, the legal landscape is not settled and several important cases are under review at both the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court. If one or more of these decisions rule against gene based diagnostic patents, it may significantly limit or eliminate our ability to obtain patent protection in the United States. Further, there can be no assurance that we will develop patentable applications or that patents will issue or that the claims of any issued patents will afford meaningful protection for any technology or products that we develop. In addition, there can be no assurance that any patents issued to us or our licensors will not be challenged, and subsequently narrowed, invalidated or circumvented.

 

We depend on a limited number of third parties for some of our supplies of equipment and reagents. If these supplies become unavailable, then we may not be able to successfully conduct research or operate our genetics business at all or on a timely basis.

 


-21-23-

We (and are partners) currently rely on a small number of suppliers to provide its gene sequencing machines, robots, and specialty reagents required in connection with its research. Management believes that currently there are limited alternative suppliers of gene sequencing machines, robots, and reagents. The gene sequencing machines, robots, or the reagents may not remain available in commercial quantities at acceptable costs. If we are unable to obtain when needed additional gene sequencing machines, robots, or an adequate supply of reagents or other ingredients at commercially reasonable rates, our ability to continue to identify genes and perform molecular diagnostic testing would be adversely affected.

 

Risks Related to FDA Approval

 

As noted, our initial commercial genetics product will be an LDT, conducted in a CLIA-certified laboratory, for indications of endometriosis, which will be marketed to Assisted Reproductive Therapy centers and, subsequently, to the broader OB/GYN physician marketplace. We believe that this product does not require FDA approval. We currently contemplate the eventual launch of a test "kit", to be marketed as a companion diagnostic for on-label therapeutic indication. We believe that such a kit would be subject to the FDA approval protocol, including clinical trials.  The FDA Approval process can be an extended, complex, and expensive process.  No assurances can be given that, in the event the Company does elect to pursue a kit, FDA approval will be granted.

 

Risks Relating to our regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 



Our regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps are dependent on the availability of tissue from human donors, and any disruption in supply could adversely affect our business.

 

The success of our regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps depends upon, among other factors, the availability of tissue from human donors. Any failure to obtain tissue from our sources will interfere with our ability to effectively meet demand for our products incorporating human tissue. The processing of human tissue into our products is very labor-intensive and it is therefore difficult to maintain a steady supply stream. The availability of donated tissue could also be adversely impacted by regulatory changes, public opinion of the donor process as well as our own reputation in the industry. The challenges we may face in obtaining adequate supplies of human tissue involve several risks, including limited control over availability, quality and delivery schedules. In addition, any interruption in the supply of any human tissue component could materially harm our ability to manufacture our products until a new source of supply, if any, could be found. We may be unable to find a sufficient alternative supply channel in a reasonable time period or on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

The regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps we manufacture and process are derived from human tissue and, therefore, have the potential for disease transmission.

 

The utilization of human tissue creates the potential for transmission of communicable disease, including, but not limited to, human immunodeficiency virus ("HIV"), viral hepatitis, syphilis and other viral, fungal or bacterial pathogens.  We are required to comply with federal and state regulations intended to prevent communicable disease transmission. Although we maintain strict quality controls over the procurement and processing of our tissue, there is no assurance that these quality controls will be adequate.  In addition, negative publicity concerning disease transmission from other companies' improperly processed donated tissue could have a negative impact on the demand for our products.

 

Disruption of our processing could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our results of operations are dependent upon the continued operation of our processing facilities.  Risks that could impact our ability to use these facilities include the occurrence of natural and other disasters, and the need to comply with the requirements of directives from Government agencies, including the FDA.  We do not have a secondary processing facility. The unavailability of our manufacturing and processing facilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations during the period of such unavailability.

 

We may implement a product recall or voluntary market withdrawal, which could significantly increase our costs, damage our reputation and disrupt our business.

 

The manufacturing, marketing and processing of our regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps involves an inherent risk that our tissue products or processes do not meet applicable quality standards and requirements.  In that event, we may voluntarily implement a recall or market withdrawal or may be required to do so by a regulatory authority.  A recall or market withdrawal of one of our products would be costly and would divert management resources.  A recall or withdrawal of one of our products, or a similar product processed by another entity, also could impair sales of our products as a result of confusion concerning the scope of the recall or withdrawal, or as a result of the damage to our reputation for quality and safety.


-22-24-

Any changes in the governmental regulatory classifications of our product candidates could prevent, limit or delay our ability to market or develop our product candidates.

The FDA establishes regulatory requirements based on the classification of a product. An HCT/P is a product containing or consisting of human cells or tissue intended for transplantation into a human patient. 361 HCT/Ps are not subject to any premarket clearance or approval requirements and are subject to less extensive post-market regulatory requirements. Because our product development programs are designed to satisfy the standards applicable



to 361 HCT/Ps, any change in the regulatory classification or designation of our products would affect our ability to obtain FDA approval or clearance for and marketing of our product candidates.

 

If a product candidate is deemed not to be a 361 HCT/P, FDA regulations will require premarket clearance or approval requirements that will involve significant time and cost investments by us. Further, there can be no assurance that the FDA will not, at some future point, change its position on current or future products' 361 HCT/P status, and any regulatory reclassification could have adverse consequences for us and make it substantially more difficult or expensive for us to conduct our business by requiring extensive clinical trials, premarket clearance or approval and compliance with additional post-market regulatory requirements with respect to those product candidates. Moreover, increased regulatory scrutiny within the industry in which we operate could lead to increased regulation of HCT/Ps, including 361 HCT/Ps. We also cannot assure you that the FDA will not impose more stringent interpretations, restrictions, or requirements with respect to products that qualify as 361 HCT/Ps.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

The price of our common stock has been, and will likely continue to be, volatile.

 

The market price of our common stock, like that of the securities of many other companies that are in, or are just emerging from, the development stage, has fluctuated over a wide range and it is likely that the price of our common stock will fluctuate in the future.  The market price of our common stock could be impacted by a variety of factors, including:

       

 

 

-

Fluctuations in stock market prices and trading volumes of similar companies or of the markets generally;

 

   

-

Our ability to successfully launch, market and earn significant revenue from our products;

 

   

-

Our ability to obtain additional financing to support our continuing operations;

 

   

-

Disclosure of the details and results of regulatory applications and proceedings;

 

   

-

Changes in Government regulations or our failure to comply with any such regulations;

 

   

-

Additions or departures of key personnel;

 

   

-

Our investments in research and development or other corporate resources;

 

   

-

Announcements of technological innovations or new commercial products by us or our competitors;

 


-23-25-





   

-

Developments in the patents or other proprietary rights owned or licensed by us or our competitors;

 

-

The timing of new product introductions;

 

     

-

Actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results, including any restatements of previously reported results;

 

-

 

Our ability to effectively and consistently manufacture our products and avoid costs associated with the recall of defective or potentially defective products;

 

   

-

Our ability and the ability of our distribution partners to market and sell our products;

 

   

-

Changes in reimbursement for our products or the price for our products to our customers;

 

   

-

Removal of our products from the Federal Supply Schedule, or changes in how Government accounts purchase products such as ours or in the price for our products to Government accounts;

 

   

-

Material amounts of short-selling of our common stock; and

 

   

The other risks detailed in this Registration Statement.

Further, due to the relatively fixed nature of most of our costs, which primarily include personnel costs as well as facilities costs, any unanticipated shortfall in revenue in any fiscal quarter would have an adverse effect on our results of operations in that quarter.  These fluctuations could cause the trading price of our stock to be negatively affected. Our quarterly operating results have varied substantially in the past and may vary substantially in the future.  In addition, the stock market and certain of the indices on which we are included has been very volatile in the recent past.  This volatility is often not related to the operating performance of companies listed thereon and will probably continue in the foreseeable future.

 

We recently identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, and our business and stock price may be adversely affected if our internal control over financial reporting is not effective

  

Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules promulgated by the SEC, companies are required to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of their internal control over financial reporting. As part of this process, we are required to document and test our internal control over financial reporting; management is required to assess and issue a report concerning our internal control over financial reporting; and our independent registered public accounting firm is required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be prevented or detected timely. Even effective internal controls over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements.

 


-26-

During the financial close for the quarter ended March 31, 2019, we identified a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting related to insufficient controls over the income tax accounting for business combinations and asset acquisitions. A more complete description of this material weakness is included in Item 4, "Controls and Procedures" in the financial statements as of and for the nine months ended March 31, 2019 included in Item 13 of this Form 10.

Securities analysts may elect not to report on our common stock or may issue negative reports that adversely affect the stock price.



-24-




At this time, no analysts provide research coverage of our common stockon the company.  There is no assurance that any analysts will ever report on our common stock or that any analysts will initiate reporting on our common stock.  Rules mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and a global settlement reached in 2003 among the SEC, other regulatory agencies, and a number of investment banks led to a number of fundamental changes in how analysts are reviewed and compensated.  In particular, many investment banking firms are required to contract with independent financial analysts for their stock research.  If securities analysts discontinue covering our common stock, the lack of research coverage may adversely affect its actual and potential market price.  The trading market for our common stock may be affected in part by the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about our business.  If one or more analysts elect to cover us and then downgrade the stock, the stock price would likely decline rapidly.  If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.  This could have a negative effect on the market price of our shares.

Our charges to earnings resulting from acquisition, restructuring and integration costs may materially adversely affect the market value of our common stock.

 

We account for the completion of our acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting. We allocate the total estimated purchase prices to net tangible assets, amortizable intangible assets and indefinite-lived intangible assets, and based on their fair values as of the date of completion of the acquisitions, record the excess of the purchase price over those fair values as goodwill. Our financial results, including earnings per share, could be adversely affected by a number of financial adjustments required in purchase accounting including the following:

   

-

We will incur additional amortization expense over the estimated useful lives of certain of the intangible assets acquired in connection with acquisitions during such estimated useful lives.

 

 

-

We will incur additional depreciation expense as a result of recording purchased tangible assets.


   

 

 

-

To the extent the value of goodwill or intangible assets becomes impaired, we may be required to incur material charges relating to the impairment of those assets.


   

 

 

-

Cost of sales may increase temporarily following an acquisition as a result of acquired inventory being recorded at its fair market value.

 

 

-

Earnings may be affected by changes in estimates of future contingent consideration to be paid when an earn-out is part of the consideration.


   

 

 

-

Earnings may be affected by transaction and implementation costs, which are expensed immediately.

 

We do not intend to pay cash dividends.

 

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently expect to use available funds and any future earnings in the development, operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.  In addition, the terms of our existing credit facility restrict us from paying dividends.  As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be an investor's only source of potential gain from our common stock for the foreseeable future.

Substantial future sales of our common stock by us or by our existing stockholders could cause our stock price to fall.

Additional equity financings or other share issuances by us, including shares issued in connection with strategic alliances and corporate partnering transactions, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Sales by existing stockholders of a large number of shares of our common stock in the public market or the perception that additional sales could occur could cause the market price of our common stock to drop.

We have experienced volatility in the price of our stock and are subject to volatility in the future.

The price of our common stock has experienced significant volatility. The high and low bid quotations for our common stock, as reported by the OTC Markets, ranged between a high of $3.87 4.36 and a low of $.60 0.82 during



the past 12 months. The historic market price of our common stock may be higher or lower than the price paid for our shares and may not be indicative of future market prices, depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. As a result, investors may be unwilling to purchase our common stock and our market price may be affected. The price of our stock may change dramatically in response to our success or failure and based upon our relationship and the decisions of our Chief Executive Officer.

We may not be able to obtain or maintain a listing on NASDAQ.

In the event that we become listed on the NASDAQ there is no assurance that we will be able to maintain that listing.

Our common stock currently trades on the Over-The-Counter markets under the symbol PRED. We will plan to seek a listing on NASDAQ. We currently do not qualify for a listing on NASDAQ and there can be no assurance that we will qualify for a NASDAQ listing in the future. In addition, if a NASDAQ listing is obtained then we will be subject to continued listing requirements to maintain the listing and to avoid delisting. Our results of operations and our current and fluctuating stock price directly impact our ability to satisfy these listing standards.

The Over-The-Counter market is generally considered to be a less efficient system than listing on markets such as NASDAQ or other national exchanges because of lower trading volumes, transaction delays and reduced security analyst and news media coverage. These factors could contribute to lower prices and larger spreads in the bid and ask prices for our common stock. Additionally, trading of our common stock on the OTCBB may make us less desirable to institutional investors and may, therefore, limit our future equity funding options and could negatively affect the liquidity of our stock.

-25-27-


ITEM 2.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION .

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS   

 

Forward Looking Statements

From time to time, we or our representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements, orally or in writing. Such forward-looking statements may be included in, but not limited to, press releases, oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Words or phrases "will likely result", "are expected to", "will continue", "is anticipated", "estimate", "project or projected", or similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements". Such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the above discussion of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements.

 

Management is currently unaware of any trends or conditions other than those mentioned in this management's discussion and analysis that could have a material adverse effect on the company's current financial position, future results of operations, or liquidity, because its current operations are limited. However, investors should also be aware of factors that could have a negative impact on the company's prospects and the consistency of progress in the areas of revenue generation, liquidity, and generation of capital resources, once it begins to implement its business plan. These may include: (i) variations in revenue, (ii) possible inability to attract investors for its equity securities or otherwise raise adequate funds from any source should the company seek to do so, (iii) increased governmental regulation or significant changes in that regulation, (iv) increased competition, (v) unfavorable outcomes to litigation involving the Company or to which the Company may become a party in the future, and (vi) a very competitive and rapidly changing operating environment.

 

The risks identified here are not all inclusive. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on the company's business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual results.



 

The financial information set forth in the following discussion should be read with our financial statements included elsewhere herein.

 

Overview  

 

We develop and commercialize discoveries and technologies involved in novel molecular diagnostic, regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps. We use this information as the cornerstone in the development of new diagnostics that assess a person's risk of disease and pharmaceutical therapeutics and HCT/Ps designed to effectively prevent and treat the disease.

In accordance with ASC 280-10-50, Segment Reporting, operating Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance.  We operate The Company operates in two reportable segments: HCT/Ps and diagnostics and therapeutics. Our Predictive Biotech's HCT/Ps are processed in our FDA registered lab. Our minimally manipulated tissue products are prepared utilizing proprietary extraction methods that reduce the loss of important scaffolding, growth factor and general cytokines and are intended for homologous use.  Our Predictive Technology's diagnostics and therapeutics uses data analytics for disease identification and subsequent therapeutic intervention through unique novel gene-based diagnostics, biotechnology treatments and companion therapeutics.

-28-


Segment revenue and operating income (loss) was as follows during the periods presented:


-26-




                     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Years ended June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

Segment revenues

 

 

 

 

 

HCT/Ps

 

 

 $     16,624,336

 

 $   2,585,362

 

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                          -

 

                          -

 

 

 

Total consolidated revenues

 $     16,624,336

 

 $    2,585,362

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment operating income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

HCT/Ps

 

 

 $     (5,821,549)

 

 $     (3,220,478)

 

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

         (6,503,628)

 

         (1,568,070)

 

 

 

Total consolidated operating income (loss)

 $   (12,325,177)

 

 $     (4,788,548)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciliation of segment operating income

 

 

 

 

 

to income before income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

Segment operating income

 $   (12,325,177)

 

 $     (4,788,548)

 

 

Equity method gain/(loss)

            (899,950)

 

            (128,594)

 

 

Impairment charges

                          -   

 

         (1,603,394)

 

 

Interest income / (expense)

               199,953

 

               315,742

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

 $   (13,025,174)

 

 $     (6,204,794)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


                   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 months ended

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 September 31,

 

 June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

2018

Segment revenues

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $                         8,063,800

 

 $              16,624,336

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

 -

 

  -

 

 

Total consolidated revenues

 $                        8,063,800

 

 $              16,624,336

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment operating income (loss)

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $                             673,003

 

 $              (5,821,549)

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                          (2,739,916)

 

                 (6,503,628)

 

 

Total consolidated operating income (loss)

 $                       (2,066,913)

 

 $            (12,325,177)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciliation of segment operating income

 

 

 

 

to income before income taxes

 

 

 

 

Segment operating income

 $                       (2,066,913)

 

 $            (12,325,177)

 

Equity method gain/(loss)

                              (314,782)

 

                     (899,950)

 

Impairment charges

 -

 

 -

 

Interest income / (expense)

                                         424

 

                       199,953

 

 

Segment income before income taxes

 $                       (2,381,271)

 

 $            (13,025,174)






 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


                     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Years ended June 30,

 

Capital assets, net

2018

 

2017

 

 

HCT/Ps

 

 

 $     438,277

 

 $      73,143

 

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

               335,592

 

               445,791

 

 

 

Total capital assets, net

 $     773,870

 

 $    518,934

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation expense

 

 

 

 

 

HCT/Ps

 

 

 $       82,306

 

 $        2,895

 

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                 68,339

 

                   1,677

 

 

 

Total depreciation expense

 $     150,645

 

 $        4,572

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible and equity method investment assets, net

 

 

 

 

 

HCT/Ps

 

 

 $   8,096,311

 

 $ 10,914,097

 

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

         74,288,652

 

         26,968,113

 

 

 

Total intangible and equity method investment assets, net

 $ 82,384,963

 

 $ 37,882,210

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization expense

 

 

 

 

 

HCT/Ps

 

 

 $   2,817,786

 

 $  2,817,786

 

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

           1,605,103

 

               871,221

 

 

 

Total amortization expense

 $   4,422,889

 

 $  3,689,007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrants and options expense (non-cash)

 

 

 

 

 

HCT/Ps

 

 

 $    8,216,888

 

 $   1,116,586

 

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

           2,310,539

 

               105,338

 

 

 

Total warrants and options expense (non-cash)

 $  10,527,427

 

 $   1,221,924

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     


                   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 months ended

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 September 31,

 

 June 30,

Capital assets, net

2018

 

2018

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $        892,584

 

 $    438,277

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                             1,025,650

 

                       335,592

 

 

Total capital assets, net

 $      1,918,234

 

 $    773,869

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation expense

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $         37,021

 

 $     82,306

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                                   45,120

 

                          68,339

 

 

Total depreciation expense

 $         82,141

 

 $   150,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible and equity method investment assets, net

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $     7,643,543

 

 $ 8,096,311






 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                        101,078,430

 

                 74,288,652

 

 

Total intangible and equity method investment assets, net

 $  108,721,973

 

 $82,384,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization expense

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $        704,445

 

 $  2,817,786

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                                884,851

 

                    1,605,103

 

 

Total amortization expense

 $     1,589,296

 

 $  4,422,889

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrants and options expense (non-cash)

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $          55,749

 

 $   8,216,888

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                                599,199

 

                    2,310,539

 

 

Total warrants and options expense (non-cash)

 $        654,948

 

 $ 10,527,427

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


               

 

 

HCT/Ps

Diagnostics & Therapeutics

Total

Three months ended March 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

11,285,218

$

10,400

$

11,295,618

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

782,171

 

1,591,835

 

2,374,006

Segment operating income (loss)

 

 

694,787

 

(5,728,733)

 

(5,033,946)

Three months ended March 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

4,232,650

$

-   

$

4,232,650

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

883,751

 

264,511

 

1,148,262

Segment operating loss

 

 

(927,498)

 

(3,830,978)

 

(4,758,376)

Nine months ended March 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

30,036,056

$

10,400

$

30,046,456

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

2,295,055

 

3,780,035

 

6,075,090

Segment operating income (loss)

 

 

3,427,191

 

(13,268,072)

 

(9,840,881)

Nine months ended March 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

9,472,404

$

-

$

9,472,404

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

2,606,218

 

780,408

 

3,386,626

Segment operating loss

 

 

(1,849,920)

 

(10,775,659)

 

(12,625,579)



-27-




-28-





-29-


                   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 months ended

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 September 31,

 

 June 30,

Capital assets, net

2018

 

2018

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $        892,584

 

 $    438,277

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                             1,025,650

 

                       335,592

 

 

Total capital assets, net

 $      1,918,234

 

 $    773,869

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation expense

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $         37,021

 

 $     82,306

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                                   45,120

 

                          68,339

 

 

Total depreciation expense

 $         82,141

 

 $   150,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible and equity method investment assets, net

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $     7,643,543

 

 $ 8,096,311

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                        101,078,430

 

                 74,288,652

 

 

Total intangible and equity method investment assets, net

 $  108,721,973

 

 $82,384,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization expense

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $        704,445

 

 $  2,817,786

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                                884,851

 

                    1,605,103

 

 

Total amortization expense

 $     1,589,296

 

 $  4,422,889

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrants and options expense (non-cash)

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $          55,749

 

 $   8,216,888

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                                599,199

 

                    2,310,539

 

 

Total warrants and options expense (non-cash)

 $        654,948

 

 $ 10,527,427

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


-29-


                   

 

 

Three months ended

Nine months ended

 

 

March  31,

March 31,

 

 

2019

2018

2019

2018

Total operating loss for reportable segments

 

$

(5,033,946)

$

(4,758,376)

$

(9,840,881)

$

(12,625,579)

Unallocated amounts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from equity method investment

 

 

(193,524)

 

(22,647)

 

(1,108,423)

 

(22,647)

Interest income

 

 

1,508

 

-

 

2,420

 

199,732





Other income (expense)

 

 

1,247

 

(2,802)

 

           1,248   

 

1,000

Bargain purchase gain

 

 

272,757

 

-

 

272,757

 

-

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(4,951,958)

 

(4,783,825)

 

(10,672,879)

 

(12,447,494)

Income tax benefit

 

 

(1,215,312)

 

(1,579,463)

 

(2,541,290)

 

(4,905,699)

Net loss

 

 

(3,736,646)

 

(3,204,362)

 

(8,131,589)

 

(7,541,795)

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

(27,735)

 

(10,946)

 

(88,858)

 

(32,837)

Net loss attributable to Predictive Technology Group, Inc. stockholders

 

$

(3,708,911)

$

(3,193,416)

$

(8,042,731)

$

(7,508,958)

 

         

 

 

As of March 31,

 

 As of June 30,

Total Assets

 

2019

 

2018

 

$

  16,655,285

$

11,206,096

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

599,199

 120,723,817

                    2,310,539

92,781,097

 

 Total Assets

Total warrants and options expense (non-cash)

 $654,948

 137,379,102

 $10,527,427

103,987,193

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


-30-

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial position are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We review the accounting policies used in reporting our financial results on a regular basis. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis and may employ outside experts to assist in our evaluations. We believe that the estimates we use are reasonable; however, actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe the following critical accounting policies identify our most critical accounting policies, which are the policies that are both important to the representation of our financial condition and results and require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Going Concern

The These financial statements were prepared on a going concern basis.  The going concern basis assumes that we the Company will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.

Predictive Biotech, Inc., a wholly owned  ("Predictive Biotech"), a subsidiary of PTG, began operations during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.   Since the inception of operations, revenues have exceeded cash expenses and such excess contributes to the overall operations of PTG.

In addition, we have PTG has raised sufficient capital through stock subscriptions to fund our its obligations under our its licenses and other agreements for the development of molecular diagnostics products under an exclusive license. It is anticipated that the initial sale of such products will take place in the 2019 fiscal year.license in Predictive Therapeutics, LLC ("Predictive Therapeutics"), a subsidiary of PTG.

Accounts Receivable



Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount.  At the present time most sales are through credit cards, however from time to time, credit is granted to customers on a short-term basis without requiring collateral, and as such, these accounts receivable, do not bear interest, although a finance charge may be applied to such receivables that are past due.  The Company has in place credit policies and procedures and approval process for sales returns and credit memos.

Inventories

Inventories consist primarily of HCT/Ps we produce. We value inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We determine the cost of inventory using the standard-cost method, which approximates actual cost based on a first-in, first-out method. All other costs, including administrative costs are expensed as incurred.   

We analyze our inventory levels annually and write down inventory that has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value, or that is considered in excess of normal operating levels, as determined by management.  The related costs are recognized as cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Stock Subscriptions Receivable

Stock subscriptions are recorded as contra-equity on the day the subscription agreement is signed and accepted. All stock subscribed as of the date of the financial statements has been collected. The stock is not issued until subscriptions are collected.

Prepaid Expenses

Amounts paid in advance for expenses are accounted for as prepaid expenses and classified as current assets if such amounts are to be recognized as expense with the current period.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Lab equipment, furniture and computer equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method based on the lesser of estimated useful lives of the related assets or lease terms. Lab equipment items have depreciable lives of five years, furniture items have depreciable lives of 5 to 7 years, and computer equipment items have depreciable lives of 3 years. Repairs and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred.

Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets

Intangible and other long-lived assets are comprised of acquired patents, licenses, trade secrets and other intellectual property.  Acquired intangible assets are recorded at fair value and amortized over the shorter of the contractual life or the estimated useful life.  

-31-

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, such as property, equipment, and definite-lived intangibles subject to depreciation and amortization, as well as acquisition costs of subsidiaries, are reviewed for impairment annually , as of April 1, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Such events and circumstances may include sweeping regulatory changes, shifts in market demand that would negatively impact revenue, restrictions to capital markets, overall industry deterioration, dramatic increase in the number of competitors, rapidly increasing costs related to production inputs, significant changes in Company management or Company strategy, and/or significant litigation. The Company first will assess qualitative factors above to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step impairment test to identify any impairment loss.

Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to estimated future undiscounted net cash flows , or fair value, of the related asset or group of assets over their remaining lives. The Company used a qualified, independent, and certified third-party valuation expert to determine the estimates of future cash flows that determine fair value. The Company then compared fair value to carrying value. Other than what is recorded in the year ending June 30, 2017 financial statements seen above, there are no additional asset groups in which the fair value is less than or close to carrying value.  

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the converged standard on revenue recognition with the objective of providing a single, comprehensive model for all contracts with customers to



improve comparability in the financial statements of companies reporting using International Financial Reporting Standards and U.S. GAAP. The standard contains principles that an entity must apply to determine the measurement of revenue and timing of when it is recognized. The underlying principle is that an entity must recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. An entity can apply the revenue standard retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method) or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application in retained earnings (modified retrospective method).

The standard was effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. The Company elected to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective approach. This approach was adopted because the Company believes the new Standard has very little impact on revenue recognition for the current products sold.

The Company generates revenue by selling Human Cell and Tissue Products (HC/TP'sHCT/Ps) to clinics and doctors. Revenue from these sales are recorded at the invoiced amount net of any discounts or contractual allowances. The Company has determined that the shipment of the product indicates transfer of control for revenue recognition purposes.

We have evaluated each of the five steps in Topic 606, which are as follows:

1) Identify the contract with the customer;

2) Identify the performance obligations in the contract;

3) Determine the transaction price;

4) Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and

5) Recognize revenue when (or as) performance obligations are satisfied.

Our conclusion is that we have identified similar performance obligations under ASC Topic 606 as compared with deliverables and separate units of account previously identified under the old standard. As a result, the timing of our revenue appears to remain the same in comparison to the prior revenue recognition guidance.

We sell our products through a direct sales force and through distribution in the U.S.  Revenues from these customers are recognized when all the five steps identified above have occurred.  These criteria are generally satisfied at the time of shipment when risk of loss and title passes to the customer.  We reserve for sales returns, including returns related to defective products, as a reduction in net sales, based on our historical experience.  These reserves are recorded as a reduction in net sales and are not considered material to our consolidated statements of income for 3 9 months ended September 30March 31, 2018  2019 and for the year ended June 30, 2018. 

The Company also has significant experience with historical discount patterns and uses this experience to finalize transaction prices. In accordance with ASU 2016-12, the Company would elect to exclude from the measurement of transaction price, all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by the Company from a customer for e.g. sales tax, value added tax etc.  However, as our business is thus far not with the end consumer, the collection of taxes is unnecessary.


-32-

The Company has also elected to apply the practical expedient for not adjusting revenue recognized for the effects of the time value of money. This practical expedient has been elected because the Company collects cash directly from customers immediately adjacent to shipment.

There are also certain considerations related to internal control over financial reporting that are associated with implementing Topic 606. We are currently evaluating our control framework for revenue recognition and identifying any changes that may need to be made in response to the new guidance. Disclosure requirements under the new guidance in Topic 606 have been significantly expanded in comparison to the disclosure requirements under the current guidance.

Shipping and Handling

We bill our customers for shipping and handling charges, which are included in net sales for the applicable period, and the corresponding shipping and handling expense is reported in cost of sales.



-32-




Research and Product Development Costs

We expense research and product development costs as incurred.

Product Liability and Warranty Costs

We maintain product liability insurance and has not experienced any related claims from its products offerings. We also offer a warranty to customers providing that its products will be delivered free of any materials defects.  There have been no material costs incurred since inception based on estimated return rates.  We review the adequacy of its recorded accrual on a quarterly basis.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded to reflect the future tax consequences attributable to the effects of differences between the carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities for financial reporting and for income tax purposes. Deferred taxes are calculated by applying enacted statutory tax rates and tax laws to future years in which temporary differences are expected to reverse. The impact on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that the rate change is enacted.  

Measurement of Fair Value

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values.  Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined in the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

 


-33-


Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting periods.  Key estimates in the accompanying consolidated financial statements include, among others, revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts and product returns, provisions for obsolete inventory, valuation of long-lived assets, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances.  Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) ("ASU 2016-02"), which modified lease accounting for both lessees and lessors to increase transparency and comparability by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous accounting standards and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the timing of its adoption and the impact of adopting the new lease standard on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases, by issuing Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, which requires lessees to recognize leases on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842; ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases; and ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements. The new standard establishes a right-of-use model (ROU) that requires a lessee to



recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the income statement.

The new standard is effective for us on July 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We expect to adopt the new standard on its effective date. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) its effective date or (2) the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the new standard for the comparative periods. We expect to adopt the new standard on July 1, 2019 and use the effective date as our date of initial application. Consequently, financial information will not be updated, and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods before July 1, 2019.

The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We expect to elect the 'package of practical expedients', which permits us not to reassess under the new standard our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. We expect to elect all of the new standard's available transition practical expedients that are applicable.

The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity's ongoing accounting. We currently expect to elect the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means, for those leases that qualify, we will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, and this includes not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. We also currently expect to elect the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of our leases.

We expect that this standard will not have a material impact on our financial statements, as we have a limited volume of operating leases that do not qualify for the short term lease exemption. We currently do not expect a significant change in our leasing activities between now and the adoption of the standard.



-34-

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business , which provides guidance to entities to assist with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business and provides a screen to determine when a set is not a business. Under the new guidance, when substantially all of the fair value of gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset, or group of similar assets, the assets acquired would not represent a business. Also, to be considered a business, an acquisition would have to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to produce outputs. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and should be applied on a prospective basis to any transactions occurring within the period of adoption. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual periods in which the financial statements have not been issued. We do not presently anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2017-01 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory , which requires the recognition of the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 will be effective for us beginning on July 1, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-16 on our consolidated financial statements.

-33-




In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments , which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 will be effective for us beginning on July 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted. We do not presently anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which amends the guidance regarding the classification and measurement of financial instruments. Changes to the current guidance primarily affect the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, ASU 2016-01 clarifies guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. ASU 2016-01 will be effective for us beginning on July 1, 2018. Early adoption is not permitted except for the provision to record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-01, an entity should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. We do not presently anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2016-01 will have a material impact on our financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes , which will require all deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities to be presented as noncurrent within a classified balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 was effective for us as of July 1, 2017. ASU 2015-17 may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax assets and liabilities or retrospectively to all periods presented. We have elected not to early adopt ASU 2015-17. We do not anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2015-17 will have a material impact on our financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) , to update the financial reporting requirements for revenue recognition. Topic 606 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The guidance is based on the principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also

requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to fulfill a contract. This guidance is effective for us beginning on July 1, 2018, and entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach for the adoption of the new standard. We have evaluated the adoption of this standard on a retrospective basis and believe it will have no material impact to what has been reported.  Therefore, the Company will adopt this standard on a modified retrospective basis.

 


-35-

Business Combinations

Predictive Therapeutics, LLC

On April 15, 2015, the Company, then known as Global Enterprises Group, Inc. ("GLHO"), acquired 100% of Predictive Therapeutics, LLC.  After the acquisition, GLHO changed its name to Predictive Technology Group, Inc. On October 31, 2015, the initial agreement was modified to make certain technical corrections and adjustments for contingencies which were not met at that date.  The Company issued a total of 131,058,458 shares of common stock in this transaction.  Under this merger agreement, there was a change in control which has been treated for accounting purposes as a reverse recapitalization.

LifeCode Genetics, Inc.,



On November 6, 2015, the Company announced the acquisition of LifeCode Genetics, Inc. ("LifeCode") as its wholly owned subsidiary. LifeCode holds held a strategic equity investment of 10.169% in 2,792,292 units of Juneau Biosciences, LLC ("Juneau").   In addition to the development of an assay and related services for the prognosis and monitoring of endometriosis in the infertility market which the Company has licensed, Juneau is developing technologies for the diagnosis of other women's health issues.

The Company issued 6,561,870 common shares to acquire LifeCode and has recorded the with an acquisition as a Portfolio Investment with a valuation set at date fair value of $16,404,675 based on our stock price.

A share exchange agreement was entered into on September 22, 2015 that required the Company to issue to an additional 5,718,372 shares to former LifeCode former shareholders to meet the terms of the exchange agreement an additional 5,718,372 shares.  Using the OTC value (defined as the share price listed on the date of the transaction in the over-the-counter dealer markets and networks) for the additional shares issued results in an increase of value the purchase price to $30,700,605, an increase of $14,295,930.  A valuation performed by an external outside valuation expert specialist supports a September 22, 2015 value of the interest in Juneau of $16,520,150 resulting , which resulted in a day one impairment of $14,180,455. Net of the impact of the impairment, the Company recognized a deferred tax liability of $9,827,777 related to differences between book and tax basis arising from the acquisition of Lifecode.

The fair value of the purchase consideration issued to the sellers of LifeCode was allocated to the units of equity acquired, which are included in equity method investments on the consolidated balance sheets.

Juneau reports to its members on a calendar year basis and LifeCode records its distributable share of such reported income using the equity method.

SEC Rule 4-08(g) of Regulation S-X requires a registrant to disclose, in the notes to its financial statements, The summarized balance sheet and income statement information of all investees on an aggregate basis, if deemed significant.  See such summaries below.  The numbers presented in the schedules below related to Juneau are audited. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, and are unaudited for the year ended June 30, 2018.


-34-






           

Juneau Biosciences, LLC

BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

Assets

 

 

 

 

Current Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

 $          40,077

 

 $         69,718

 

Accounts receivable

 

                     -

 

                    -

 

Inventory

 

                     -

 

                    -

Total Current Assets

 

             40,077

 

            69,718

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Machinery & equipment

 

           742,642

 

          742,642

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

          (742,642)

 

         (742,642)

Total Fixed Assets

 

                     -

 

                    -

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Patents

 

           168,476

 

          163,426

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

            (64,385)

 

           (54,673)

 

Security Deposits

 

             39,022

 

            34,922

Total Other Assets

 

           143,113

 

          143,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

 $        183,190

 

 $       213,393

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts Payable

 

 $          13,321

 

 $    1,049,529

 

Credit Card Payable

 

                     -

 

            18,308

 

Salary Payable

 

           898,669

 

          843,727

 

Accrued Payroll Liabilities

 

                  416

 

            32,853

 

Accrued Interest

 

           266,320

 

          860,042

 

Notes Payable

 

        1,051,968

 

       3,325,072

 

Due to related parties

 

           417,000

 

          768,968

Total Current Liabilities

 

        2,647,694

 

       6,898,499

Total Liabilities

 

        2,647,694

 

       6,898,499

 

 

 

 

 

 

Members' equity

 

 

 

 

 

34,117,912 and  28,138,878 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017and December 31, 2016, respectively Additional paid-in capital, investor capital of $26,367,947 and vested unit options of $1,998,980 on December 31, 2017, and

 

                     - 

 

                    -

 

investor capital $21,036,988, vested warrants at $4,200, and vested unit options of $1,303,074 on December 31, 2016

 

      28,366,927

 

     22,344,262

 

Retained Deficit

 

     (30,831,431)

 

    (29,029,368)

Total Members' Deficit

 

       (2,464,504)

 

      (6,685,106)

Total Liabilities and Members' Deficit

 

 $        183,190

 

 $       213,393

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


-35-







           

Juneau Biosciences, LLC

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

License Income (Related Party)

 $     1,005,830

 

 $        877,560

Research & Development (Related Party)

 $     1,350,000

 

 $                    -

Consulting (Related Party)

 $          88,237

 

 $                    -

 

 

 

 $     2,444,067

 

 $         877,560

Operating Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative expenses

         1,855,485

 

             596,011

 

General and administrative expenses (Related Party)

            671,178

 

             990,021

 

Stock-based Compensation

            695,907

 

               71,851

 

Travel and entertainment

                9,064

 

                 4,654

 

Interest expense

         1,004,791

 

             463,558

 

Depreciation expense

                      -

 

                 3,377

 

Amortization expense

                9,711

 

                 9,575

Total Operating Expenses

         4,246,136

 

          2,139,047

Loss from opertions

        (1,802,069)

 

        (1,261,487)

Other Income (Expenses)

 

 

 

 

Other Income

                       6

 

 

Total Other Expenses

                       6

 

                      -

Net Loss before Income Taxes

        (1,802,063)

 

        (1,261,487)

Income Tax Benefit

                      -

 

                      -

Net Loss

 $    (1,802,063)

 

 $    (1,261,487)

Net Loss per Common Unit

 $             (0.06)

 

 $             (0.05)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average Number of Common Units Outstanding

       29,341,866

 

        27,782,968


 

-36-


                 

Juneau Bioscience, LLC

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

2017

Assets

 

 

 

 

Unaudited

 

Audited

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

$              148,527

 

$                  40,077

 

Total current assets

 

                 148,527

 

                    40,077

 

Other long-term assets

         27,159,139

 

                 152,824

Total assets

 

 

 

$         27,307,666

 

$                 192,901

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and member's equity

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 





 

 

Accounts payable

$                  2,243

 

 $                  23,786

 

 

Accrued liabilities

            1,255,674

 

            5,744,449

 

Total current liabilities

            1,257,917

 

            5,768,235

 

Long-term Liabilities

 

            1,398,968

 

            1,303,074

 

Member's equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

         57,902,036

 

         22,196,288

 

 

Accumulated deficit

       (33,251,255)

 

       (29,074,696)

 

Total member's equity

         24,650,781

 

          (6,878,408)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and member's equity

$          27,307,666

 

$                192,901

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


-37-








                 

Juneau Bioscience, LLC

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Years ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Unaudited

 

 Audited

Revenue from operations (net)

$                    2,554,037

 

$                   2,443,677

 

Gross profit from operations

            2,554,037

 

            2,443,677

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative

            4,973,927

 

            2,489,421

 

 

Total operating expense

            4,973,927

 

            2,489,421

 

Loss from operations

 

          (2,419,890)

 

                  (45,744)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense)

                              66

 

                           396

 

Net income / (loss)

 

$                  (2,419,824)

 

$                      (45,348)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Exhibit 99.02 contains BF Borgers CPA PC's Independent Auditor Opinion Letter for Juneau Bioscience, LLC's audited financial statement for years ending December 31, 2017 and 2016


-38-

ReNovo Biotech, Inc.

On March 28, 2016, the Company announced the acquisition of ReNovo Biotech, Inc. as its wholly owned subsidiary. The acquisition provides the Company access to ReNovo Biotech's cellular, tissue, biomaterial and regenerative medicine products and product candidates. This subsidiary is operated under the name Predictive Biotech, Inc. The Company issued 9,500,000 common shares to effect the acquisition , which is was recorded at a cost fair value of $14,087,000. The fair value of the trade secrets was determined to approximate the value of the common stock paid as consideration. The Company also recognized deferred tax liabilities and goodwill of $5,254,451

The purchase price was allocated to "trade secrets" including protocols to develop an amniotic allografts and umbilical cord allograft line of products in accordance with the provisions of ASC 805, Business Combinations .  Such trade secrets were determined to be recognizable apart from any form of goodwill and are "technology-based".

Aggregate amortization expense for the years 9 months ended June 30March 31, 2018,  2019 and 2017 March 31,2019 was approximately and $2,817,786, and $2,817,786, respectively. Aggregate amortization expense for the 3 months ended September 30, 2018, and 2017 was approximately $704,446, and $850,116, 2,113,339 and $2,113,339 respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for the developed technology consists of the following as of September 30March 31, 2018 2019:

       

 

 

 

 

Year Ending June 30

 

 

 

2019

 

   704,446





20192020

 

 

   2,817,786

2020

 

 

   2,817,786

       

2021

 

 

   2,460,739

Inception DX, LLC

On August 22, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement captioned "Securities Purchase Agreement" with the members of Inception DX, LLC ("Inception"), a Utah limited liability company. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company acquired Inception for 15,500,000 shares of common stock. Inception owns laboratory equipment, partial interest in database records for over 31,900,000 individuals for use in genetics research, 400,000 units in Juneau Biosciences, LLC, initial CLIA registration, CLIA lab protocols, and other assets. Once the CLIA registration is completed, Inception will be used as a CLIA -certified laboratory by Predictive Technology Group, Inc. and its affiliates.

The stock issued was for cash, laboratory equipment, membership units in Juneau Biosciences, LLC units ("Juneau units"), and trade secrets related to the DNA database and protocols related to a future laboratory use as a CLIA lab. The cash was valued at face value.  The Juneau units was were valued based on the valued value assigned when the Company entered into a subscription to purchase units of Juneau ($1.10 per unit). The laboratory equipment was valued at market value as it had not been used and the Company is aware of the approximate market purchase price.  It will be classified as equipment with a 5-year lifeprice of similar equipment. The equipment will be depreciated over 5 years. The proprietary data, DNA library, protocols, research and methods are classified as a trade secret in our industry.  Therefore, the Company determined to allocate the remaining value of the assets purchased as a trade secret with a 15-year lifetrade secrets in our industry. The Company will amortize the trade secrets over an estimated useful life of 15 years.

The stock price on 8/22/August 22, 2018 was $0.92/share.  Indicating , iIndicating a purchase price of $14,260,000 requiring allocation:


     

-

Cash

$799,980

 

 

 

-

Lab equipment

700,000

 

 

 

-

Investment in minority interest

440,000

 

 

 

-

Trade secrets

12,320,00012,320,020

 

 

 

 

Total Purchase Price

$14,260,000

 


-37-39-

The financial statements presented above reflect the increase of this minority interest investment.  The 400,000 units acquired in this acquisition increased our ownership less than 1%, and as such, the Company has not acquired more than 50% of Juneau, in total, as of September 30March 31, 2018 2019.  The $440,000 allocated to Investment in Minority Interest is offset by our estimated share of the loss in Juneau's operations for the quarter six months ended September 30March 31, 2018 2019.

 

Aggregate amortization expense for the trade secrets for the 9 months ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2019, was approximately and $583,896, and $0 respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for the trade secrets consists of the following as of March 31, 2019:

   

 

 





Year Ending June 30

 

2019

   $143,895

2020

      821,297

2021

      821,297

2022

      821,297

Thereafter

 9,138,337

Taueret Laboratories, LLC

On August 22, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement captioned "Asset Purchase Agreement" (the "Purchase Agreement") with Taueret Laboratories, LLC and its members. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued warrants exercisable for 16,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The warrants were exercisable at fair market value of the Company's common stock on the closing date. In consideration for the warrants, the Company acquired (i) approximately 1,000 degenerative disc disease related DNA samples, related family records, relevant clinical records (including approximately 600 affected probands) and 800 ancestry matched control samples, (ii) whole exome sequencing data on approximately 300 degenerative disc disease samples, over 800 local controls, and published reference populations, together with initial analysis of the markers, (iii) project plan, study paperwork, promotional study and materials used in the research study, (iv) exclusive use of a DNA biobank that has a collection of over 300,000 samples for multiple diseases that the Company may target, (v) the remaining interest in database records for over 31,900,000 individuals for use in genetics research, and (vi) other assets.

 

The warrants issued are for proprietary data and methods that are otherwise a trade secret in our industry. Therefore, the Company determined to classify the assets purchased as trade secrets with a 15-year life. The Company ran used a Black Scholes calculation to determine valuation of the warrants to determine assign the purchase price of $15,160,38513,860,000.

The fair value of the warrants was determined using the following inputs to the Black Scholes model:

       

Risk-free interest rate

 

2.7%

 

Expected dividend yield

 

0%

 

Expected life (in years)

 

 5.0

 

Expected volatility

 

150%

 

Expected volatility was calculated from the historical volatility of the Company's common stock.

Aggregate amortization expense for the trade secrets for the 9 months ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018, was approximately and $658,727 and $0 respectively


-40-

Estimated amortization expense for the trade secrets consists of the following as of December 31, 2018:

   

 

 

Year Ending June 30

 

2019

   $ 148,787

2020

      923,958

2021

      923,958

2022

     923,958





Thereafter

 10,280,612

On December 19, 2018 the Company executed a merger with the shareholders of Regenerative Medical Technologies, Inc. ("RMT"), a Utah corporation. The Company acquired RMT for 10,000,000 shares of common stock. RMT holds various assets including (i) models, methods and protocols for collection birthing tissue and DNA samples, (ii) patient registry models, methods and protocols to collect clinical outcomes and electronic medical records, and (iii) designs and methodologies relating to many initiatives that are complementary to anticipated product offerings and ongoing research, and (iv) other assets.

The stock price on the date of acquisition of $0.92 indicated fair value of common stock paid as consideration of $9,200,000. In addition, the Company recognized a deferred tax liability of $3,066,667 related to the differences between book and tax basis arising from the acquisition, resulting in a total purchase price of 12,066,667. The Company determined that the assets acquired qualify for treatment as trade secrets within industry.  The trade secrets will be amortized over an estimated useful life of 10 years.  

Aggregate amortization expense for the 3 and 9 months ended March 31, 2019 was $289,473, and $385,965 respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for the assets consists of the following as of March 31, 2019:

     

Year Ending June 30

 

 

2019

$

   289,473

2020

 

1,226,667

2021

 

1,226,667

2022

 

1,226,667

2023

 

1,226,667

Thereafter

 

6,684,562

 


-41-

 

On March 22, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of Taueret Laboratories, LLC ("Taueret") pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement (as amended, the "Purchase Agreement"), dated January 1, 2019. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding units of Taueret. The Company and its affiliates plan to use Taueret's CLIA-certified laboratory to perform diagnostic testing services.

The Purchase Agreement also specifies that the Company may, at its sole discretion, put certain patents related to the diagnosis and treatment of Preeclampsia (the "Preeclampsia IP") back to the members of Taueret at any time prior to June 30, 2020 (the "Preeclampsia Option"). On June 30, 2020, an additional payment $8,547,000 in cash will become due if the Company has not exercised the Preeclampsia Option. After considering the relevant accounting guidance, we determined that the Preeclampsia Option was not part of the business combination with Taueret, because the Preeclampsia Option was included in the Purchase Agreement and structured primarily to benefit the acquirer.

The Company acquired Taueret and the Preeclampsia Option for total consideration of $931,817, net of cash acquired of $85,964. The consideration was paid as 552,995 shares of the Company's common stock. The common stock was valued at the closing price on the date of the closing of the merger, adjusted for a 20% discount for lack of marketability related to a contractually stipulated lockup provision with a period of one year. The consideration was allocated between the business combination and the Preeclampsia Option on a relative fair value basis with $917,511 allocated to the business combination and $100,000 allocated to the Preeclampsia Option. The Preeclampsia Option was recorded in intangible assets and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the period the option is exercisable.



Total consideration transferred was allocated to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as of the acquisition date.  

Management estimated the fair value of tangible and intangible assets and liabilities in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance for business combinations and utilized the services of third-party valuation consultants.  These amounts are provisional and may be adjusted during the measurement period, which expires no later than one year from the acquisition date, if new information is obtained that, if known, would have affected the amounts recognized as of the acquisition date:

     

 

Assets:

Fair Value

Current assets

$

663,262

Laboratory equipment

190,397

Software

239,000

Intangible Assets

311,000

Total assets acquired

1,403,659

Liabilities:

 

Accrued liabilities

(68,181)

Capital lease obligation

(54,291)

Deferred tax liabilities

(90,919)

Total liabilities assumed

(213,391)

Bargain purchase gain

(272,757)

Total fair value of purchase price

$

917,511

Consideration allocated to Preeclampsia Option

 

100,000

Total consideration

$

1,017,511

Less: Cash acquired

 

(85,964)

Total consideration transferred

$

931,817


-42-


Identifiable intangible assets

The Company acquired intangible assets that consisted of an internally developed laboratory information management system which had an estimated fair value of $239,000, CLIA regulatory licenses with a fair value of $295,000, and customer relationships with a fair value of $16,000. The fair value of the software was determined using the replacement cost method.  The fair value of the CLIA licenses were estimated using the excess earnings method. The estimated net cash flows were discounted using a discount rate of 22%, which is based on the estimated internal rate of return for the acquisition and represents the rate that market participants might use to value the intangible assets. The projected cash flows were based on key assumptions such as estimates of revenues and operating profits. The Company will amortize the intangible assets on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 15 years for the CLIA license and 5 years for the software and customer relationships. This amortization is deductible for income tax purposes.  

Bargain purchase gain

Any excess of fair value of acquired net assets over the purchase price (negative goodwill) has been recognized as a gain in the period the acquisition was completed. We have reassessed whether all acquired assets and assumed liabilities have been identified and recognized and performed remeasurements to verify that the consideration paid, assets acquired, and liabilities assumed have been properly valued. The remaining excess has been recognized as a gain in other income and expense in the consolidated statement of operations. The bargain purchase gain partly resulted from the allocation of the total consideration between the business combination and the Preeclampsia Option. We also believe we were able to negotiate a bargain price due to the desire of the sellers to induce the Company to purchase the Preeclampsia Option contemporaneously with the business combination.

 



Consolidated Results and Non-Segmented Items - Fiscal 2018 vs. Fiscal 2017

 

Revenues from operations (net) for fiscal 2018 totaled $16,624,336 compared to $2,585,362 for fiscal 2017. The increase of $14,038,974 is a result of an expansion of our sales force and distribution networks leading to increased sales of our HCT/Ps.

 

Cost of goods sold ("COGS") includes expenses associated with acquisition and processing, manufacture (including material and direct labor), property and equipment depreciation, shipping, and other direct expenses relating to our HCT/Ps. Our gross profit during 2018 was $12,653,081 compared to $1,834,057 for fiscal 2017. The increased gross profit resulted from increased sales and efficiencies introduced into our manufacturing processes.

 

Sales and marketing expenses were $12,680,741 for fiscal 2018 compared to $1,897,543 for fiscal 2017. The increased sales and marketing expenses resulted from corresponding increases in sales, as well as $7.5M in warrants issued to sales management as they met predetermined milestones based on revenue growth.

 

Research and development expenses were $1,896,092 for fiscal 2018 compared to $84,729 for fiscal 2017. The increased research and development expenses resulted from increased focus on product development, streamlining manufacturing methods and additional proprietary research and development work primarily relating to our HCT/Ps.  

 

General and Administrative expenses for fiscal 2018 were $5,827,891 compared to $946,754 for fiscal 2017. The increased general and administrative expenses resulted from increased management headcount and warrants issued for consulting relating to all business entities.

 

Amortization and depreciation expenses for fiscal 2018 were $4,573,534 compared to $3,693,579 for fiscal 2017. The reason for the increase in amortization and depreciation expenses relate primarily to the expense of costs relating to our acquisitions

 


-3843-








On August 1, 2016, the Company entered into agreements to acquire convertible, unsecured notes receivable from Juneau from existing noteholders in exchange for stock of the Company. The collection of amounts owed on said notes receivable is subject to a subordination agreement with a third-party creditor of Juneau that is owed the principal amount of $700,000 plus accrued interest on an obligation that comes due July 31, 2018. In anticipation of this event, on June 15, 2017, an amendment was also made to the restated agreement to subordinate the debt Juneau owes to PTG. The face amount of the notes acquired was $2,870,380 and 5,740,760 shares of common stock were issued. The notes bear interest payable in Juneau units at 12% and are convertible into Class A Units of Juneau at the rate of $1.00 per unit. Principal and accrued interest are due in a single installment on August 1, 2018. Upon further review using the OTC value at the date of closure, it was determined that a price per share of .78 cents was approximate market value.  Therefore, the value of the shares given should be $4,473,774, an increase of $1,603,394. This discount at the date of the share transfers is then considered an impairment loss on the date of the acquisition of the notes. There was no corresponding impairment loss in fiscal 2018.

 

Consolidated Results and Non-Segmented Items - 3 Three and nine months ended September 2018 vs. 3 March 31, 2019 compared to three and nine months ended September 2017March 31, 2018

 

 

Revenues from operations (net) for 3 the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 totaled $8,063,800 compared to $2,005,171 for 3 March 31, 2019 totaled $11,295,618 and $30,046,456, respectively, compared to $4,232,650 and $20,574,052 for the three and nine months ended September 30March 31, 2017 2018. The increase of $6,058,629 7,062,968 and $7,062,968, respectively, is a result of an expansion of our sales force and distribution networks leading to increased sales of our HCT/Ps. 

 

Cost of goods sold ("COGS") includes expenses associated with acquisition and processing, manufacture (including material and direct labor), property and equipment depreciation, shipping, and other direct expenses relating to our HCT/Ps. Our gross profit for 3 three and nine months ended September 30March 31, 2018 was $5,197,066  2019 was $6,522,286 and $19,165,432 respectively, compared to $1,106,092 for 3 2,438,287 and $5,918,492 for the three and nine  months ended September 30March 31, 2017 2018. The increased gross profit resulted from increased sales and efficiencies introduced into our manufacturing processes. 

 

Sales and marketing expenses for 3 three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 was $2,422,718 compared to $549,549 for 3 March 31, 2019 was $2,888,309 and $8,726,902, respectively, compared to $4,321,441 and $10,040,226, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30March 31, 2017 2018. The increased sales and marketing expenses resulted from corresponding increases in sales and an increase in the number of distributors. 

 

 

Research and development expenses for 3 three and nine months ended September 30March 31, 2018 was $605,390  2019 was $1,458,265 and $3,823,908, respectively, compared to $12,500 for 3 366,656 and $416,536, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30March 31, 2017 2018. The increased research and development expenses resulted from increased focus on product development, streamlining manufacturing methods and additional proprietary research and development work primarily relating to our HCT/Ps. Additionally, we have invested significant amounts in lab readiness in anticipation of the sale of diagnostic products.   

 

 

General and Administrative expenses for 3 months ended September 30, 2018 was $2,563,440 compared to $359,394 for 3 months ended September 30, 2017. The increased three and nine months ended March 31, 2019 was $4,835,652 and $10,380,413 respectively, compared to $1,360,304 and $4,700,683 for three and nine months ended March 31, 2018. The changes in general and administrative expenses resulted from increased management headcount and stock options issued for consulting services relating to all business entities, accounting, and support headcount in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018.

 



Amortization and depreciation expenses for 3 three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 was $1,672,430 compared to $748,653 for 3 March 31, 2019 was $2,374,006 and $6,075,090, respectively, compared to $1,148,262 and $3,386,626, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30March 31, 2017 2018. The reason for the increase in amortization and depreciation expenses relate primarily to the expense of costs relating to our acquisitions.

 

 

 

-44-

 

   Business Segment Results - Fiscal 2018 vs. Fiscal 2017

 

Substantially all of the revenues, COGS, sales and marketing expenses, and impairment loss related to the HCT/Ps business. During this period the molecular diagnostic or therapeutics products were under development and none had launched. Approximately $1,366,028 and $946,754 of the general and administrative expenses are attributable the HCT/Ps business during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, respectively, approximately $2,900,092 and $2,820,681 of the amortization and depreciation expenses are attributable the HCT/Ps during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, approximately $8,216,888 and $1,116,586 of the warrants and option expenses are attributable the HCT/Ps during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, and the remaining portion of said expenses are attributable to the diagnostic and therapeutic segment.  

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources:

 

Cash and cash equivalents as of September 30March 31, 2018 2019, June 30, 2018, and June 30, 2017 were $1,056,7801,826,420, $1,206,139, and $968,202, respectively.   Our working capital deficit was $556,1144,305,163, $1,032,312 and $82,338 as of September 30March 31, 2018 2019, June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017, respectively.

 


-39-




Net cash flows provided by operating activities was $609,477 for 3 months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $1,060,940 from $451,463 used by operating activities for 3 months ended September 30, 20173,059,291 for the nine months ended March 31, 2019, an increase of $5,628,091 from the nine months ended March 31, 2018.  The increase in the comparative 3-month nine-month periods is due to increasing sales and lowering inventories. Net cash flows used in by operating activities in fiscal 2018 was $288,999, a decrease of $1,175,597 from $886,599 provided by operating activities in fiscal 2017. The decrease in fiscal 2018 was primarily due to an increase in net loss, and in increase in our inventory balance. 

 

Net cash flows provided used by investing activities was $132,798 3,467,143 for 3 the nine months ended September 30March 31, 2018 2019, an increase of $2,231,049 from $2,098,251 used in investing activities for 3 881,925 from the nine months ended September 30March 31, 2017 2018.  The increase in the comparative 3-month nine-month periods is due to common stock being issued for acquisitionscosts associated with software projects and lab expansion and payments made under our subscription agreements with Juneau Biosciences, LLC.  Net cash flows used in by investing activities was $4,049,157 in fiscal 2018, an increase of $1,989,672 from $2,059,486 used in investing activities in fiscal 2017.  The increase in fiscal 2018 was due primarily to cash paid for our equity method investments, namely investment in Juneau Biosciences, LLC.

 

Net cash flows used in financing activities was $891,634 for 3 months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $3,586,634 from $2,695,000 provided by financing activities was $1,028,133 for 3 the nine months ended September 30March 31, 2017.  The increase  2019, an decrease of $3,580,147 from the nine months ended March 31, 2018.  The decrease in the comparative 3-month periods nine-month period is due to a decrease in payments from common stock subscriptions wound down in current period and the Company began payments for an equity subscription payable in the current period.  Net cash flows provided by financing activities was $4,576,093 in fiscal 2018, an increase of $2,439,512 from $2,136,581 provided by financing activities in fiscal 2017.  The increase in fiscal 2018 was due to cash payments for stock, stock subscriptions, and for stock subscriptions with attached warrants.  

 

We believe we have sufficient funds to execute our business plan. However, our business plans may change , or unforeseen events may occur which affect the amount of funds required. If additional funds are not obtained if and when required, the lack thereof may have a material adverse effect on the Company and could require us to cease operations. Further, there is no assurance that future funding will be available or that any future funding will be on terms which are favorable to us or our current stockholders.

 

ITEM 3.  PROPERTIES .

 

We occupy a 2,800 square-foot facility in Salt Lake City, Utah under the terms of an operating lease on a month-to-month basis. This facility is used primarily to support our administrative staff.

 

We lease a second 15,164 square-foot office and laboratory facility in Salt Lake City, Utah under the terms of an operating lease expiring in December October 2019 which serves as our HCT/Ps laboratory.

 

We believe our current facilities are adequate to meet our needs through the end of 2019. Thereafter, we believe that additional space will be required and that suitable additional or alternative space will be available on commercially reasonable terms as needed.


-45-

ITEM 4.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of December 1May 20, 2018,  2019 by (i) each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding common stock; (ii) each of our officers and directors; and (iii) all of our directors and officers as a group.



 

As of December 1May 20, 2018 2019, the Company had outstanding 239,046,403 272,535,397 shares of common stock, no preferred stock, stock options exercisable for 5,783,500 29,280,500 shares of common stock with an exercise price range from $0.50 to $1.23 2.19 and warrants exercisable for 59,018,520 64,018,520 shares of common stock with exercise prices of between $0.50 to $.92.

 


-40->





         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

of

Beneficial Owner(1)(2)

 

Amount of Common Stock Beneficially Owned

 

 

 

Percentage

of

Ownership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Position

John Sorrentino(3)

-0-

0.00%

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Ron Barhorst (4)

-0-

0.00%

Director

Senator Orrin G. Hatch (5)

-0-

0.00%

Director

Jay Moyes (6)

-0-

0.00%

Director

Bradley Robinson (37)

42,492,482

17.7815.59%

Member of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President

Michael Dey, Ph.D. (48)

750,000

0.310.28%

Member of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer, Predictive Therapeutics, Inc.

Merle Ferguson

6,525,438

2.73%

Member of the Board of Directors

Simon Brewer (59)

133,333300,000

0.060.11%

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Paul Evans (610)

836,000

0.350.31%

Chief Operating Officer

John Nelson, M.D. (7)

150,000

0.06%

Chief Medical Officer

Bruce Forrest, M.D. (8)

300,000

0.13%

Chief Development Officer

Timothy Lacy (9)

12,000,000

4.78%

Executive Vice President, Predictive Technology Group, Inc.

President, Predictive Biotech, Inc.

Michael Herbert (10(11)

66,667

0.030.02%

Chief Marketing Officer

Eric Olson (11(12)

7,500,000

3.142.75%

Executive Vice President, Chief Executive Officer, Predictive Biotech, Inc.

Total Officers and Directors (11 10 persons)

70,753,92051,945,149

29.3719.06%

 


_____________

-46-

(1)  Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the US Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), which include holding voting and investment power with respect to the securities. Shares subject to options or warrants currently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the total number of shares beneficially owned by the designated person but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage for any other person.


(2)  Except where otherwise indicated, the address of the beneficial owner is deemed to be the same address as the Company.

(3) Does not include options exercisable for 2,000,000 shares of common stock that do not vest within sixty days of the date of this registration statement.  

(4) Does not include options exercisable for 750,000 shares of common stock that do not vest within sixty days of the date of this registration statement.

(5) Does not include options exercisable for 250,000 shares of common stock that do not vest within sixty days of the date of this registration statement.
(6) Does not include options exercisable for 250,000 shares of common stock that do not vest within sixty days of the date of this registration statement.

(3(7)  The amount indicated includes 20,000,000 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Robinson. Also includes 4,492,482 shares of common stock owned by Axis Capital Partners, LLC, an entity in which Mr. Robinson is a manager and has a beneficial interest, 18,000,000 shares of common stock owned by Rhea Holdings, LLC, an entity in which Trisha L. Robinson, Mr. Robinson's wife, is the manager and shares in which Trisha L. Robinson and children of Mr. Robinson have a beneficial interest. Does not include options exercisable for 4,000,000 shares of common stock that do not vest within sixty days of the date of this registration statement.

 (4(8)  Includes options exercisable for 750,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.50 per share.  (5)  Includes options exercisable for 133,333 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.80. Does not include options exercisable for 166,667 750,000 shares of common stock that do not vest within sixty days of the date of this registration statement.

 (6(9)  Includes options exercisable for 300,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.80 per share. Does not include options exercisable for 1,200,000 shares of common stock that do not vest within sixty days of the date of this registration statement.

(10)  Includes 336,000 shares of common stock and options exercisable for 500,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.78 per share. Does not include options exercisable for 1,500,000 shares of common stock that do not vest within sixty days of the date of this registration statement.   

 (7)  Includes options exercisable for 150,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.94. Does not include options exercisable for 150,000 shares of common stock that do not vest within sixty days of the date of this registration statement.  

 (8)  Includes options exercisable for 300,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.50 per share.

 (9)  Includes warrants exercisable for 12,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.50 per share.

(10(11) Includes options exercisable for 66,667 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.94 per share. Does not include options exercisable for 133,333 633,333 shares of common stock that do not vest within sixty days of the date of this registration statement.  

(11(12) Includes 7,500,000 shares of common stock owned by Integrity Trust Company, LLC, an entity in which Mr. Olson is a manager and has a beneficial interest. Does not include options exercisable for 1,500,000 shares of common stock that do not vest within sixty days of the date of this registration statement.   


 

-41-47-

ITEM 5.  DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS .

 

The following table provides information concerning our officers and directors. All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified.

 

 





         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME

 

AGE

 

POSITION

John Sorrentino

 

64

 

Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

 

 

 

 

Ron Barhorst

 

61

 

Director

 

 

 

 

 

Senator Orrin G. Hatch

 

85

 

Director

 

 

 

 

 

Jay Moyes

 

65

 

Director

 

 

 

 

 

Bradley Robinson

 

4950

 

Chief Executive Officer/President/Director

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Dey, Ph.D.

 

67

 

CEO Predictive Therapeutics, LLC/Director

 

 

 

 

 

Merle Ferguson

 

72

 

Director

 

 

 

 

 

Simon Brewer

 

40

 

Chief Financial Officer /Treasurer

 

 

 

 

 

Paul Evans

 

55

 

Chief Operating Officer

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John Nelson, M.D.

 

74

 

Chief Medical Officer

 

 

 

 

 

Bruce Forrest, M.D.

 

56

 

Chief Development Officer

 

 

 

 

 

Eric Olson

 

55

 

Executive Vice President Predictive Technology Group, Inc./Chief Executive Officer - Predictive Biotech, Inc.

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Timothy Lacy

 

50

 

Executive Vice President - Predictive Technology Group, Inc./President - Predictive Biotech, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Herbert

 

57

 

Executive Vice President - Predictive Technology Group, Inc./Vice President, Marketing - Predictive Biotech, Inc.

 

-42
-48-


BIOGRAPHY

 

John Sorrentino was elected as Chairman of the Board in October of 2018.  Mr. Sorrentino currently serves as Vice President & Chief Operating Officer, Pfizer Vaccine Research & Development, where he is responsible for the strategic deployment and management of financial, physical and human resources across nine vaccine research & development sites in seven countries. Mr. Sorrentinomanages Sorrentino manages a broad mix of financial, facility, staffing clinical testing and systems initiatives to support the vaccine portfolio. These efforts span the entire research and development life cycle from early-stage discovery projects through product-registration activities. Mr. Sorrentino is a member of the leadership team that developed and licensed Prevnar 13, the most commercially successful vaccine franchise in history. In his role with Pfizer, Mr. Sorrentino also manages clinical laboratory



services and develops staffing, capital, contracting and other assay-strategies required to assess human immune responses to vaccine candidates and to support vaccine label claims. As Pearl River Site Head, Mr. Sorrentino manages a broad spectrum of site operations. He directs external communications, community relations, colleague enrichment/engagement, diversity and other site-related programs. Mr. Sorrentino has more than 35 years of senior management experience in the life-sciences.  He has held leadership roles in private and public companies as well as government and non-profit institutions focused on improving the public health.  Prior to joining Wyeth/Pfizer in 2003, Mr. Sorrentino held executive management positions in several organizations that provided neonatal screening and related clinical services.  In these roles, Mr. Sorrentino pioneered laboratory advances to create efficiency and competitive advantage that led to the expansion of neonatal screening for treatable genetic conditions throughout the world. During his career, Mr. Sorrentino has held final profit and loss responsibility for several organizations and he has been a founder of three companies.  He has led mergers and acquisitions and developed successful exit strategies for founders.  Mr. Sorrentino has also been a registered lobbyist appearing before state legislators, the US congress and professional societies on a variety of health care and other policy issues. Mr. Sorrentino earned his BA in Chemistry from the University of Massachusetts and MBA from Northeastern University.

 

Mr. Ron Barhorst has been a director since March 2019. Mr. Barhorst worked for ING and ING's predecessor companies for 25 years. During his tenure he held a broad array of roles. Most recently Mr. Barhorst was the President and CEO of three (3) broker dealers; ING Financial Advisers, LLC, ING Investment Advisors, LLC, and Systematized Benefits Administrators, Inc. He was also the head of ING's financial advisory business in the US. Mr. Barhorst retired from ING on December 31, 2012. His early career with ING was dedicated to the development of the qualified retirement plan market. Ron's roles included Regional Manager, District Manager, Regional Vice President and National Head of Health, Education, and Government Sales. Much of his career included appointments to various company boards, and executive level committees. He was also responsible for a large portion of ING's U.S. based securities registered representative distribution.

 

Prior to joining ING, Ron worked as the Head of Residential Services for the Montgomery County (Ohio) Board of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities and was a member of the Governor's council on deinstitutionalization. Ron created a not-for-profit company, Choices in Community Living, Inc., where he served as the Executive Director. Ron has served on numerous not-for-profit boards including the California Business Roundtable for Education Excellence. He is currently the Chairman of the California State University Board of Governors (system wide foundation) and head of the Executive Committee. Ron has held Chairmanship for the past ten (10) years and has been a member of the board since 2000. Ron is a 1982 graduate of  Wright State University and holds a degree in Biology. Ron and his wife, Mitzi, who is also a 1982 graduate of Wright State University, live in Waterford Connecticut.

 


-49-


Senator Orrin G. Hatch has been a director since February 2019. Senator Hatch is an attorney and retired politician who served as a U.S. Senator from Utah for 42 years. First elected in 1976, he was the longest-serving Republican U.S. Senator in history.  Senator Hatch served as either the chair or ranking minority member of the Senate Judiciary Committee from 1993 to 2005. He previously chaired the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions from 1981 to 1987. Senator Hatch also served as Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. On January 3, 2015, after the 114th United States Congress was sworn in, Hatch became President pro tempore of the Senate. Senator Hatch retired from the U.S. Senate in 2019.

 

Mr. Jay Moyes has been a director since February 2019. Mr. Moyes previously served as Chief Financial Officer and Director of the publicly traded biomaterials company Amedica Corporation, now SINTX Technologies, where


he managed the company's IPO and listing on NASDAQ, and as Chief Financial Officer at publicly traded CareDx, a molecular diagnostics company where he introduced a strategy to reach profitability. Prior to that he held senior finance positions including Chief Financial Officer during his 14-year tenure at publicly traded Myriad Genetics.  In addition to overseeing all financial aspects at Myriad as the company transitioned from 10 to more than 900 employees, he was instrumental in raising more than $500 million in public and private financings. He previously was Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Genmark, a private genetics company. Mr. Moyes began his career in public accounting at KPMG and serves on the Boards of Directors of Achieve Life Sciences (NASDAQ:ACHV), BioCardia (OTC/QB: BCDA) and Puma Biotechnologies (NYSE:PBYI). In addition to Amedica, he previously was a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of both Osiris Therapeutics (NASDAQ:OSIR) and Integrated Diagnostics. He also served as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Utah Life Science Association. Mr. Moyes holds a BA in economics from Weber State University and an MBA from the University of Utah.

 

Mr. Mr. Bradley Robinson was appointed CEO of Predictive Technology Group, Inc. in March, 2015. Mr. Robinson brings operational, business development and financing experience to Predictive Technology Group, Inc. The majority of this experience was developed during early stage structuring of ventures in the areas of pharmaceuticals, medical device and information technology. He was a founding member of LifeCode Genetics, LLC in 2011 and Predictive Therapeutics, LLC in 2013, both of which are now wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. Mr. Robinson has been a founding member of other ventures in healthcare, one of which, Specialized Health Products International, Inc., was publicly traded until its acquisition in March of 2008 by C.R. Bard.  Mr. Robinson was the CEO and co-founder of Infusive Technologies, LLC from November, 2004 until September, 2008 when it was acquired by Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a specialty injectable pharmaceutical products company. As part of the acquisition, Mr. Robinson became President of the medical device division of Sagent Pharmaceuticals. He left Sagent Pharmaceuticals in 2010 to become Vice President of Business Development of Juneau BioSciences, which develops and commercializes genetic tests related to women's healthcare.  He was responsible for developing strategic partnerships and the company's capitalization. Mr. Robinson studied accounting at the University of Utah and earned an MBA/MIM from the Graduate School of International Management (Thunderbird).


Mr. Michael Dey, Ph.D., was elected as a member of the Board of the Company and CEO of Predictive Therapeutics, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, in June of 2016. Prior to joining Predictive Therapeutics, Dr. Dey was an executive at Wyeth where he was the President of Scientific Affairs for Wyeth's Women's Health Care business. Prior, Dr. Dey was the President of Wyeth Women's Health Care which he managed for 7 years. Dr. Dey had worldwide responsibility for this consolidated unit of more than $3 billion annually that included all of Wyeth's Women's Health Care resources globally. Prior to his leadership role in women's health care he served as Vice President, General Manager of ESI Pharma, Inc. In 1995, with Wyeth's acquisition of American Cyanamid and Lederle Standard Products, Dr. Dey became President of ESI Lederle, Inc.  As President of ESI Lederle, his responsibilities included directing one of the largest generic drug companies in the U.S. with more than $500 million in sales, approximately 150 employees in R&D and 100 employees in Marketing and Sales. ESI Lederle sold both oral and injectable products that included Tubex®, the prefilled syringe delivery system. Dr. Dey received a BS in Biology/Chemistry from Western Washington University, a Pharmacy degree from the University of Washington, a MS degree in Pharmacology-Toxicology from the University of California, Davis, and a PhD in Pharmacology-Toxicology from Washington State University.

 

Mr. Merle Ferguson became Chairman of the Board of the Company on July 8, 2013, and subsequently on December 1, 2016 he also became CEO and President of the Company.  Prior to that, he had no relationship with the Company. Mr. Ferguson attended Yakima Valley College from 1964-1966 with a major in forestry and a minor in Business Management. In April of 1966, he enlisted in the United States Marine Corps, serving two tours in Vietnam, and was honorably discharged in 1970. From 2001 to the present, Mr. Ferguson has served as Chairman, Secretary, Treasurer and majority shareholder of Predictive From January, 2009 to the present, Mr. Ferguson has served as Chairman, President, CEO, CFO and majority owner of Element Global, Inc., located in Virginia Beach, Virginia.   Beginning in May of 2014, Mr. Ferguson also became Chairman and President of Element Global.  From January, 2002 to 2014, Mr. Ferguson served as an Officer and Director of Gold Rock. Since 2014, he has also served



as President, Chairman and CEO of Gold Rock, located in Virginia Beach, Virginia. The Board reviewed Mr. Ferguson's background and it considers him qualified to fill this position, due to his extensive business experience and work with public companies.

-43-

 


-50-


Mr. Simon Brewer , CPA, was appointed to the Company's Chief Accounting Officer in January of 2018, and Chief Financial Officer in July of 2018.  Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Brewer served as Chief Financial Officer of Norbest, LLC from 2016 to 2017, where he was responsible for Norbest's finance, accounting, HR and IT functions.  Prior to joining Norbest, Mr. Brewer was Vice President, Finance and IT for Wilson Electronics, LLC from 2013 to 2016. Reporting directly to the CEO of Wilson Electronics, Mr. Brewer oversaw significant growth for the electronics company operating in all 50 states and internationally in several countries.  Mr.  Brewer assisted heavily in building scalable processes, modernizing the business, international growth in Asia, and an acquisition of a main competitor. Before that, he was Senior Director and Corporate Controller for Backcountry.com, Inc. from 2009 to 2013. Mr. Brewer implemented Sarbanes Oxley when Backcountry.com was purchased by a publicly traded Company, Liberty Interactive, as well as started the FP&A function for modernizing data driven decision making.  Mr. Brewer started his accounting career as a CPA for KPMG LLP from 2005 to 2009, working on audits, IPOs, bankruptcies, divestitures, and acquisitions. Mr. Brewer received his BA and Masters of Accounting degrees, along with a minor in Russian, from The University of Utah. Mr. Brewer is a CPA licensed in Utah and Nevada.

 

Mr. Paul Evans was appointed Chief Operating Officer in June of 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Evans was Vice President of Intellectual Property at Vivint, Inc. from 2014 to 2015, where he led the development, management, and enforcement of Vivint's intellectual property portfolio across the company's entire platform of smart home solutions, including security and surveillance, smart home control, wireless internet, and cloud storage. From 2010 to 2013, Mr. Evans was General Counsel, Executive VP of Corporate Development, and Chief Governance and Compliance Officer at InTouch Health, a leading provider of telehealth enterprise network and managed services to hospitals and healthcare systems for the delivery of specialty clinical care to patients. Prior to joining InTouch Health, Mr. Evans was an attorney with Stoel Rives LLC from 2008 to 2010.  From 2000 to 2008, he was General Counsel, VP of Business Development, Chief Governance and Compliance Officer of Specialized Health Products International, Inc., a medical device company acquired by C.R. Bard in 2008. Mr. Evans earned his BS in Mechanical Engineering, JD, and MBA degrees from The University of Utah.

 

John Nelson, M.D., was appointed Chief Medical Officer of the Company in January, 2018. Dr. Nelson, MD, MPH is an obstetrician and gynecologist from Salt Lake City, Utah. Dr. Nelson has served as President of the American Medical Association, Salt Lake County Medical Society and the Utah Medical Association.  He was also chair of the Finance and Planning Committee of the World Medical Association. He served on the Advisory Committee to the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as well as on the advisory committee for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ.)  He has been a lecturer on detecting and preventing interpersonal violence having served as spokesperson for the American Medical Association Alliance.  He was a charter member of the Prospective Payment Assessment Commission (ProPAC) now known as MedPAC.

 

Bruce Forrest, M.D., was appointed Chief Development Officer in November of 2018. Prior to joining our Company, Dr. Forrest was President and Founder of Aeolian Advisors Corporation from 2013 to 2018, where he worked with clients to identify appropriate investment opportunities among small and emerging growth biotechnology and medical device companies. From 2010 to 2013, Dr. Forrest was a member of the Technical Advisory Board for Pure Earth (formerly Blacksmith Institute) that provided strategic advice to Blacksmith management and operational staff regarding best practices in pollution management and remediation techniques, and practical guidance on operational aspects of specific projects. From 2009 to 2010, Dr. Forrest was Senior Vice President, Vaccine Clinical Research Transition, Pfizer Vaccine Research, where he led the strategic and operational integration of the former Wyeth Vaccine Research & Development with the global Pfizer Vaccine Research organization, including structuring Japan, China and Asia-Pacific activities. Dr. Forrest was Senior Vice President, Late Phase Programs, Vaccines R&D, Wyeth Research at Wyeth Pharmaceuticals from 1997-2009, where he was responsible for all late phase development activities supporting both clinical and pharmaceutical science



development activities for vaccines in the Wyeth pipeline.  Dr. Forrest earned a Bachelor of Science in Medicine from the University of Adelaide School of Medicine and an MBA from Warwick Business School.

Mr. Eric Olson is Executive Vice President, and the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Predictive Biotech, Inc., since he joined the Company in 2016. His previous experience includes over 25 years developing and commercializing innovative technologies in devices, diagnostics, biologics and biomaterials. The last 8 years of his career, Mr. Olson has served in the role of either President, Chief Executive Officer or Board Member. Prior to joining Predictive Technology Group, Mr. Olson was the President and CEO for Cupertino, CA based Skeletal Kinetics. This Colson & Associates company developed and commercialized synthetic bone substitute products for Orthopedic and Spinal applications. Previous to that, Mr. Olson was the President, CEO and Board Member for Amedica Corporation. Amedica manufactured and distributed cortical and cancellous silicon nitride ceramic interbody devices for spine. In addition, the company distributed a line of HCT/Ps designed to work in conjunction with the ceramic biomaterial. Mr. Olson took Amedica Corporation public in 2014. Mr. Olson began his career with Smith & Nephew and has worked with Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic and Wright Medical in Sales and Marketing leadership roles. Mr. Olson earned his BS in Behavioral Science and Health Administration degrees from The University of Utah.  

 

-44-





Timothy Lacy was appointed Executive Vice President - Predictive Technology Group, Inc./President - Predictive Biotech, Inc. in February of 2017. From 2010 to 2017, he served as a founder and partner in FlagshipHealth Group, a health care consulting and sales outsourcing firm serving companies including Medtronic, Mayo Clinic and multiple Blue Cross and Blue Shield health plans. From 1991 to 2010, Mr. Lacy held senior management roles at UnitedHealth Group and Walgreens, including leadership positions across product, marketing, sales and corporate development. During his time at UnitedHealth Group, he led various strategic risk management teams including self-funding, pharmacy and network reimbursement strategies. He is recognized across the health care industry as an integration expert in the delivery, finance and administration of health care products and services. Mr. Lacy has broad experience commercializing acquisitions developed during his tenure at UnitedHealth Group, Walgreens and FlagshipHealth Group. Mr. Lacy earned a BA degree in Business and International Management from St. John's University.

 

Mr. Michael Herbert was appointed Chief Marketing Officer in February of 2017. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Herbert was Chief Marketing Officer at Flagship Health Group 2011 to 2017, where he worked with many of the top insurers on their go-to-market strategies. Mr. Herbert's focus has been on strategic brand building, channel alignment, product development and positioning across a broad spectrum of health care and consumer companies. He has held senior leadership and ownership positions in early through mid stage companies, including Bianchi (SVP Sales and marketing 1984 - 1996), Castelli (CEO, 1996 - 2004), Shock Doctor (Chief Sales and Marketing Officer 2004 - 2009), and DreamGuard (Chief Sales and Marketing Officer 2009 - 2011), leading to multiple successful transactions.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES


All Directors hold their office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are duly elected, and qualified.  Any vacancy occurring on the Board of Directors may be filled by the shareholders, or the Board of Directors.  A Director elected to fill a vacancy is elected for the unexpired term of his predecessor in office.  Any Directorship filled by reason of an increase in the number of Directors shall expire at the next shareholders' meeting in which Directors are elected, unless the vacancy is filled by the shareholders, in which case the term shall end on the later of (i) the next meeting of the shareholders or (ii) the term designated for the Director at the time of creation of the position being filled.


 

Committees: Meetings of the Board

 

The Company does not have a separate Compensation Committee, Audit Committee or Nominating Committee. These functions are done by the Board of Directors meeting as a whole. 

 

-51-

Committeesof the Board

 

We currently do not have an Audit,  Finance, Compensation, Executive Committee or Nominating Committee, or any other committee of the board of directors.  We have adopted a charter for the Executive Committee as well as charters for the other committees, in the event that we elect to implement themThe Company has a Compensation Committee, Audit Committee and a Nominating Committee. Each committee consists entirely of independent directors. The Board has adopted charters for these committees.  We post on our website at www.predtechgroup.com the charters of our Audit and Compliance, Compensation and Nominating Committees, our Code of Ethics, and any amendments or waivers thereto. We will provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of the charter for any of our committees.   In addition, we intend to post on our website all disclosures that are required by law concerning any amendments to our committees or their charters. The information contained in our website shall not constitute part of this filing.

For the areas where we don't have committees, such responsibilities are fulfilled by our board of directors and all of our directors participate in such responsibilities, one of whom is "independent" as defined under Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ's listing standards described below. Our financial position has made it extremely difficult to attract



and retain qualified independent board members.  Since we do not have any of the subject committees, other than our Executive Committee, our entire board of directors participates in all of the considerations with respect to our audit, finance, compensation, and nomination deliberations.

 

-45-




Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ's listing standards defines an "independent director" as a person other than an executive officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the issuer's board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.  The following persons shall not be considered independent:

- A director who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the company;

- A director who accepted or who has a Family Member who accepted any compensation from the Company in excess of $120,000 during any period of twelve consecutive months within the three years preceding the determination of independence, other than the following: (i) compensation for board or board committee service; (ii) compensation paid to a Family Member who is an employee (other than as an executive officer) of the Company; or (iii) benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary compensation.  Provided, however, that in addition to the requirements contained in this paragraph, audit committee members are also subject to additional, more stringent requirements under NASDAQ Rule 4350(d).

- A director who is a Family Member of an individual who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the Company as an executive officer;

- A director who is, or has a Family Member who is, a partner in, or a controlling stockholder or an executive officer of, any organization to which the Company made, or from which the Company received, payments for property or services in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed five percent of the recipient's consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more, other than the following: (i) payments arising solely from investments in the Company's securities; or (ii) payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs;

- A director of the issuer who is, or has a Family Member who is, employed as an executive officer of another entity where at any time during the past three years any of the executive officers of the issuer serve on the compensation committee of such other entity; or

- A director who is, or has a Family Member who is, a current partner of the Company's outside auditor, or was a partner or employee of the Company's outside auditor who worked on the Company's audit at any time during any of the past three years.

 

We hope to add qualified independent members of our board of directors at a later date, depending upon our ability to reach and maintain financial stability.

 



-52-








Our Board of Directors has determined, after considering all the relevant facts and circumstances, that Mr. Barhorst, Senator Hatch, Mr. Moyes and Mr.  Sorrentino are independent directors, as "independence" is defined by the listing standards of NASDAQ. This determination was made because these directors have no relationship with us that would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment.

-46-




Audit Committee

The entire board of directors performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written charter governs the actions of the board when performing the functions of what would generally be performed by an audit committee.  The board approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and interacts with the independent accountants to discuss issues related to financial reporting.  In addition, the board reviews the scope and results of the audit with the independent accountants, reviews with management and the independent accountants our annual operating results, considers the adequacy of our internal accounting procedures and considers other auditing and accounting matters including fees to be paid to the independent auditor and the performance of the independent auditor.  At the present time,  our chief financial officer is considered to be our expert in financial and accounting matters.

The Audit and Compliance Committee meets to review and discuss our accounting practices and procedures with management and independent public accountants and to review our quarterly and annual financial statements. The Audit and Compliance Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of the quality and integrity of our accounting, auditing, and reporting practices. The Audit and Compliance Committee's primary duties include reviewing the scope and adequacy of our internal accounting and financial controls; reviewing the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm; approving the scope of our independent registered public accounting firm's audit activities; approving the fees of our independent registered public accounting firm; approving any non-audit related services; reviewing the audit results; reviewing the objectivity and effectiveness of our internal audit function; and reviewing our financial reporting activities and the application of accounting standards and principles. Prior to the formation of the Audit and Compliance Committee, the Board performed these functions.

 

The members of the Audit and Compliance Committee are Jay Moyes (Chairman), Ron Barhorst and John Sorrentino. Each member of the audit committee, in addition to being independent under the standards of NASDAQ, is independent under the standards of the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and regulations pertaining to listed company audit committees. The Board of Directors has determined that Jay Moyes is an "audit committee financial expert" in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

Nominating Committee

Our size and the size of our board, at this time, do not require a separate nominating committee.  This function is performed by the entire board of directors.  When evaluating director nominees, our directors consider the following factors:

- The appropriate size of our board of directors;

The Nominating Committee is responsible for overseeing the nomination of our directors. The Nominating Committee selects, evaluates, and recommends to the full Board of Directors qualified candidates for election to the Board of Directors. The members of the Nominating Committee are John Sorrentino (Chairman), Ron Barhorst and Jay Moyes. Prior to the formation of the Nominating Committee, the Board performed these functions.

 

The Board of Directors will consider recommendations by shareholders for director nominees if the names of those nominees and relevant biographical information are submitted in writing to our company's Secretary in the manner described for shareholder nominations below under the heading "Shareholder Proposals." The Nominating Committee identifies and evaluates nominees for our Board of Directors, including nominees recommended by shareholders, based on numerous factors it considers appropriate, some of which may include strength of character, mature judgment, career specialization, relevant technical skills, diversity, and the extent to which the nominee would fill a present need on our Board of Directors. Although the Nominating Committee does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees, the Nominating Committee strives to nominate directors with a variety of complementary skills so that, as a group, the Board will possess the appropriate talent, skills and expertise to oversee the Company's business. All director nominations, whether submitted by a shareholder, the Nominating Committee, or the Board of Directors, will be evaluated in the same manner.



 

- Our needs with respect to the particular talents and experience of our directors;

 

- The knowledge, skills and experience of nominees, including experience in finance, administration or public service, in light of prevailing business conditions and the knowledge, skills and experience already possessed by other members of the board;

 

- Experience in political affairs;

 

- Experience with accounting rules and practices; and

 

- The desire to balance the benefit of continuity with the periodic injection of the fresh perspective provided by new board members.

 


Our goal is to assemble a board that brings together a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high quality business and professional experience.  In doing so, the board will also consider candidates with appropriate non-business backgrounds.

Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although the board may also consider such other factors as it may deem in our best interests as well as in the best interests of our stockholders.  In addition, the board identifies nominees by first evaluating the current members of the board willing to continue in service.  Current members of the board with skills and experience that are relevant to our business and who are willing to continue in service are considered for re-nomination.  If any member of the board does not wish to continue in service or if the board decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election, the board then identifies the desired skills and experience of a new nominee in light of the criteria above.  Current members of the board are polled for suggestions as to individuals meeting the criteria described above.  The board may also engage in research to identify qualified individuals.  To date, we have not engaged third parties to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying potential nominees, although we reserve the right in the future to retain a third party search firm, if necessary.  The board does not typically consider stockholder nominees because it believes that its current nomination process is sufficient to identify directors who serve our best interests.

Finance Committee

Although we currently do not have a Finance Committee, we plan to form one and when one is established we do it will consist of a minimum of three members of the board of directors, the majority of whom shall meet the same independence and experience requirements of the Audit Committee and the applicable provisions of federal law and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder and the applicable rules of the OTC Market, the NASDAQ Stock Market, the New York Stock Exchange, or any other exchange where the shares of the Company may be listed or quoted for sale.  The members of the Finance Committee are to be recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the board of directors.

 

-47-




Compensation Committee

Although we currently do not have a Compensation Committee, we have adopted a charter which provides that when established it is to assist the board of directors in meeting its responsibilities with regard to oversight and determination of executive compensation and to review and make recommendations to the board of directors with respect to major compensation plans, policies and programs of the Company.  The Compensation Committee shall consist of not fewer than two members of the board of directors, with the exact number being determined by the board.  Members of the Compensation Committee shall be appointed from time to time to serve in such capacity by the Board.  Each member shall meet the independence and outside director requirements of applicable tax and securities laws and regulations and stock market rules.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing, reviewing, and approving our executive compensation and benefit programs and administers the Company's equity incentive plans for employees. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee may delegate authority to subcommittees of the Compensation Committee or to executive officers of the Company, particularly the President and CEO with respect to compensation determinations for persons who are not executive officers of the Company. The members of the Compensation Committee are Ron Barhorst (Chairman), Jay Moyes and John Sorrentino. Prior to the formation of the Compensation Committee, the Board performed these functions.


-53-








Our compensation objectives for executive officers are as follows:

 

     

 

to attract and retain highly qualified individuals capable of making significant contributions to the long-term success of our company;

 

     

 

to use incentive compensation to reinforce strategic performance objectives;

 

     

 

to align the interest of our executives with the interests of our shareholders such that the risks and rewards of strategic decisions are shared; and

 

     

 

to reflect the value of each officer's position in the marketplace and within our company.

  

Policies and Practices Related to our Compensation Program. We strive to create an overall compensation package for each executive officer that satisfies the aforementioned objectives, recognizing that certain elements of compensation are better suited to reflect different compensation objectives. For example, as base salaries are the only element of compensation that are fixed in amount in advance of the year in which the compensation will be earned, the Compensation Committee believes that it is most appropriate to determine base salaries with a focus on the market practices for similarly situated officers at comparable companies as adjusted to reflect the individual officer's performance during the preceding year. In contrast, cash bonuses and long-term incentives are better able to reflect our company's performance as measured by financial metrics and are well-suited to motivate officers to achieve specific performance goals that the Compensation Committee has determined are in the best interests of our company. Equity grants are also well-suited to drive long-term performance and align management's interests with those of shareholders. The Compensation Committee believes that as an officer's responsibility increases, so does his or her ability to influence the performance of our Company and accordingly, the proportion of his or her compensation that consists of his or her salary and cash bonus should decrease while the proportion of equity incentives to total compensation should increase.

 

Comparable Companies. In making compensation decisions, including assessing the competitiveness of the total compensation structure for each named executive officer, the Compensation Committee will consider compensation survey data from companies that the Compensation Committee has selected as comparable in terms of industry, size and location. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the companies that are included as comparable companies and makes revisions to the group as appropriate. The Compensation Committee also reviews executive compensation information for several Utah based publicly-traded companies having revenues similar to those of the Company. The Compensation Committee will review this compensation data to ensure the Company's compensation of our executives is reasonable.

  

Equity Grant Practices. The Compensation Committee recognizes the importance of equity ownership in the alignment of shareholder and management interests. The exercise price of each stock option awarded to our executive officers under our incentive compensation programs is equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant, which is the date when the Compensation Committee acts to approve equity awards for senior executives. Performance-based equity awards are also granted to our named executive officers at this time.


-54-








The Compensation Committee will establish the criteria, and direct the implementation, of all compensation program elements for the executive officers. Generally, the base salary for each named executive officer will be set at the beginning of each fiscal year by our Board after review of the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will consider the Chief Executive Officer's appraisal of other executive officers' general performance and looks especially to performance against predetermined goals before making its recommendation to the Board. The Compensation Committee may authorize the Chief Executive Officer to recruit executive officers and offer initial base salaries. The Chief Executive Officer may make recommendations for the Compensation Committee's approval for stock option grants and compensation related to achievement of non-quantitative goals under non-equity based incentive plans for other executive officers. The Compensation Committee may employ compensation consultants.

Conflicts of Interest

With respect to transactions involving real or apparent conflicts of interest, we have adopted written policies and procedures, which are contained in our Corporate Governance Principles, and which require that:

- The - The fact of the relationship or interest giving rise to the potential conflict be disclosed or known to the directors who authorize or approve the transaction prior to such authorization or approval;

 

 

- The - The transaction be approved by a majority of our disinterested directors; and

 

 

- The - The transaction be fair and reasonable to us at the time it is authorized or approved by our directors.

 

Code of Ethics for Senior Executive Officers and Senior Financial Officers

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Executive Officers and Senior Financial Officers that applies to our president, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial officer, and all financial officers, including the principal accounting officer.  The code provides as follows:

- Each oficer officer is responsible for full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in all periodic reports and financial disclosures required to be filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission or disclosed to our stockholders and/or the public.

- Each officer shall immediately bring to the attention of the audit committee, or disclosure compliance officer, any material information of which the officer becomes aware that affects the disclosures made by us in our public filings and assist the audit committee or disclosure compliance officer in fulfilling its responsibilities for full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in all periodic reports required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

- Each officer shall promptly notify our general counsel, if any, or the president or chief executive officer as well as the audit committee of any information he may have concerning any violation of our Code of Business Conduct or our Code of Ethics, including any actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships, involving any management or other employees who have a significant role in our financial reporting, disclosures or internal controls.


- Each officer shall immediately bring to the attention of our general counsel, if any, the president or the chief executive officer and the audit committee any information he may have concerning evidence of a material violation of the securities or other laws, rules or regulations applicable to us and the operation of our business, by us or any of our agents.

- Any waiver of this Code of Ethics for any officer must be approved, if at all, in advance by a majority of the independent directors serving on our board of directors.  Any such waivers granted will be publicly disclosed in accordance with applicable rules, regulations and listing standards.


-4855-








Code of Business Conduct

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct, which applies to the Company and all of our subsidiaries, whereby we expect each employee to use sound judgment to help us maintain appropriate compliance procedures and to carry out our business in compliance with laws and high ethical standards.  Each of our employees is expected to read our Code of Business Conduct and demonstrate personal commitment to the standards set forth in our Code of Business Conduct.  Our officers and other supervising employees are expected to be leaders in demonstrating this personal commitment to the standards outlined in our Code of Business Conduct and recognizing indications of illegal or improper conduct.  All employees are expected to report appropriately any indications of illegal or improper conduct.  An employee who does not comply with the standards set forth in our Code of Business Conduct may be subject to discipline in light of the nature of the violation, including termination of employment.

We will provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of our Corporate Governance Principles, our amended Code of Ethics for Senior Executive Officers and Senior Financial Officers, and our Code of Business Conduct.  In addition, we intend to post on our website all disclosures that are required by law concerning any amendments to our Corporate Governance Principles, our amended Code of Ethics for Senior Executive Officers and Senior Financial Officers, and our Code of Business Conduct.

Board of Directors Meetings

During the year ended December 31, 2017, our board of directors held two (2) formal meetings and no meetings were held where board actions were taken by written consent. All of the Company's directors attended 100% of our meetings in 2017.

 

Communication with Directors

Stockholders and other interested parties may contact any of our directors by writing to them at Predictive Technology Group, Inc., 2749 2735 Parleys Way, Suite 101205, Salt Lake City, Utah 84019, Attention: Corporate Secretary, telephone 801-820-0811, or email at www.predtechgroup.com.

ITEM 6.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION .

 

Overview of Compensation Program

 

Currently, the Board of Directors fulfills the functions of the Compensation Committee. We plan to form a Compensation Committee in the near future. At present, the Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and implementing our compensation philosophy, as detailed below. The Board reviews and approves all of our compensation policies, including executive officer salaries, bonuses and equity incentive compensation. The Board has designed our executive compensation programs with the goal of paying total compensation to the executive officers that is fair, reasonable, competitive, and includes incentives that are designed to appropriately drive corporate performance.

 

The Board reviews and approves the annual compensation for our executive officers. The Board may retain the services of an independent compensation consultant or research firm with respect to compensation of all named executive officers. The Board did not retain a consultant for any of the years from 2017 to 2018. In addition, the Board considers recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer with respect to other executive officers.

 

Overview of Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

 

Our "pay-for-performance" philosophy is among the fundamental tenets of our executive compensation program. We have adopted an approach to compensation comprised of a mix of short-term and long-term components that are designed to provide proper incentives and to reward our executive officers.

 


-4956-



Our compensation objectives for executive officers are as follows:

   

 

 

-

to attract and retain highly qualified individuals capable of making significant contributions to the long-term success of our company;

 

 

-

to use incentive compensation to reinforce strategic performance objectives;

 

 

-

to align the interest of our executives with the interests of our stockholders such that the risks and rewards of strategic decisions are shared; and

 

 

-

to reflect the value of each officer's position in the marketplace and within our company.

 

 

Compensation Policies and Procedures

 

Currently, the Board Our Compensation Committee is responsible for administering our compensation practices. We plan to appoint a The members of our Compensation Committee consisting consist entirely of directors who are "outside directors" for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, and non-employee directors for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act.

 

The Board holds Compensation Committee will hold meetings as necessary throughout the year.

 

Within the context of the overall objectives of our executive compensation philosophy, the Board determines Compensation Committee will determine the specific types and amounts of compensation to be paid to each of our named executive officers based on a number of factors including:

     

 

 

 

 

-

the roles and responsibilities of our executives;

 

-

the number of executives being compensated;

 

-

the individual experience and skills of, and expected contributions from, our executives;

 

-

special accomplishments;

 

-

compensation levels of executive officers at peer companies; and

 

-

our executives' historical compensation at the Company.

 

The Board strives Compensation Committee will strive to create an overall compensation package for each executive officer that satisfies the aforementioned objectives, recognizing that certain elements of compensation are better suited to reflect different compensation objectives. For example, as base salaries are the only element of compensation that are fixed in amount in advance of the year in which the compensation will be earned, the Board Compensation Committee believes that it is most appropriate to determine salaries with a focus on the market practices for similarly situated officers at comparable companies as adjusted to reflect the individual officer's performance. The Board strives Compensation Committee will strive to make such comparisons at least once in every two years and fix salaries based on such comparison, and the Board did so in 2018. In the years when such comparison is not made, salaries are adjusted from the previous year level based on the Board's Compensation Committee's collective knowledge of the industry, region and position as well as by applying their professional judgement. In contrast, cash bonuses and long-term incentives are better able to reflect our company's performance as measured by financial metrics and are well-suited to motivate officers to achieve specific performance goals that the Compensation Committee has determined are in the best interests of our company. Equity grants are also well-suited to drive long-term performance and align management's interests with those of shareholders. The Board Compensation Committee believes that as an officer's responsibility increases, so does his or her ability to influence the performance of our company and accordingly, the proportion of his or her compensation that consists of his or her salary and cash bonus should decrease while the proportion of equity incentives to total compensation should increase.

 


-50-57-








In making compensation decisions, including assessing the competitiveness of the total compensation structure for each named executive officer, the Boards Compensation Committee may consider compensation data from companies that the Board Compensation Committee may select as comparable in terms of industry, size and location, which it did in 2018. The Board Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, review surveys and relevant articles on executive compensation practices, and may receive reports on chief executive officer pay strategies and trends for publicly traded small cap companies for that purpose. The Board retains complete discretion with respect to the types and amounts of compensation awards each year.

 

The Board Compensation Committee establishes the criteria, and directs the implementation, of all compensation program elements for the executive officers. Generally, the salary for each named executive officer is set or reevaluated at some time during each fiscal year by the Board. The Board Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee considers the Chief Executive Officer's appraisal of other executive officers' general performance.

    

Elements of Compensation

 

The compensation of our named executive officers consists primarily of four components:

 

     

 

-

salary;

 

-

cash bonuses;

 

-

stock option based incentives; and

 

-

other benefits

 

In general, total compensation is geared to be sufficient to attract and retain excellent talent. In determining the adjustments to the compensation of our executive officers for the year ended June 30, 2018, we annually take into account the performance of each executive officer, their contributions toward the Company's success, and the Company's growth and stage of development.

 

We use a mix of short-term compensation (base salaries and potential cash incentive bonuses) and long-term compensation (equity incentive compensation) to provide a total compensation structure that is designed to achieve our pay-for-performance philosophy and our compensation objectives. We discuss each of the principal elements of our executive compensation in detail below.

 

Salary

 

In general, the salaries are designed to provide a consistent base of income and to attract the appropriate level of talent. The Board strives Compensation Committee will strive to set salaries that are in line with the salaries for executives serving in similar competitive positions in the market and generally around the median or greater level of salaries for executives serving in similar comparable positions. The Board undertook an assessment of any market data in 2018. Salaries were adjusted after such review.

 

The salaries of our executive officers are reviewed annually. We may also increase the salary of an executive officer at other times if a change in the scope of the officer's responsibilities or for any other reason that the Board Compensation Committee feels appropriate to achieve the objectives outlined here. The salaries also reflect the initial base salaries that were negotiated and annual adjustments made taking into account several factors including comparable positions in the market, contributions made by the executive, role and responsibilities of the executive and past performance.

-51
-58-

Cash Bonus

 



Incentive cash bonuses are designed to reward near-term operating performance and the achievement of milestones critical to our success in both the near and the long-term. Consistent with our emphasis on pay-for-performance, we have adopted an executive incentive bonus program. Executive officers will have an opportunity to earn bonuses based on the attainment of Company performance goals and a subjective analysis of individual performance that contributes to the attainment of those goals. The target bonuses reinforce three of our compensation goals - namely, to motivate our executives toward even higher achievement and business results, to tie our executives' goals and interests to ours and our stockholders' and to enable us to attract and retain highly qualified individuals.

 

Equity Incentive Compensation

 

We may grant equity incentive awards in the form of stock options to align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. Our decisions regarding the amount and type of equity incentive compensation and relative weighting of these awards among total executive compensation is based on several factors including contributions made by the executive, the role and responsibilities of the executive, past performance of the executive, cumulative equity awards made to an officer, current stock prices, recent history of profitability of the equity awards, and current philosophy of the Board with respect to the impact of equity awards on common stock dilution.

 

Initial awards to new officers are largely based on the negotiations the Chief Executive Officer had at the time of recruiting. Typically, the Chief Executive Officer negotiates and makes an offer of employment subject to approval of the BoardCompensation Committee.

 

We have typically made grants of equity incentive awards to our executive officers once a year. All such grants are reviewed and approved by the BoardCompensation Committee.

 

The date of grant and the exercise price of the awards are established on the date of final approval by the Board Compensation Committee in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 718, "Compensation - Stock Compensation." Exercise price is typically the closing market price of a share of our common stock on the date of the grant or in cases where grant is made to take effect on a subsequent future date, such future date. We do not have any program, plan or practice of setting the exercise price at a price less than fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. We do not have any program, plan or obligation that requires us to grant equity compensation on specified dates to our named executive officers.

 

Stock option awards provide our executive officers with the right to purchase shares of our common stock at a fixed exercise price typically for a period of up to ten years, subject to continued employment with our Company. In general, we provide our executives with service-based stock options that have gradual vesting schedules. These stock options are earned on the basis of continued service with the Company company and generally vest over three years with one-fourth of the options vesting on the date of grant and the remaining options vesting equally in three annual installments following the first vesting date.

 

We have granted stock options as incentive stock options in accordance with Section 422 of the Code, subject to the volume limitations contained in the Code, as well as non-qualified stock options. Generally, for stock options that do not qualify as incentive stock options, we are entitled to a tax deduction in the year in which the stock options are exercised equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value, at the time of exercise, of the stock for which the stock option was exercised. The holders of the non-qualified stock options are generally taxed on this same amount in the year of exercise. For stock options that qualify as incentive stock options, we do not receive a tax deduction, and the holder of the stock option may receive more favorable tax treatment than he or she would for a non-qualified stock option unless the holder makes a disqualifying disposition, generally by failing to hold the stock for the period required by the Code. Historically, we have primarily granted incentive stock options to provide these potential tax benefits to our executives and because of the limited expected benefits to our company of the potential tax deductions as a result of our historical net losses.

 

In 2015, we adopted, as approved by our stockholders, the 2015 Stock Option Plan that affords more flexibility to our Compensation Committee by allowing grants of a wide variety of equity awards to our key employees, directors



and consultants, including non-qualified stock options, shares of restricted stock and other awards that are valued by reference to the fair market value of our common stock. This plan is designed to assist us in attracting, retaining, motivating and rewarding key employees, directors and consultants and providing long-term value for our stockholders by closely aligning the interests of these individuals with those of our stockholders.

-52
-59-

Other Compensation

 

The Board Compensation Committee retains the discretion to offer other compensation to executive officers taking into account special circumstances. In 2018, no such compensation was paid.

 

All of our executive officers are eligible for benefits offered to employees generally, including life, health, disability and dental insurance and participation in our 401(k) plan. We intend to continue to maintain our current benefits for our executive officers. The Board in its discretion may revise, amend or add to the executive officers' benefits and perquisites if it deems it advisable. We do not believe it is necessary for the attraction or retention of executive talent to provide executive officers with a substantial amount of compensation in the form of perquisites. In 2018, no such perquisites were provided.

 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

 

Employment Agreements. As of the year ended June 30, 2018, our named executive officers had We have employment agreements with all of our named executive officers. Upon termination of an employment agreement, severance in an amount equal to an employee's base salary may be owed for a period of one to two years following termination.

  

Accounting and Tax Considerations

 

The Company uses judgment in determining the fair value of the options awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model with assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the risk-free interest rate of the awards, the expected life of the awards, the expected volatility over the term of the awards, and the expected dividends of the awards. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of share-based payments granted under the guidelines of ASC Topic 718. Black-Scholes option pricing model requires certain estimates, including an expected forfeiture rate and expected term of options granted. We also make decisions regarding the method of calculating expected volatilities and the risk-free interest rate used in the option-pricing model. The resulting calculated fair value of stock options is recognized as compensation expense over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. When there are changes to the assumptions used in the option-pricing model, including fluctuations in the market price of our common stock, there will be variations in the calculated fair value of our future stock option awards, which results in variation in the compensation cost recognized.

 

We generally intend for our executive compensation program to comply with Section 162(m) of the Code, as well as Code Section 409A. The Board intends for all compensation paid to the named executive officers (other than stock

option awards) to be tax deductible to us pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code. Under Section 162(m) of the Code, compensation paid to the named executive officers in excess of $1,000,000 cannot be deducted by us for federal income tax purposes, unless such amounts satisfy the performance-based exception to the deduction disallowance.  We have no executives which have been paid compensation in excess of $1,000,000.

 

Section 409A of the Code addresses certain non-qualified deferred compensation benefits payable to our executives and provides that if such benefits do not comply with Section 409A, they will be taxable in the first year they are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. In such case, our executives would be subject to regular federal income tax, interest and an additional federal income tax of 20% of the benefit includible in income. We have generally designed our executive compensation plans and agreements in a manner that complies with Section 409A.

 



We have granted stock options as incentive stock options in accordance with Section 422 of the Code subject to the volume limitations contained in the Code. Generally, the exercise of an incentive stock option does not trigger any recognition of income or gain to the holder. If the stock is held until at least one year after the date of exercise (or two years from the date the option is granted, whichever is later), all of the gain on the sale of the stock, when recognized for income tax purposes will be capital gain, rather than ordinary income to the recipient. Consequently, we do not receive a tax deduction. For stock options that do not qualify as incentive stock options, we are entitled to a tax deduction in the year in which the stock options are exercised equal to the spread between the exercise price and the fair market value of the stock for which the stock option was exercised. The holders of the non-qualified stock options are generally taxed on this same amount in the year of exercise.

 


-5360-

SUMMARY DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The following table sets forth the compensation paid or earned by each named executive officer for the years ended June 30, 2018.

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

                   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name and
Principal Position

Year

Salary

 ($)

Bonus

 ($)

Stock Awards

 ($)

Option Awards

 ($)(5)

Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Compensation

 ($)

Nonqualified

deferred

compensation

earnings

($)

All

Other Compensation 

($)(6)

Total

 ($)

 

Bradley C. Robinson (1)

 

2018

 

300,000

 

25,000

 

 -0-

 

 -0-

 

-0-

 

-0-

 

-0-

 

325,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Simon Brewer (2)

2018

62,500

-0-

-0-

50,434

-0-

-0-

-0-

112,934

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eric Olson (3)

2018

76,667

-0-

-0-

279,960-0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

356,62776,667

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Dey, Ph.D (4)

2018

-0-

-0-

  -0-

589,372

-0-

-0-

-0-

589,372

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Mr. Robinson is our Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director

(2) Mr. Simon Brewer is our Chief Financial Officer  

(3) Eric Oon Olson is our Executive Vice-president

(4) Michael Dey, PhD is our Chief Executive Officer of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Predictive Therapeutics, Inc.

(5) The amounts in the "Option Awards" column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of vested awards of stock options vested pursuant to our long-term incentive plans during the periods reported above, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. The assumptions made in the valuation of our vested option awards and the material terms of option awards are disclosed in Note 12 to our June 30, 2018 financial statements.

(6) Does not include perquisites and other personal benefits, or property, unless the aggregate amount of such compensation is more than $10,000.


-5461-








OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

 

The following table provides information on the holdings of stock options by the named executive officers as of June 30, 2018.

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable

 

Option Exercise Price ($)

 

Option Expiration Date

Bradley C. Robinson

-0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

Simon Brewer

50,000

250,000

$.80

December 19,2027

Paul Evans

250,000

750,000

$.78

December 20, 2027

Eric Olson

-0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

Michael Dey, Ph.D.

687,500

62,500

$.50

August 1, 2027

 

Executive Compensation Report

 

The Board has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and discussed that Analysis with management. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Board included the Analysis in this Registration Statement on Form 10 for the year ended June 30, 2018. This report is provided by the following directors, who comprise all of the members of the Board.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

As of December 1, 2018, we do not have a Compensation Committee. The Board of Directors performs the functions of the Compensation Committee. The Board consists of John Sorrentino (Chairman), Bradley C. Robinson, Michael Dey and Merle Ferguson. With the exception of Mr. Robinson, who is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mr. Dey, who is the CEO of Predictive Therapeutics, LLC and a director, no officers participated in the deliberations of the Board concerning executive compensation.

 

The members of the Compensation Committee are Ron Barhorst (Chairman), Jay Moyes and John Sorrentino.

 

With the exception of Mr. Robinson and Mr. Dey, no member of the Board No member of the Compensation Committee was at any time in 2018 or at any other time was an officer or employee of the Company , and no member had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure as a related-person transaction in the section "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions." No executive officer of the Company has served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has or has had one or more executive officers who served as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee at any time in 2018.


-62-

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

We did not pay any compensation to Mr. Ferguson, our only non-employee director, for the year ended June 30, 2018. Mr. Robinson and Mr. Dey did not receive additional compensation for their service as a directorsdirector. In fiscal 2019 we plan to compensate our non-executive directors with a cash payment of $2,500 for each in-person board meeting attended ($1,000 for telephonic participation) and options to acquire 250,000 shares of our common stock at a strike price equal to fair market value on the date of grant.

 

ITEM 7.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE .

 



In June 2017, Predictive entered into an Independent Sales Representation and Support Agreement (the "Sales Agreement") with Flagshipsailsrx, LLC ("Flagship"). Flagship is owned, in part, by Tim Lacy, the Company's former Executive Vice President and former President of the Company's Predictive Biotech, Inc. subsidiary. Under the terms of the Sales Agreement Flagship is acting acted as an independent sales management and sales representative. Flagship's duties include included marketing and selling Predictive products, creating and updating sales and marketing plans and budgets, staffing certain leadership, sales and marketing personnel, developing marketing materials, developing promotional and marketing materials, and assisting Predictive with other related projects as identified by Predictive. The term of the Sales Agreement ends ended on February 28, 2019. As compensation for services rendered, Predictive is obligated to pay Flagship cash fees totaling $994,458 for services rendered in calendar 2017, $1,196,136 for services rendered in calendar 2018 and $199,356 for services rendered in calendar 2019.  In addition, upon the achievement of certain sales milestone, Predictive is was required to issued issue to Flagship warrants exercisable for up to 12,000,000 shares of Predictive common stock at an exercise price of $.50 per share. Flagship has met all required milestones and Predictive issued to Flagship said warrants.

 


-55-




Except as otherwise indicated herein, there have been no other related party transactions, or any other transactions or relationships required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 8.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS .

On or about July 13, 2018, RTJ, LLC and two of its principals filed a lawsuit against Predictive Therapeutics LLC, Predictive Biotech, Inc., both subsidiaries of Predictive Technology Group, Inc., and Jack Turner, Jr., an employee of Predictive Biotech, Inc. The plaintiffs had acted in a distributor capacity. The relationship was terminated. Plaintiffs are alleging breach of contract, promissory estoppel, unjust enrichment, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, defamation, false light, and tortious interference. Based on the information available to us, we do not believe any of the RTJ proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position or liquidity. Further, we deny the allegations in the complaint, have not discovered any evidence of wrongdoing with respect to the allegations and will vigorously defend against these allegations. As this claim is neither probable nor estimable, we expect no material financial impact as a result of this Action.  

On or about May 1, 2019, Surgenex, LLC and one of its principals filed a lawsuit against Predictive Therapeutics LLC, Predictive Biotech, Inc., both subsidiaries of Predictive Technology Group, Inc., and Doug Schmid, an employee of Predictive Biotech, Inc. In 2014 Surgenex contracted with Utah Cords Bank, Inc., a former employer of Doug Schmid, to assist Surgenex in the doing work relating to allograft tissue. Schmid was later hired by Predictive Biotech, Inc. In connection with Schmid's employment with Predictive Biotech, Surgenex has filed a lawsuit alleging unjust enrichment, conspiracy, conversion, tortious interference with contractual and business relations, violations of trade secrets act, and other claims. Based on the information available to us, we do not believe the Surgenex proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position or liquidity. Further, we deny the allegations in the complaint, have not discovered any evidence of wrongdoing with respect to the allegations and will vigorously defend against these allegations.

As of March 31, 2019, the Company did not record a liability related to these matters as it determined that an unfavorable resolution is either not currently probable or that an amount or relevant range is not reasonably estimable. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable and it is possible that losses may occur. Any unfavorable resolution of any of these matters could materially affect the Company's consolidated financial position, cash flows, or results of operations. All legal costs associated with litigation are expensed as incurred.

ITEM 9.  MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS   

 

(a)  Market Information

 

Our common stock is traded on the OTC Markets under the symbol PRED.  

 


-63-

The high and low common stock sales prices per share were as follows:

                                         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First

Quarter

 

 

Second

Quarter

 

 

Third

Quarter

 

 

Fourth

Quarter

 

 

Full Year

 

2018 2019 (through December 1May 20, 2018 2019)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High

 

$

1.23

 

 

$

2.09

 

 

$

2.995

 

 

$

4.36

 

 

$

4.36

 

Low

 

 

0.84

 

 

 

0.79

 

 

 

0.897

 

 

 

2.01

 

 

 

0.79

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High

 

$

3.65

 

 

$

1.28

 

 

$

2.32

 

 

$

1.91

 

 

$

3.65

 

Low

 

 $

1.18

 

 

 $

0.88

 

 

 $

0.86

 

 

 $

0.840.82

 

 

 $

0.840.82

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





High

 

$

1.82

 

 

$

1.12

 

 

$

1.18

 

 

$

1.58

 

 

$

1.82

 

Low

 

 

0.51

 

 

 

0.24

 

 

 

0.70

 

 

 

0.78

 

 

 

0.24

 

 

The 2015 Stock Option Plan authorized the issuance of up to fifteen percent of the total outstanding shares. As of December 1May 20, 2018 2019, options exercisable for 5,783,500 29,280,500 shares had been granted under the Plan. In addition, the Company has outstanding warrants exercisable for 59,018,520 64,018,520 shares of common stock at strike prices of between $.50 and $.92 per share. We have granted piggy-back registration rights, subject to certain restrictions, for 14,000,000 shares of common stock that will be issued upon exercise of outstanding warrants.   


-56-




Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans  

 

We have the following shares authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plan Category

Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

Weighted-average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column a)

 

(a)

(b)

(c)

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

69,802,02029,280,500

$0.651.65

(1)

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

0

0

0

 

 

 

 

(1) Fifteen percent of the total outstanding shares. As of December 1May 20, 2018 2019, there were 239,046,403 272,535,397 shares outstanding which results in: (i) options exercisable for 5,783,500 29,280,500 shares of common stock being authorized under the Plan and (ii) options exercisable for 30,073,460 11,994,310 shares of common stock remaining available for issuance as of such date.

 


-64-








(b)  Holders: as of December 1May 20, 2018 2019, there are 280 310 shareholders of record and they hold approximately 239,046,403 272,535,397 shares of the Company's common stock.  Each broker dealer or a clearing corporation that holds shares for customers is counted as a single shareholder of record.

 

(c)  Dividends have not been declared or paid on the Company's equity securities. .

  

ITEM 10.  RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES .

 

During the past three years the Company issued (or is obligated to issue) the following shares:

 

1)Warrants exercisable for 2,400,000 shares of common stock were issued to Flagshipsailsrx, LLC ("Flagship"), an accredited investor, in March 2018 (the "2018 Warrants"). The warrants were issued to Flagship in return for its services as manager of the Company's sales team, distributors and marketing efforts. In February 2017, the Company agreed to issue the 2018 Warrants when annualized sales, computed on a monthly basis, reached $20,000,000. This milestone was achieved in March 2018. In February 2017, the Company issued to Flagship warrants exercisable for 4,800,000 shares of common stock was part of the original consideration to retain Flagship to manage the Company's sales, distribution and marketing efforts. In August 2017, the Company issued to Flagship warrants exercisable for 4,800,000 shares of common stock as a bonus that was agreed when annualized sales, computed on a monthly basis, reached $10,000,000. All of the above referenced warrants are exercisable at $.50 per share and expire between June, 2022 and August, 2022. There are no additional milestones that will require the issuance of additional securities to Flagship under existing arrangements.



-57-




2) Warrants exercisable for 300,000 shares of common stock were issued to an accredited consultant for consulting services relating to the Company's existing and proposed laboratory facilities. The warrants were issued in October August 2018. The warrants are exercisable at $.94 per share and expire on September 1, 2022.

3) Warrants exercisable for 14,000,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of common stock were issued to Juneau Bioscience, LLC in December, 2017 for consideration of amending the license agreements between Juneau and the Company to reduce the royalty rate under and expand the scope of the licenses to include the entire field of endometriosis and pelvic pain. The above referenced warrants are exercisable at $.80 per share and they expire on September 1, 2022. In December of 2018 the Company and Juneau agreed to renegotiate the price paid for the license. The warrants issued initially for this license agreement were cancelled, and a new round of warrants was issued with an increased exercise price of $0.90 per share, resulting in a decrease in the value assigned to the license agreement of $4,449,211. There was an associated adjustment to amortization expense.

4) In August, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to issue warrants exercisable for 16,500,000 shares of common stock. These warrants were issued to acquire certain assets of Taueret Laboratories, LLC.  The warrants are exercisable at $.92 per share and expire on September 1, 2022.

5) In August, 2018, the Company entered in into Consulting Agreement for various business development, marketing and consulting services and for those services the Company granted warrants exercisable for 5,250,000 shares of common stock. Warrants to acquire 250,000 shares vested upon issuance and the remainder of the warrants vest over a three-year period subject to accelerated vesting upon the happening of certain events. The warrants expire on the earlier of (i) the five-year anniversary of the date of issuance or (ii) the date the Consulting Agreement is terminated.

6) From October, 2017 to present, options were granted to employees that are exercisable for up to 4,988,500 29,280,500 shares of common stock. The options are exercisable at prices of between $.50 and $1.23 2.19 per share.


-65-








7) In November, 2015, 12,280,242 shares of restricted common stock were issued to accredited investors in connection with Share Exchange Agreements pursuant to which the Company acquired membership interests in Juneau Biosciences, LLC.

8) In March, 2016, 9,500,000 shares of restricted common stock were issued to accredited investors in a connection with Share Exchange Agreements pursuant to which the Company acquired Renovo Biotech, Inc (now Predictive Biotech, Inc.)

9) In August, 2016, 5,740,760 shares of restricted common stock were issued in connection with the acquisition of certain debt obligations of Juneau Biosciences, LLC.

10) In August, 2016, 550,000 shares of restricted common stock were issued in connection with the acquisition of intellectual property from accredited investors.

11) From August, 2017 to December 131,  2018, 1,802,917 1,602,917 shares of restricted common stock were issued in connection with management advisory services performed for the benefit of the Company.

12) In December, 2017, 5,822,206 shares of restricted common stock were issued to accredited investors in connection with the acquisition of a strategic partner.

13) From January, 2016 to December, 2017, 16,288,520 shares of restricted common stock together with warrants exercisable for 15,948,520 shares of common stock were sold to accredited investors at a price of $.50 per unit. The warrants are exercisable through August 1, 2021.

14) In May, 2018, 727,917 shares of restricted common stock were issued as payment for services in the development of protocols for the use of HCT/P's in specified medical procedures.

15)In August, 2018, 50,000 shares of restricted common stock were issued to a supplier to secure raw materials for the HCT/P segment of business.

16) In August, 2018, 15,500,000 shares of restricted stock were issued to accredited investors in a connection with Securities Purchase Agreement to acquire the assets of Inception DX, which included a CLIA laboratory in addition to cash, protocols, equipment and other assets.

17) In December, 2018, 10,000,000 shares of restricted stock were issued to accredited investors in a connection with the Company's acquisition of Regenerative Medical Technologies, Inc.  

18) In March 2019, 552,995 shares of our common stock were issued to the members of Taueret Laboratories, LLC in connection with the Company's acquisition of the laboratory.

19) In March 2019, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for business development services. In consideration for these services, the Company granted options to the consultant exercisable for 3,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock with a strike price equal to the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Options to acquire 1,000,000 shares vested upon issuance, and 750,000 vest upon the Company's listing on a major stock exchange. The remaining 1,750,000 options vest in five equal quarterly tranches of 350,000 options starting on September 1, 2019.  The warrants expire five years from the date of issuance.


-5866-

All securities issued by us in the transactions noted above are deemed "restricted securities" within the meaning of that term as defined in Rule 144 of the Securities Act and have been issued pursuant to the "private placement" exemption under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Such transactions did not involve a public offering of securities, no underwriter was involved with the transactions, and no commissions were paid. All purchasers in the



private placement had access to information on the Company necessary to make an informed investment decision. We have been informed that all purchasers are able to bear the economic risk of their investment and are aware that the securities were not registered under the Securities Act and cannot be re-offered or re-sold unless they are registered or are qualified for sale pursuant to an exemption from registration. The transfer agent and registrar of the Company were instructed to mark "stop transfer" on its ledger regarding these shares. 

Neither the Company nor any person acting on its behalf offered or sold the securities by means of any form of general solicitation or general advertising.

The securities were acquired for the purchasers own account and not with the view to, or for resale in connection with any distribution. A legend was placed on the certificates issued stating that the securities have not been registered under the Securities Act and cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without an effective registration or an exemption there from.

ITEM 11.  DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT'S SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED

Common Stock

We are authorized to issue 900,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $.001 per share. As of December 1May 20, 2018 2019, 239,046,403  272,535,397 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding. Each outstanding share of common stock is entitled to one vote, either in person or by proxy, on all matters that may be voted upon by the owners thereof at meetings of the stockholders.

Our shareholders have no pre-emptive rights to acquire additional shares of common stock. The common stock is not subject to redemption or any sinking fund provision, and it carries no subscription or conversion rights. In the event of our liquidation, the holders of the common stock will be entitled to share equally in the corporate assets after satisfaction of all liabilities.

The description contained in this section does not purport to be complete. Reference is made to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws which are available for inspection upon proper notice at our offices, as well as to the Nevada Revised Statutes for a more complete description covering the rights and liabilities of shareholders.

Holders of our common stock:

(i) have equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available therefore, if declared by our Board of Directors;

(ii) are entitled to share ratably in all our assets available for distribution to holders of common stock upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up;

(iii) do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights or redemption or sinking fund provisions; and

(iv) are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters on which stockholders may vote at all meetings of our stockholders.

The holders of shares of our common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than fifty percent (50%) of outstanding shares voting for the election of directors can elect all of our directors if they so choose and, in such event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any of our directors.


-67-

Preferred Stock

We may issue up to 10,000,000 shares of our preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, from time to time in one or more series. As of the date of this registration statement, no shares of preferred stock have been issued. Our Board of Directors, without further approval of our stockholders, is authorized to fix the dividend rights and terms, conversion rights, voting rights, redemption rights, liquidation preferences and other rights and restrictions relating to any series of preferred stock that may be issued in the future. Issuances of shares of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible financings, acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among other things,



adversely affect the voting power of the holders of our common stock and prior series of preferred stock then outstanding.


-59-




Dividends

We have no history of paying dividends, moreover, there is no assurance that we will pay dividends in the future.

Shares Eligible for Future Sale

Our shares are thinly traded on the OTC Market, and we cannot assure you that a significant public market for our common stock will be developed. Sales of common stock in the public market, or the possibility sales occurring, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock or our future ability to raise capital through an offering of equity securities.

As of December 1May 15, 2018 2019, we have 157,805,580 have158,542,192 outstanding shares of common stock that are "restricted" as that term is defined in the Securities Act. We have granted piggy-back registration rights, subject to certain restrictions, for 14,000,000 shares of common stock that will be issued upon exercise of outstanding warrants. Except as noted above, we have not entered into any other agreements to register any of our issued and outstanding shares, although such agreement may be entered into in the future, or such an agreement may be made part of the terms of a future combination transaction.

ITEM 12.  INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Our bylaws and articles of incorporation provide that our officers and directors are indemnified to the fullest extent provided by the Nevada Revised Statutes ("NRS").

Under the Nevada Revised Statutes, director immunity from liability to a company or its shareholders for monetary liabilities applies automatically unless it is specifically limited by a company's Articles of Incorporation. Our Articles of Incorporation do not specifically limit the directors' immunity. The NRS excepts from that immunity (a) a willful failure to deal fairly with the company or its shareholders in connection with a matter in which the director has a material conflict of interest; (b) a violation of criminal law, unless the director had reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was lawful or no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful; (c) a transaction from which the director derived an improper personal profit; and (d) willful misconduct.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Company pursuant to the foregoing, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.

The Company has purchased insurance for the directors and officers that may provide coverage for their acts as an officer or director of the Company. The Company has also entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors, which may also provide coverage for their acts as officers and directors.

ITEM 13.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

Financial statements and supplementary data required by this Form are included herein as a separate section of this Form 10, beginning on page F-1, and are incorporated in this Item 13 by reference.

ITEM 14.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES .

There have been no changes in accountants and there are no disagreements with the accountants on accounting and financial disclosures.

-60
-68-

 ITEM 15.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS .

 

(a) Index to Financial Statements



Financial statements on beginning on page F-1

(b) Index to Exhibits.


 

   

Exhibit No.

Identification of Exhibit

 

3.1

Articles of Amendment toArticles to Articles of Incorporation. (1)

3.2

Bylaws. (1)

4.1

Specimen Certificate of Common Stock (1)

10.1

Second Amended and Restated License Agreement by and between the Company and Juneau Biosciences, LLC. effective March 31, 2018. (1)

10.2

Second Amended and Restated Subscription Agreement by and between the Company and Juneau Biosciences, LLC, effective August 22, 2018. (1)

10.3

Intellectual Property Purchase and Services Agreement by and between the Company and Taueret Laboratories, L.L.C., Kenneth Ward and Rakesh Chettier, effective August 1, 2018. (1)

10.4

Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Company, Predictive Acquisitions, Inc., and Regenerative Medical Technologies, Inc., dated July 21, 2018. (1)

10.5

Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and the members of Inception DX, LLC, effective August 22, 2018 (1)

10.6

FLAGSHIPSAILSRX, LLC Sales Support Agreement, dated June 15, 2017 (1)

10.7

Amended License Agrement Agreement between Company and Juneau Biosciences, LLC, effective August 1, 2016. (1)

10.8

Lease between the Company and Eastland Regency, L.C., dated June 30, 2017 (1)

10.9

Lease between the Company and Paradigm Resources, LC, effective June 21, 2018 (1)

10.10

Amendment No. 1 to Lease between the Company and Paradigm Resources, LC, dated October 1, 2018 (1)

10.11

Amendment No. 2 to Lease between the Company and Paradigm Resources, LC, dated October 10, 2018 (1)

10.12

Form of Employment Agreement (1)

10.13

Employment Contract Bradley C. Robinson (Originally filed as Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10Q Period Ended September 30, 2018) (2)

10.14

Employment Contract Paul Evans (Originally filed as Exhibit 10.2 on Form 10Q Period Ended September 30, 2018) (2)

10.15

Employment Contract Simon Brewer (Originally filed as Exhibit 10.3 on Form 10Q Period Ended September 30, 2018) (2)

10.16

Employment Contract Eric Olson (Originally filed as Exhibit 10.4 on Form 10Q Period Ended September 30, 2018) (2)

10.17

Amendment No.1 to the Second Amended and Restated Subscription Agreement between Juneau Biosciences, LLC and Predictive Technology Group, Inc (Originally filed as Exhibit 10.5 on Form 10Q Period Ended September 30, 2018) (2)

10.18

First Amended and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement between Taueret Laboratories, LLC and Predictive Technology Group, Inc. (Originally Filed as Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed 03/ 22/2019 (4)

10.19

Employment Contract with Michael Herbert (5)

10.20

Securities Purchase Agreement between Predictive Technology Group, Inc and Taueret Laboratories, LLC (Orignially Filed as Exhibit 2.1 on Form 10 on 12/ 12 2018 and Form 10-Q on 02/14/2019) (1)(2)

10.21

First Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement between Predictive Technology Group, Inc and Taueret Laboratories, LLC (Orignially Filed as Exhibit 2.1 on Form 10 on 12/ 12 2018 and Form 10-Q on 02/14/2019) (1)(2)

17.1

Resignation Letter-Merle Ferguson (Originally Exhibit 17.1 on Form 8-K filed 03/19/2019 ) (3)




99.1

Press Release-Predictive Technology Group Names Senator Orrin G. Hatch and Ronald Barhorst to Its Board of Directors (Originally Exhibit 99.1 on Form 8-K filed 03/19/2019 ) (3)

99.2

Juneau Biosciences, LLC Independent Audit Opinion Letter for years ending December 31, 2017 and 2018 issued by BF Borgers, CPA, P.C. (5)

21.1

Subsidiaries of Registrant (1)

23.1

Auditor Consent- BF Borgers (6)

(1) Previously filed as Exhibit on Form 10 - December 12, 2018

(2) Previously filed as Exhibit on Form 10-Q period ending September 30, 2019- February 14, 2019

(3) Previously filed as Exhibit on Form 8-K filed- March 03, 2019

(4) Previously filed as Exhibit on Form 8-K filed- March 25, 2019

(5) Previously filed as Exhibit on Form 10/A filed- April 22, 2019

(6) Filed herewith

-69-


 

SIGNATURES


In accordance with Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this amended registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.


Date: December 6May 22, 2018 219

By: By:/s/ Bradley C. Robinson

    Bradley C. Robinson, Chief Executive Officer



-6170-


FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC

 

 

FINANCIAL REPORTS

AT

SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

MARCH 31, 2019

(Unaudited)




TABLE OF CONTENTS

     

 

 

 

 

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September as of March 31, 2019 and June 30, 2018  (Unaudited) and Jume 30, 2018    

F-2




 

 

 

 

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended   September 30, 2018 and 2017- Unaudited  and Comprehensive Loss for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

F-3

 

 

 

 

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended September 30nine months ended March 31,  2019 and 2018and 2017-Unaudited

F-4

 

 

 

 

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity as of March 31, 2019 and June 30, 2018

F-7

 

 

 

 

Unaudited Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

F-5-F-27F-7-F-28


F-1




 

PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2018

                       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MSeptember 30,arch 31, 2019

 

June 30, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018Unaudited

2018 Audited

Assets ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Unaudited 

 

 

Audited 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

 $1,056,780

1,826,420

 $

 $          1,206,139

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

       1,553,835

812,443

 

         719,068

 

 

Inventory

 

 

 

       3,383,654

3,682,658

 

      3,791,374

 

 

Other current assets

 

            97,752

1,233,469

 

           17,551

 

Total current assets

 

 

       6,092,021 

7,554,990

 

      5,734,132

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed assets, net of depreciation

1,918,234

7,107,638

 

         773,870

 

License agreements, net of amortization

20,448,953

15,067,404

 

    20,962,620

 

Patents, net of amortization

7,710,687

7,351,127

 

      7,761,187

 

Trade secrets, net of amortization

34,692,259

42,846,223

 

      8,096,311

Other intangible assets, net of amortization

 

411,000

 

-

 

Equity method investments

45,690,062

51,774,200

 

    45,564,84555,392,622

Goodwill

 

5,254,451

 

5,254,451

 

Other long-term assets

 

            24,500

12,069

 

           12,000

Total assets

 

 

 

 

 

$ 116,576,716

137,379,102

 $

 $ 88,904,964103,987,193

 

  LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





Liabilities and stockholder's equity

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ac

 

counts payable

 

 $2,495,670

2,738,267

 $

 $          1,322,149

 

Ac

 

crued liabilities

 

          707,518

1,555,710

 

      1,034,905

Deferred revenue

 

501,685

 

-

Capital lease obligation, current portion

 

2,114,491

 

-

 

Subscription payable

 

       3,444,947

4,950,000

 

      4,409,390

 

Total current liabilities

 

       6,648,135 

11,860,153

 

      6,766,444

 

Long-term subscription payable Capital lease obligation

     10,694,310

1,784,471

 

    10,965,610-

Long-term subscription payable

 

5,840,610

 

10,965,611

Deferred tax liabilities

 

5,533,619

 

4,917,323

 

Total liabilities

 

 

 

     17,342,445 

25,018,853

 

    17,732,05422,649,378

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SStockholder's tockholders' equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Co

 

mmon stock, par value $0.001, 238,846,403,272,530,397 and 247,496,403

       

 

  shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2019 and

and 224,496,093 shares issued and out-

       





 

  June 30, 2018; 900,000,000 shares authorized

 standing at September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2018;

272,530

 

 247,624

 

  Additional paid-in capital

 900,000,000 shares authorized

          238,846

146,137,139

 

         224,496108,049,300

138,175,710

 

  108,072,428

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

Co

 

mmon stock subscriptions receivable

        (700,000) 

-

 

     (1,025,000)

 

Ac

 

cumulated deficit

 

   (38,332,464)

(33,840,410)

 

   (35,978,862)(25,813,957)

 

Total controlling interest

 

     99,382,092

112,569,259

 

    71,293,06281,457,967

 

Non-controlling interest

 

        (147,821)

(209,010)

 

        (120,152)

 

Total stockholder's stockholders' equity

     99,234,271

112,360,249

 

    71,172,91081,337,815

Total liabilities and stockholder's stockholders' equity

$ 116,576,716

137,379,102

 $

 $ 88,904,964103,987,193  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements


F-2



 

PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND

COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the periods ending September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017

                     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 3 months ended,

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

September 30,

     

September 30,

             

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20172018  Three months ended March 31,

 

Nine months ended March 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unaudited 2019

 

 

Unaudited2018

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Revenuefrom operations (net)

 

$

 $    8,063,80011,295,618

 

 

$

 $   2,005,1714,232,650

 

$

30,046,456

 

 

$

9,472,404

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

       2,866,7344,773,332

 

 

 

899,0791,794,363

 

 

10,881,024

 

 

 

3,553,912

 

 

Gross profitfrom operations

 

 

       5,197,0666,522,286

 

 

 

      1,106,0922,438,287

 

 

19,165,432

 

 

 

5,918,492

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Sales and marketingexpense

 

 

       2,422,7182,888,309

 

 

 

         549,5494,321,441

 

 

8,726,902

 

 

 

10,040,226

 

 

     General and administrative

 

 

       2,563,4404,835,652

 

 

 

359,3941,360,304

 

 

10,380,413

 

 

 

4,700,683





 

 

     Research and product development

 

 

          605,3901,458,265

 

 

 

           12,500366,656

 

 

3,823,908

 

 

 

416,536

 

 

     Amortization and depreciation expense

 

 

       1,672,4302,374,006

 

 

 

         748,6531,148,262

 

 

6,075,090

 

 

 

3,386,626

 

 

 Total operating expenses

Total operating expense 

 

       7,263,97811,556,232

 

 

 

      1,670,0967,196,663

 

 

29,006,313

 

 

 

18,544,071

 

 

Loss from operations 

 

 

     (2,066,912) 

 

 

 

        (564,004) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      Operating loss

 

 

 

 

 

 (5,033,946)

 

 

 

 (4,758,376)

 

 

(9,840,881)

 

 

 

(12,625,579)

 

Other income (expense) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      Other income (loss), net

Interest income 

 

                 42381,988

 

 

 

           93,224(25,449)

 

 

(831,998)

 

 

 

178,085

 

 

 

Equity method investment gain / (loss) 

 

        (314,782) 

 

 

 

                   -    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Loss before income taxes

Other income (expense) 

 

                   -   (4,951,958)

 

 

 

                   -   (4,783,825)

 

 

(10,672,879)

 

 

 

(12,447,494)

 

 

Net income / (loss) 

 

 

 $  (2,381,271) 

 

 

 

 $     (470,780) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





     Benefit from income taxes

 

 

(1,215,312)

 

 

 

(1,579,463)

 

 

(2,541,290)

 

 

 

(4,905,699)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(3,736,646)

 

 

$

(3,204,362)

 

$

(8,131,589)

 

 

$

(7,541,795)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      Net loss non-controlling interest

Net loss non-controlling interest 

 

          (27,669)(27,735)

 

 

 

            (8,124)(10,946)

 

 

(88,858)

 

 

 

(32,837)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss controlling interest & comprehensive loss

 

$

 $  (2,353,602)(3,708,911)

 

 

$

 $     (462,656)(3,193,416)

 

$

(8,042,731)

 

 

$

(7,508,958)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss per Weighted average common shareshares

 

 

 272,029,651

 

 

 

 234,698,827

 

 

263,060,001

 

 

 

234,698,827

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and & diluted loss per share

 

 $

            (0.0110.01)

 

 

$

            (0.0020.01)

 

$

(0.03)

 

 

$

(0.03)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





 

Average common shares (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted

 

          223,254

 

         201,978

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


See accompanying notes


See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

F-3








PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  

PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Indirect Method)

For the 3 months ending September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017

           

 

 

 

 3 months ended,

 

   

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2017

2018 Nine months ended March 31,

 

 

 

Unaudited 2019

 

Unaudited2018

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss)

$

 $  (2,389,580)(8,131,589)

 

 $(462,656)

(7,541,795)

 

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss to net cash provided (used) toin operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Depreciation and amortization

net cash provided by operating activities: 

 6,075,090

 

 

3,386,626

 

 Share based compensation

Depreciation and amortization 

       1,671,4384,238,790

 

         748,653

8,369,120

 

 Deferred income taxes

Stock, options and/or warrants exchanged for services 

          528,344(2,541,290)

 

 -

(4,905,699)

 

 Losses on equity method investment

Accrued interest income 

                   -1,108,422

 

          (93,000)

22,647

 

 Gain on bargain purchase

Non cash compensation to employees 

170,104(272,757)

 

  -

-

 

 

Change in equity method investment

          314,782

 

  -

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable 

        (834,767)(80,331)

 

          (75,797)

(621,835)

 

 Inventory

Inventory 

          407,719977,556

 

        (428,962)

(852,084)

 

 Prepaid expenses

Prepaid expenses 

          (80,200)(88,542)

 

          (94,890)

110

 

 Other assets

Other assets 

 (24,500)(57,273)

 

  -

(183,335)

 

 Accounts Payable

Accounts payable 

       1,176,451808,725

 

         327,824

(56,129)

 

 Accrued liabilities

Accrued liabilities 

        (330,315)520,805

 

        (372,635)

(186,426)

Deferred Revenue

 

501,685

 

-





 

Net cash provided by (used in) by operating activities

 

          609,4773,059,291

 

        (451,463)

(2,568,800)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

   

 

 Purchases of property and equipment

Purchases of property and equipment 

     (1,226,507)(2,554,966)

 

        (142,779)

(384,234)

 

 Purchases of intellectual property

Capitalization of license agreement costs 

                   -(163,461)

 

     (1,955,472)

(2,200,984)

 

    Cash acquired from acquisitions, net

Common stock issued for acquisition 

     14,260,000885,674

 

  -

-

 

    Cash payments for subscription payable

Acquistion of minority interests 

        (440,000)(1,634,390)

 

 -

-

 

 Net cash used in investing activities

Acquisition of Incpetion Dx 

   (12,320,020)(3,467,143)

 

-

(2,585,218)

 

 

Capitalization of patent application costs 

        (140,675)

 

-

 

 

CNet cash provided (used) by investing ash flows from financing activities:

 

          132,798

 

     (2,098,251)

 

 

 Cash proceeds from stock subscriptions

 

 1,025,000

 

 

4,608,280

 

Cash flows from financing activitiesExercises of stock options

 

 3,133

 

 

-

 

 

Cash paid for subscription payable

     (1,216,634)

 

-

 

 

Common stock issued for services

  -

 

 -

 

 

Common stock and warrants issued for cash

          325,000

 

      2,695,000

 

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

 

        (891,634)1,028,133

 

      2,695,000

4,608,280

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

        (149,359)620,281

 

         145,286

(545,737)

 

Cash at and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

 $

 $    1,206,139

 

 $968,202

968,202





 

Cash at and cash equivalents at the end of the period

$

 $    1,056,7801,826,420

 

 $1,113,488

422,465

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash financing and investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Warrants issued for trade secrets

     15,160,385

 

  -   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements


F-4



 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

The following is a summary of supplemental cash flow activities:

 

       

 

Nine months ended March 31,

 

2019

 

2018

Common stock issued for license agreement

-

 

18,159,211

Minority interest acquired for conversion of notes

-

 

3,685,308

Acquisition of minority interests

-

 

8,577,918

Common stock and warrants issued for acquisitions

39,637,897

 

-

Revaluation of warrants issued for license agreement

(4,449,211)

 

-

 

See accompanying notes


F-5








UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

                       

 

Common stock

Additional

paid-in

capital

Commons

stock

subscriptions

Non-controlling

interests

Accumulated

Deficit

Total

Stockholders'

Equity

 

Shares

 Amount

BALANCES AT JUNE 30, 2018

247,624,069

$247,624

$108,049,301

$(1,025,000)

$(120,152)

$(25,813,957)

$81,337,815

 

Common stock issued for acquisitions

15,500,000

15,500

14,244,500

     

14,260,000

 

Common stock issued for services

50,000

50

43,450

     

43,500

 

Common stock cancelled

(1,200,000)

(1200)

-

     

(1,200)

 

Warrants issued for trade secrets

   

13,860,000

     

13,860,000

 

Cash received from common stock subscriptions

     

325,000

   

325,000

 

Warrants and options issued for services

   

906,948

     

906,948

 

Net loss

       

(27,669)

(2,004,382)

(2,032,051)

 

BALANCES AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

261,974,069

$261,974

$137,104,199

$(700,000)

$(147,821)

$(27,818,339)

$ 108,700,013

 

Revaluation of warrants issued for license agreement

   

(4,449,211)

     

(4,449,211)

 

Common stock issued for acquisition

10,000,000

10,000

9,190,000

     

9,200,000

 

Cash received from common stock subscriptions

     

700,000

   

700,000





 

Warrants and options issued for services

   

653,372

     

653,372

 

Net loss

       

(33,454)

(2,329,438)

(2,362,892)

 

BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2018

271,974,069

$271,974

$142,498,360

-

$(181,275)

$(30,147,777)

$112,441,282

 

Common stock issued for acquisition

552,995

553

1,016,958

     

1,017,511

 

Adoption of ASU 2018-07

   

(16,278)

   

16,278

-

 

Warrants and options issued for services

   

2,634,969

     

2,634,969

 

Exercise of stock options

3,333

3

3,130

     

3,133

 

Net loss

       

(27,735)

(3,708,911)

(3,736,646)

 

BALANCES AT March 31, 2019

272,530,397

$272,530

$146,137,139

-

$(209,910)

$(33,840,410)

$112,360,249

 

See accompanying notes


F-6








NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1- BUSINESS DESCRIPTION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BUSINESS DESCRIPTION:

Predictive Technology Group, Inc. together with its subsidiaries (collectively, "PTG" or the "Company") develops and commercializes discoveries and technologies involved in novel molecular diagnostic and pharmaceutical therapeutic/Human Cells, Tissues and Human Cellular and Tissue-Based Products ("HCT/Ps"). The Company uses this information as the cornerstone in the development of new diagnostics that assess a person's risk of disease and pharmaceutical therapeutics and HCT/Ps designed to effectively prevent and treat the disease.  The Company's corporate headquarters are located in Salt Lake City, Utah.

SEGMENT INFORMATION :

In accordance with ASC 280-10-50, Segment Reporting, operating Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance.  The Company operates in two reportable segments: HCT/Ps and diagnostics and therapeutics. Predictive Biotech's HCT/Ps are processed in our FDA registered lab. Our minimally manipulated tissue products are prepared utilizing proprietary extraction methods that reduce the loss of important scaffolding, growth factor and general cytokines and are intended for homologous use.  Predictive Technology's diagnostics and therapeutics uses data analytics for disease identification and subsequent therapeutic intervention through unique novel gene-based diagnostics, biotechnology treatments and companion therapeutics.

Segment revenue and operating income (loss) was as follows during the periods presented:

               

 

 

HCT/Ps

Diagnostics & Therapeutics

Total

Three months ended March 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

11,285,218

$

10,400

$

11,295,618

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

782,171

 

1,591,835

 

2,374,006

Segment operating income (loss)

 

 

694,787

 

(5,728,733)

 

(5,033,946)

Three months ended March 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

4,232,650

$

-   

$

4,232,650

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

883,751

 

264,511

 

1,148,262

Segment operating loss

 

 

(927,498)

 

(3,830,978)

 

(4,758,376)

Nine months ended March 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

30,036,056

$

10,400

$

30,046,456

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

2,295,055

 

3,780,035

 

6,075,090

Segment operating income (loss)

 

 

3,427,191

 

(13,268,072)

 

(9,840,881)

Nine months ended March 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

9,472,404

$

-

$

9,472,404

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

2,606,218

 

780,408

 

3,386,626

Segment operating loss

 

 

(1,849,920)

 

(10,775,659)

 

(12,625,579)


                   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 months ended

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 September 31,

 

 June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

2018

Segment revenues

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $                         8,063,800

 

 $              16,624,336

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

 -

 

  -






 

 

Total consolidated revenues

 $                        8,063,800

 

 $              16,624,336

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment operating income (loss)

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $                             673,003

 

 $              (5,821,549)

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                          (2,739,916)

 

                 (6,503,628)

 

 

Total consolidated operating income (loss)

 $                       (2,066,913)

 

 $            (12,325,177)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciliation of segment operating income

 

 

 

 

to income before income taxes

 

 

 

 

Segment operating income

 $                       (2,066,913)

 

 $            (12,325,177)

 

Equity method gain/(loss)

                              (314,782)

 

                     (899,950)

 

Impairment charges

 -

 

 -

 

Interest income / (expense)

                                         424

 

                       199,953

 

 

Segment income before income taxes

 $                       (2,381,271)

 

 $            (13,025,174)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


F-7








                   

 

 

Three months ended

Nine months ended

 

 

March  31,

March 31,

 

 

2019

2018

2019

2018

 

 Total operating loss for reportable segments

Total consolidated operating income (loss) 

 $(2,066,913)

 (5,033,946)

 $            (12,325,177)$

(4,758,376)

$

(9,840,881)

$

(12,625,579)

 

 Unallocated amounts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciliation of segment operating incomeLoss from equity method investment

 

 

 (193,524)

 

(22,647)

 

(1,108,423)

 

(22,647)

Interest income

 

 

1,508

 

-

 

2,420

 

199,732

Other income (expense)

 

 

1,247

 

(2,802)

 

           1,248   

 

1,000

Bargain purchase gain

 

 

272,757

 

-

 

272,757

 

-

 

to income Loss before income taxes

 

 

 (4,951,958)

 

(4,783,825)

 

(10,672,879)

 

(12,447,494)

Income tax benefit

 

 

(1,215,312)

 

(1,579,463)

 

(2,541,290)

 

(4,905,699)

Net loss

 

 

(3,736,646)

 

(3,204,362)

 

(8,131,589)

 

(7,541,795)

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

(27,735)

 

(10,946)

 

(88,858)

 

(32,837)





 

Segment operating incomeNet loss attributable to Predictive Technology Group, Inc. stockholders

 

 $(2,066,913)

 (3,708,911)

 $            (12,325,177)$

(3,193,416)

$

(8,042,731)

$

(7,508,958)

 

Equity method gain/(loss)

                              (314,782)

 

                     (899,950)

 

Impairment charges

 -

 

 -

 

Interest income / (expense)

                                         424

 

                       199,953

 

 

Segment income before income taxes

 $                       (2,381,271)

 

 $            (13,025,174)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

 

As of March 31,

 

 As of June 30,

Total Assets

 

2019

 

2018

HCT/Ps

$

  16,655,285

$

11,206,096

Diagnostics and therapeutics

 

120,723,817

 

92,781,097

Total Assets

$

137,379,102

$

103,987,193


F-5>



 

                   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 months ended

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 September 31,

 

 June 30,

Capital assets, net

2018

 

2018

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $        892,584

 

 $    438,277

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                             1,025,650

 

                       335,592

 

 

Total capital assets, net

 $      1,918,234

 

 $    773,869

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation expense

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $         37,021

 

 $     82,306

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                                   45,120

 

                          68,339

 

 

Total depreciation expense

 $         82,141

 

 $   150,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible and equity method investment assets, net

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $     7,643,543

 

 $ 8,096,311

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                        101,078,430

 

                 74,288,652

 

 

Total intangible and equity method investment assets, net

 $  108,721,973

 

 $82,384,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization expense

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $        704,445

 

 $  2,817,786

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                                884,851

 

                    1,605,103

 

 

Total amortization expense

 $     1,589,296

 

 $  4,422,889

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrants and options expense (non-cash)

 

 

 

 

Regenerative medicine products and HCT/Ps

 $          55,749

 

 $   8,216,888

 

Diagnostics and therapeutics

                                599,199

 

                    2,310,539

 

 

Total warrants and options expense (non-cash)

 $        654,948

 

 $ 10,527,427

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


F-6>



 

BASIS OF PRESENTATION:

This summary of significant accounting policies of the Company is presented to assist in understanding the financial statements.  The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company's management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity.  

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Predictive Technology Group, Inc. (the "Company" or "Predictive" or "PTG") in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for interim financial information and pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly all financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The condensed consolidated financial statements herein should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. Operating results for the 3 and 9 months ended March 31, 2019 may not necessarily be indicative of results to be expected for any other interim period or for the full year.


F-8

Fiscal Year End

The Company operates on a fiscal year basis with the fiscal year ending on June 30.

Consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Predictive Technology Group, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.  All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.  Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents.  The Company places its temporary cash investments with high-quality financial institutions.  Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $250,000. At September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2018, the Company had $548,530 and $956,139 in excess of the FDIC insured limit.

Going Concern

These financial statements were prepared on a going concern basis.  The going concern basis assumes that the Company will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.

Predictive Biotech, Inc. ("Predictive Biotech"), a subsidiary of PTG, began operations during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.   Since the inception of operations, revenues have exceeded cash expenses and such excess contributes to the overall operations of PTG.

In addition, PTG has raised sufficient capital through stock subscriptions to fund its obligations under its licenses and other agreements for the development of molecular diagnostics products under license in Predictive Therapeutics, LLC ("Predictive Therapeutics"), a subsidiary of PTG.  It is anticipated that the initial sale of such products will take place in the second half of calendar year 2018 and accelerating through the first half of calendar 2019.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount.  At the present time most sales are collected through credit cardscard payments, however from time to time, credit is granted to customers on a short-term basis without requiring collateral, and as . As such, these accounts receivable,  do not bear interest, although a finance charge may be applied to such receivables that are past due.  The Company has in place credit policies and procedures and approval process processes for sales returns and credit memos.




F-9

Inventories

Inventories consist primarily of HCT/Ps produced by Predictive Biotech.  We value inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We determine the cost of inventory using the standard- cost method, which approximates actual cost based on a first-in, first-out method.  All other costs, including administrative costs , are expensed as incurred.   

F-7



 

We analyze our inventory levels at least annually and write down inventory that has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value, or that is considered in excess of normal operating levels, as determined by management.  The related costs are recognized as cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operationsconsolidated statements of operations.

Stock Subscriptions Receivable

Stock subscriptions are recorded as contra-equity on the day the subscription agreement is signed and accepted by the Company.  All stock subscribed as of the date of these financial statements has been collected.  The stock is not issued until subscriptions subscription payments are collected.

Prepaid Expenses

Amounts paid in advance for expenses are accounted for as prepaid expenses and classified as current assets if such amounts are to be recognized as expense with the current period.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Lab equipment, furniture and computer equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method based on the lesser of estimated useful lives of the related assets or lease terms. Lab equipment items have depreciable lives of 5 years, furniture items have depreciable lives of 5 to 7 years, and computer equipment items have depreciable lives of 3 years. Repairs Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred.

Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets

Intangible and other long-lived assets are comprised of acquired patents, licenses, trade secrets and other intellectual property.  Acquired intangible assets are recorded at fair value and amortized over the shorter of the contractual life or the estimated useful life.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, such as property, equipment, and definite-lived intangibles subject to depreciation and amortization, as well as acquisition costs of subsidiaries, are reviewed for impairment annually , typically at the beginning of the fourth fiscal quarter, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.  Such events and circumstances may include sweeping regulatory changes, shifts in market demand that would negatively impact revenue, restrictions to capital markets, overall industry deterioration, dramatic increase in the number of competitors, rapidly increasing costs related to production inputs, significant changes in Company management or Company strategy, and/or significant litigation.  The Company first will assess qualitative factors above to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step impairment test to identify any impairment loss.

Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to estimated future undiscounted net cash flows , or fair value, of the related asset or group of assets over their remaining lives.  


F-10

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the converged standard on revenue recognition with the objective of providing a single, comprehensive model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability in the financial statements of companies reporting using International Financial Reporting Standards and U.S. GAAP. The standard contains principles that an entity must apply to determine the measurement of revenue and timing of when it is recognized. The underlying principle is that an entity must recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. An entity can apply the revenue standard retrospectively to each prior reporting period


presented (full retrospective method) or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application in retained earnings (modified retrospective method). 

F-8



 

The standard was effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. The Company elected to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective approach. This approach was adopted because the Company believes the new Standard has very little impact on revenue recognition for the current products sold.

The Company generates revenue by selling Human Cell and Tissue Products (HC/TP'sHCT/P's) to clinics and doctors. Revenue from these sales are recorded at the invoiced amount net of any discounts or contractual allowances. The Company has determined that the shipment of the product indicates transfer of control for revenue recognition purposes.

We have evaluated each of the five steps in Topic 606, which are as follows:

1) Identify the contract with the customer;

2) Identify the performance obligations in the contract;

3) Determine the transaction price;

4) Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and

5) Recognize revenue when (or as) performance obligations are satisfied.

Our conclusion is that we have identified similar performance obligations under ASC Topic 606 as compared with deliverables and separate units of account previously identified under the old standard. As a result, the timing of our revenue appears to remain the same in comparison to the prior revenue recognition guidance.

We sell our products through a direct sales force and through distribution in the U.S.  Revenues from these customers are recognized when all the following steps identified above have occurred.  These criteria are generally satisfied at the time of shipment when risk of loss and title passes to the customer.  We reserve for sales returns, including returns related to defective products, as a reduction in net sales, based on our historical experience.  These reserves are recorded as a reduction in net sales and are not considered material to our consolidated statements of income for 3 months ended September 30, 2018 and for the year ended June 30, 2018, which is generally when we receive confirmation that the product has been delivered.  

The Company also has significant experience with historical discount patterns and uses this experience to finalize transaction prices. In accordance with ASU 2016-12, the Company would elect elected to exclude from the measurement of transaction price, all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by the Company from a customer for e.g. sales tax, value added tax etc.  However, as our business is thus far not with the end consumer, the collection of taxes is unnecessary.(e.g. sales tax).  As we generally sell to resellers, sales taxes collected are not material.

The Company has also elected to apply the practical expedient for to not adjusting adjust revenue recognized for the effects of the time value of money. This practical expedient has been elected because the Company collects cash directly from customers immediately adjacent to upon shipment.

There are also certain considerations related to internal control over financial reporting that are associated with implementing Topic 606. We are currently evaluating our control framework for revenue recognition and identifying any changes that may need to be made in response to the new guidance. Disclosure requirements under the new guidance in Topic 606 have been significantly expanded in comparison to the disclosure requirements under the current guidance.

 

F-9



 

Shipping and Handling

We bill our customers for shipping and handling charges, which are included in net sales for the applicable period, and the corresponding shipping and handling expense is reported in cost of sales.

Research and Product Development Costs

The Company expenses research and product development costs as incurred.


F-11

Product Liability and Warranty Costs

The Company maintains product liability insurance and has not experienced any related claims from its products offerings. The Company also offers a warranty to customers providing that its products will be delivered free of any materials material defects.  There have been no material costs incurred since inception based on estimated return rates.  The Company reviews the adequacy of its recorded accrual on a quarterly basis.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded to reflect the future tax consequences attributable to the effects of differences between the carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities for financial reporting and for income tax purposes. Deferred taxes are calculated by applying enacted statutory tax rates and tax laws to future years in which temporary differences are expected to reverse. The impact on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that the rate change is enacted.  

Measurement of Fair Value

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values.  Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined in the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

F-10>




Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting periods.  Key estimates in the accompanying consolidated financial statements include, among others, revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts and product returns, provisions for obsolete inventory, valuation of long-lived assets, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances.  Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Recently Issued Financial Accounting StandardsAccounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases, by issuing Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, which requires lessees to recognize leases on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842; ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases; and ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements. The new standard establishes a right-of-use model (ROU) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the income statement.


F-12

The new standard is effective for us on July 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We expect to adopt the new standard on its effective date. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) its effective date or (2) the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the new standard for the comparative periods. We expect to adopt the new standard on July 1, 2019 and use the effective date as our date of initial application. Consequently, financial information will not be updated, and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods before July 1, 2019.

The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We expect to elect the 'package of practical expedients', which permits us not to reassess under the new standard our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. We expect to elect all of the new standard's available transition practical expedients that are applicable.

The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity's ongoing accounting. We currently expect to elect the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means, for those leases that qualify, we will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, and this includes not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. We also currently expect to elect the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of our leases.

We expect that this standard will not have a material impact on our financial statements, as we have a limited volume of operating leases that do not qualify for the short term lease exemption. We currently do not expect a significant change in our leasing activities between now and the adoption of the standard.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This update provided a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in


exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, this guidance expanded related disclosure requirements. During the first quarter of fiscal 2018, we adopted the new standard using the modified retrospective method. The adoption had no impact on the timing of the recognition of our revenue or costs. Additionally, we considered the disclosure requirements of the standard and determined that no additional disclosures were necessary.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, "Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2018-07"). ASU 2018-07 supersedes Subtopic 505-50, "Equity-Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees," and is effective for all public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than a company's adoption date of Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company early adopted ASU 2018-07 commencing January 1, 2019, with no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, "Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract." This standard aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs in a cloud computing arrangement service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred for internal-use software. The new guidance also prescribes the balance sheet, income statement and cash flow classification of the capitalized implementation costs and related amortization expense, and requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures. The Company early adopted ASU 2018-15 commencing January 1, 2019, with no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


F-13

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) ("ASU 2016-02"), which modified lease accounting for both lessees and lessors to increase transparency and comparability by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous accounting standards and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the timing of its adoption and the impact of adopting the new lease standard on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01,  Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business , which provides guidance to entities to assist with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business and provides a screen to determine when a set is not a business. Under the new guidance, when substantially all of the fair value of gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset, or group of similar assets, the assets acquired would not represent a business. Also, to be considered a business, an acquisition would have to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to produce outputs. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and should be applied on a prospective basis to any transactions occurring within the period of adoption. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual periods in which the financial statements have not been issued. We do not presently anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2017-01 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16,  Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory , which requires the recognition of the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 will be effective for us beginning on July 1, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-16 on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15,  Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments , which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 will be effective for us beginning on July 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted. We do not presently anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01,  Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,  which amends the guidance regarding the classification



and measurement of financial instruments. Changes to the current guidance primarily affect the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, ASU 2016-01 clarifies guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. ASU 2016-01 will be effective for us beginning on July 1, 2018. Early adoption is not permitted except for the provision to record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-01, an entity should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. We do not presently anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2016-01 will have a material impact on our financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17,  Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes , which will require all deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities to be presented as noncurrent within a classified balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 was effective for us as of July 1, 2017. ASU 2015-17 may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax assets and liabilities or retrospectively to all periods presented. We have elected not to early adopt ASU 2015-17. We do not anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2015-17 will have a material impact on our financial statements.

F-11



 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,  Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) , to update the financial reporting requirements for revenue recognition. Topic 606 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The guidance is based on the principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to fulfill a contract. This guidance is effective for us beginning on July 1, 2018, and entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach for the adoption of the new standard. We have evaluated the adoption of this standard on a retrospective basis and believe it will have no material impact to what has been reported.  Therefore, the Company will adopt this standard on a modified retrospective basis.

NOTE 2- NOTE 2 BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS

Predictive Therapeutics, LLC

On April 15, 2015, Global Enterprises Group, Inc. ("GLHO") acquired 100% of Predictive Therapeutics, LLC.  After the acquisition, GLHO changed its name to Predictive Technology Group, Inc.   On October 31, 2015, the initial agreement was modified to make certain technical corrections and adjustments for contingencies which were not met at that date.  The Company issued a total of 131,058,458 shares of common stock in this transaction.  Under this merger agreement, there was a change in control which has been treated for accounting purposes as a reverse recapitalization.

LifeCode Genetics, Inc.,

On November 6, 2015, the Company announced the acquisition of LifeCode Genetics, Inc. ("LifeCode") as its wholly owned subsidiary. LifeCode holds held a strategic equity investment of 10.169% in 2,792,292 units of Juneau Biosciences, LLC ("Juneau").   In addition to the development of an assay and related services for the prognosis and monitoring of endometriosis in the infertility market which the Company has licensed, Juneau is developing technologies for the diagnosis of other women's health issues.

The Company issued 6,561,870 common shares to acquire LifeCode and has recorded the with an acquisition as a Portfolio Investment with a valuation set at date fair value of $16,404,675 based on our stock price.

A share exchange agreement was entered into on September 22, 2015 that required the Company to issue to an additional 5,718,372 shares to former LifeCode former shareholders to meet the terms of the exchange agreement an additional 5,718,372 shares.  Using the OTC value (defined as the share price listed on the date of the transaction in the over-the-counter dealer markets and networks) for the additional shares issued results in an increase of value the purchase price to $30,700,605, an increase of $14,295,930.  A valuation performed by an external outside valuation expert specialist supports a September 22, 2015 value of the interest in Juneau of $16,520,150 resulting , which resulted in a day one impairment of $14,180,455. Net of the impact of the impairment, the Company recognized a deferred tax liability of $9,827,777 related to differences between book and tax basis arising from the acquisition of Lifecode.

The fair value of the purchase consideration issued to the sellers of LifeCode was allocated to the units of equity acquired, which are included in equity method investments on the consolidated balance sheets.

Juneau reports to its members on a calendar year basis and LifeCode records its distributable share of such reported income using the equity method.

SEC Rule 4-08(g) of Regulation S-X requires a registrant to disclose, in the notes to its financial statements, summarized balance sheet and income statement information of all investees on an aggregate basis, if deemed significant.  See such summaries below.  The numbers presented in the schedules below related to Juneau are audited.

F-12



 

           

Juneau Biosciences, LLC

BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

Assets

 

 

 

 

Current Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

 $          40,077

 

 $         69,718

 

Accounts receivable

 

                     -

 

                    -

 

Inventory

 

                     -

 

                    -

Total Current Assets

 

             40,077

 

            69,718

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Assets

 

     

 

Machinery & equipment

 

           742,642

 

          742,642

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

          (742,642)

 

         (742,642)

Total Fixed Assets

 

                     -

 

                    -

 

 

 

     

Other Assets

 

     

 

Patents

 

           168,476

 

          163,426

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

            (64,385)

 

           (54,673)

 

Security Deposits

 

             39,022

 

            34,922

Total Other Assets

 

           143,113

 

          143,675

 

 

 

     

Total Assets

 

 $        183,190

 

 $       213,393

 

 

 

     

Liabilities

 

     

Current Liabilities

 

     

 

Accounts Payable

 

 $          13,321

 

 $    1,049,529

 

Credit Card Payable

 

                     -

 

            18,308

 

Salary Payable

 

           898,669

 

          843,727

 

Accrued Payroll Liabilities

 

                  416

 

            32,853

 

Accrued Interest

 

           266,320

 

          860,042

 

Notes Payable

 

        1,051,968

 

       3,325,072

 

Due to related parties

 

           417,000

 

          768,968

Total Current Liabilities

 

        2,647,694

 

       6,898,499

Total Liabilities

 

        2,647,694

 

       6,898,499

 

 

 

     

Members' equity

 

     

 

34,117,912 and  28,138,878 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017and December 31, 2016, respectively Additional paid-in capital, investor capital of $26,367,947 and vested unit options of $1,998,980 on December 31, 2017, and

 

                     - 

 

                    -

 

investor capital $21,036,988, vested warrants at $4,200, and vested unit options of $1,303,074 on December 31, 2016

 

      28,366,927

 

     22,344,262

 

Retained Deficit

 

     (30,831,431)

 

    (29,029,368)

Total Members' Deficit

 

       (2,464,504)

 

      (6,685,106)

Total Liabilities and Members' Deficit

 

 $        183,190

 

 $       213,393

 

 

 

     


F-13



 

               

Juneau Biosciences, LLC

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

License Income (Related Party)

 

 $     1,005,830

 

 $         877,560

Research & Development (Related Party)

 

 $     1,350,000

 

 $                    -

Consulting (Related Party)

 

 $          88,237

 

 $                    -

 

 

 

 

  $     2,444,067

 

 $        877,560

Operating Expenses

 

 

     

 

General and administrative expenses

 

         1,855,485

 

             596,011

 

General and administrative expenses (Related Party)

 

            671,178

 

             990,021

 

Stock-based Compensation

 

            695,907

 

               71,851

 

Travel and entertainment

 

                9,064

 

                 4,654

 

Interest expense

 

         1,004,791

 

             463,558

 

Depreciation expense

 

                      -

 

                 3,377

 

Amortization expense

 

                9,711

 

                 9,575

Total Operating Expenses

 

         4,246,136

 

          2,139,047

Loss from opertions

 

        (1,802,069)

 

        (1,261,487)

Other Income (Expenses)

 

     

 

Other Income

 

                       6

   

Total Other Expenses

 

                       6

 

                      -

Net Loss before Income Taxes

 

        (1,802,063)

 

        (1,261,487)

Income Tax Benefit

 

                      -

 

                      -

Net Loss

 

 $    (1,802,063)

 

 $    (1,261,487)

Net Loss per Common Unit

 

 $             (0.06)

 

 $             (0.05)

 

 

 

 

     

Weighted Average Number of Common Units Outstanding

 

       29,341,866

 

        27,782,968

 

 

 

 

 

   


F-14



 

ReNovo Biotech, Inc.

On March 28, 2016, the Company announced the acquisition of ReNovo Biotech, Inc. as its wholly owned subsidiary.  The acquisition provides the Company access to ReNovo Biotech's cellular, tissue, biomaterial and regenerative medicine products and product candidates. This subsidiary is operated under the name Predictive Biotech, Inc. The Company issued 9,500,000 common shares to effect the acquisition , which is was recorded at a cost fair value of $14,087,000. The fair value of the trade secrets was determined to approximate the value of the common stock paid as consideration. The Company also recognized deferred tax liabilities and goodwill of $5,254,451.

The purchase price was allocated to "trade secrets" including protocols to develop an amniotic allografts and umbilical cord allograft line of products in accordance with the provisions of ASC 805, Business Combinations .  Such trade secrets were determined to be recognizable apart from any form of goodwill and are "technology-based".

Aggregate amortization expense for the 3 months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, was approximately and $704,446, and $850,116 respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for the developed technology consists of the following as of September 30, 2018:

     

Year Ending June 30

 

 

2019

 

   2,817,786

2020

 

   2,817,786

2021

 

   2,460,739

 

 

 


Inception DX, LLC

On August 22, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement captioned "Securities Purchase Agreement" with the members of Inception DX, LLC ("Inception"), a Utah limited liability company. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company acquired Inception for 15,500,000 shares of common stock. Inception owns laboratory equipment, partial interest in database records for over 31,900,000 individuals for use in genetics research, 400,000 units in Juneau Biosciences, LLC, initial CLIA registration, CLIA lab protocols, and other assets. Once the CLIA registration is completed, Inception will be used as a CLIA -certified laboratory by Predictive Technology Group, Inc. and its affiliates.


F-14

F-15



 

The stock issued was for cash, laboratory equipment, membership units in Juneau Biosciences, LLC units ("Juneau units"), and trade secrets related to the DNA database and protocols related to a future laboratory use as a CLIA lab.  The cash was valued at face value.  The Juneau units was were valued based on the valued value assigned when the Company entered into a subscription to purchase units of Juneau ($1.10 per unit).  The laboratory equipment was valued at market value as it had not been used and the Company is aware of the approximate market purchase price.  It will be classified as equipment with a 5-year lifeprice of similar equipment.  The equipment will be depreciated over 5 years.  The proprietary data, DNA library, protocols, research and methods are classified as a trade secret in our industry.  Therefore, the Company determined to allocate the remaining value of the assets purchased as a trade secret with a 15-year lifetrade secrets in our industry.  The Company will amortize the trade secrets over an estimated useful life of 15 years.   

The stock price on 8/22/August 22, 2018 was $0.92/share.  Indicating  per share, indicating a purchase price of $14,260,000 requiring allocation:

 

     

·-

Cash

$799,980

 

 

 

·-

Lab equipment

700,000

 

 

 

·-

Investment in minority interest

440,000

 

 

 

·-

Trade secrets

12,320,00012,320,020

 

 

 

 

        Total Purchase Price

$14,260,000

 

The financial statements presented above reflect the increase of this minority interest investment.  The 400,000 units acquired in this acquisition increased our ownership less than 1%, and as such, the Company has not acquired more than 50% of Juneau, in total, as of September 30March 31, 2018 2019.  The $440,000 allocated to Investment in Minority Interest is was offset in the period of acquisition by our estimated share of the loss in Juneau's operations losses incurred by Juneau for the quarter ended September 30, 2018.

F-16




Taueret Laboratories, LLC Asset Purchase

On August 22, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement captioned "Asset Purchase Agreement" (the "Purchase Agreement") with Taueret Laboratories, LLC and its members. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued warrants exercisable for 16,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The warrants were exercisable at fair market value of the Company's common stock on the closing date. In consideration for the warrants, the Company acquired (i) approximately 1,000 degenerative disc disease related DNA samples, related family records, relevant clinical records (including approximately 600 affected probands) and 800 ancestry matched control samples, (ii) whole exome sequencing data on approximately 300 degenerative disc disease samples, over 800 local controls, and published reference populations, together with initial analysis of the markers, (iii) project plan, study paperwork, promotional study and materials used in the research study, (iv) exclusive use of a DNA biobank that has a collection of over 300,000 samples for multiple diseases that the Company may target, (v) the remaining interest in database records for over 31,900,000 individuals for use in genetics research, and (vi) other assets.

The warrants issued are for proprietary data and methods that are otherwise a trade secret in our industry.  Therefore, the Company determined to classify the assets purchased as trade secrets with a 15-year life.  The Company ran used a Black Scholes calculation to determine valuation of the warrants to determine assign the purchase price of $15,160,38513,860,000.


F-15

The fair value of the warrants was determined using the following inputs to the Black Scholes model:

       

Risk-free interest rate

 

2.7%

 

Expected dividend yield

 

0%

 

Expected life (in years)

 

 5.0

 

Expected volatility

 

150%

 

 

Expected volatility was calculated from the historical volatility of the Company's common stock.

Regenerative Medical Technologies, Inc.

On December 19, 2018 the Company executed a merger with the shareholders of Regenerative Medical Technologies, Inc. ("RMT"), a Utah corporation. The Company acquired RMT for 10,000,000 shares of common stock. RMT holds various assets including (i) models, methods and protocols for collection birthing tissue and DNA samples, (ii) patient registry models, methods and protocols to collect clinical outcomes and electronic medical records, and (iii) designs and methodologies relating to many initiatives that are complementary to anticipated product offerings and ongoing research, and (iv) other assets.

The stock price on the date of acquisition of $0.92 indicated fair value of common stock paid as consideration of $9,200,000. In addition, the Company recognized a deferred tax liability of $3,066,667 related to the differences between book and tax basis arising from the acquisition, resulting in a total purchase price of $12,066,667. The Company determined that the assets acquired qualify for treatment as trade secrets within industry.  The trade secrets will be amortized over an estimated useful life of 10 years.  

Aggregate amortization expense for the 3 and 9 months ended March 31, 2019 was $289,473, and $385,965 respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for the assets consists of the following as of March 31, 2019:

       

Year Ending June 30

 

 

 

2019

 

$

   289,473

2020

 

 

1,226,667

2021

 

 

1,226,667





2022

 

 

1,226,667

2023

 

 

1,226,667

Thereafter

 

 

6,684,562

Taueret Laboratories, LLC Acquisition

On March 22, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of Taueret Laboratories, LLC ("Taueret") pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement (as amended, the "Purchase Agreement"), dated January 1, 2019. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding units of Taueret. The Company and its affiliates plan to use Taueret's CLIA-certified laboratory to perform diagnostic testing services.


F-16

The Purchase Agreement also specifies that the Company may, at its sole discretion, put certain patents related to the diagnosis and treatment of Preeclampsia (the "Preeclampsia IP") back to the members of Taueret at any time prior to December 31, 2020 (the "Preeclampsia Option"). On June 30, 2020, an additional payment $8,547,000 in cash will become due if the Company has not exercised the Preeclampsia Option. After considering the relevant accounting guidance, we determined that the Preeclampsia Option was not part of the business combination with Taueret, because the Preeclampsia Option was included in the Purchase Agreement and structured primarily to benefit the acquirer.

The Company acquired Taueret and the Preeclampsia Option for total consideration of $931,817, net of cash acquired of $85,964. The consideration was paid as 552,995 shares of the Company's common stock. The common stock was valued at the closing price on the date of the closing of the merger, adjusted for a 20% discount for lack of marketability related to a contractually stipulated lockup provision with a period of one year. The consideration was allocated between the business combination and the Preeclampsia Option on a relative fair value basis with $917,511 allocated to the business combination and $100,000 allocated to the Preeclampsia Option. The Preeclampsia Option was recorded in intangible assets and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the period the option is exercisable.

Total consideration transferred was allocated to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as of the acquisition date.  

Management estimated the fair value of tangible and intangible assets and liabilities in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance for business combinations and utilized the services of third-party valuation consultants.  These amounts are provisional and may be adjusted during the measurement period, which expires no later than one year from the acquisition date, if new information is obtained that, if known, would have affected the amounts recognized as of the acquisition date:

     

 

Assets:

Fair Value

Current assets

$

663,262

Laboratory equipment

190,397

Software

239,000

Intangible Assets

311,000

Total assets acquired

1,403,659

Liabilities:

 

Accrued liabilities

(68,181)

Capital lease obligation

(54,291)

Deferred tax liabilities

(90,919)

Total liabilities assumed

(213,391)

Bargain purchase gain

(272,757)

Total fair value of purchase price

$

917,511

Consideration allocated to Preeclampsia Option

 

100,000

Total consideration

$

1,017,511





Less: Cash acquired

 

(85,964)

Total consideration transferred

$

931,817


F-17

 Identifiable intangible assets

The Company acquired intangible assets that consisted of an internally developed laboratory information management system which had an estimated fair value of $239,000, CLIA regulatory licenses with a fair value of $295,000, and customer relationships with a fair value of $16,000. The fair value of the software was determined using the replacement cost method.  The fair value of the CLIA licenses were estimated using the excess earnings method. The estimated net cash flows were discounted using a discount rate of 22%, which is based on the estimated internal rate of return for the acquisition and represents the rate that market participants might use to value the intangible assets. The projected cash flows were based on key assumptions such as estimates of revenues and operating profits. The Company will amortize the intangible assets on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 15 years for the CLIA license and 5 years for the software and customer relationships. This amortization is deductible for income tax purposes.  

Bargain purchase gain

Any excess of fair value of acquired net assets over the purchase price (negative goodwill) has been recognized as a gain in the period the acquisition was completed. We have reassessed whether all acquired assets and assumed liabilities have been identified and recognized and performed remeasurements to verify that the consideration paid, assets acquired, and liabilities assumed have been properly valued. The remaining excess has been recognized as a gain in other income and expense in the consolidated statement of operations. The bargain purchase gain partly resulted from the allocation of the total consideration between the business combination and the Preeclampsia Option. We also believe we were able to negotiate a bargain price due to the desire of the sellers to induce the Company to purchase the Preeclampsia Option contemporaneously with the business combination.

Pro forma information

The unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the Taueret acquisition as if it had been consummated as of July 1, 2017, with adjustments to give effect to pro forma events that are directly attributable to the acquisition which includes adjustments related to the amortization of acquired intangible assets and elimination of transactions related to laboratory services between the Company and Taueret. These unaudited pro forma results are presented for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of operation of the combined company would have been if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the period presented nor are they indicative of future results of operations and are not necessarily indicative of results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of July 1, 2017.

 

             

 

 

3 Months

Ended

March 31, 2019

9 Months

Ended

March 31, 2019

Year

ended

June 30, 2018

Revenue

 

$ 11,544,461

$

31,872,749

$

19,670,014

Loss from operations

 

(5,094,701)

 

(9,819,378)

 

(12,646,122)

Net loss

 

(3,979,401)

 

(8,110,086)

 

(6,381,045)


F-18

 

To complete the purchase transaction, the Company incurred immaterial acquisition costs, which were recorded as general and administrative expense.  The post-acquisition operations of Taueret did not materially impact the consolidated statement of operations for the 3 and 9 month periods ended March 31, 2019.

NOTE 3-  INVENTORIES

         




 

Period ended 

 As of

 

Year endedAs of

 

September 30, 

 March 31,

 

June 30,

 

2018 

 2019

 

2018

Finished goods

 $2,308,082

 2,814,310

 $

 $     1,621,745

Work-in-process

    1,059,063 

 844,966

 

       2,148,989

Shipping supplies

          16,510 

 23,382

 

              20,640

Total inventory on hand

 $3,383,655

 3,682,658

 $

 $   3,791,374

F-17



 

NOTE 4-  PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET

         

 

Period ended 

 As of

 

Year endedAs of

 

September 30, 

 March 31,

 

June 30,

 

2018 

 2019

 

2018

Computer equipment

 254,464

         384,511

 $

 $         154,132

Furniture

               36,942 

         202,389

 

             36,942

Lab equipment

         1,341,907 

      2,253,825

 

          504,203

Software

 

       560,881

 

   -

Leasehold improvements

 

        500,894

 

                     -

Other fixed assets in progress

            523,920 

         989,474

 

          234,460

Capital leases

 

     2,731,312

 

-

  Total property, plant, and equipment

 $     2,157,233 

      7,623,286

 

 $         929,737

 

 

 

 

 

Less accumulated depreciation

          (238,999) 

       (515,648)

 

        (155,867)

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 $1,918,234

      7,107,638

 $

 $      773,870

 

 

 

 


F-19

Depreciation expense for the 3 month periods ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $149,776 and $40,960, respectively. Depreciation expense for the 9 month periods ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $358,729 and $64,719, respectively.

 

NOTE 5-  INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Predictive Technology Group, Inc. through its subsidiary Predictive Therapeutics, LLC has a number of patents and license agreements categorized under "Intellectual Property" and "Licenses Agreements."

License Agreements with Juneau

Intangible assets primarily consist of amortizable assets of purchased licenses, patents, and trade secrets.  The following summarizes the amounts reported as intangible assets:

 

               

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

Amount

Amortization

Net

At March 31, 2019:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Licenses

 

$

17,511,314

$

(2,443,910)

$

15,067,404

Patents

 

 

10,059,511

 

(2,708,384)

 

7,351,127

Trade Secrets

 

 

52,533,686

 

(9,687,463)

 

42,846,223

Other

 

 

411,000

 

-

 

411,000

Total intangible assets

 

$

80,515,511

$

(14,839,757)

$

65,675,754

 

               

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

Amount

Amortization

Net

At June 30, 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Licenses

 

$

21,960,525

$

(997,905)

$

20,962,620





Patents

 

 

9,896,050

 

(2,134,863)

 

7,761,187

Trade Secrets

 

 

14,087,000

 

(5,990,689)

 

8,096,311

Total intangible assets

 

$

45,943,575

$

(9,123,457)

$

36,820,118


F-20

Total amortization expense for the 3 months ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018, was $2,224,230 and $1,107,302 respectively. Amortization expense for 9 months ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018, was $6,075,090 and $3,321,907 respectively. We did not record any impairment charges during the 9 months ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018.

Endometriosis license

Subsequently, on On December 28, 2016, Predictive Therapeutics and Juneau amended and restated the license agreement dated July 9, 2015.  The amended license fees associated with this agreement required minimum monthly payments of $100,000 through April 2017. Beginning in May 2017, minimum monthly payments of $120,000 were required through August 2017, and subsequent payments of $500,000 for the next four consecutive months.  The term of the license is for a term ending at the last expired claim equal to the life of the licensed patents. In the event of a default, either party may terminate the agreement (i) thirty days after the party who is in material breach receives notice of the breach from the non-breaching party where (ii) the breaching party fails to cure the breach during said thirty-day period.  Additionally, the Company issued additional warrants and stock for the license (see Note 7) in order to finalize a subscription agreement.  This amounted to $18,159,211, in total value, issued in March of 2018.

F-18



 

An additional license fee of $2,000,000 is due and payable once the Company has received profits of $25,000,000 related to the intellectual property licensed under the agreement.

Upon first commercial sale of the licensed assay, the Company will issue Juneau common shares with a market value of $2,500,000.  Net sales, once commercially available, are split evenly by the Company and Juneau after deducting the cost of the lab test fees, Juneau is entitled to a royalty equal to 50% of net sales, adjusted to exclude certain costs and fees, and subject to certain minimums.

In March of 2018, the Company's licenses with Juneau were amended to reduce the royalty rate and expand the scope of the licenses to include the entire field of endometriosis and pelvic pain in consideration for the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock and warrants exercisable for 14,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.80 per share.

In December of 2018 the Company and Juneau agreed to renegotiate the price paid for the license.  The warrants issued initially for this license agreement were cancelled, and a new round of warrants was issued with an increased exercise price of $0.90 per share, resulting in a decrease in the value assigned to the license agreement of approximately $4,449,211.  There was an associated adjustment to amortization expense. The fair value of the replacement warrants were determined using the following inputs to the Black Scholes model:

       

Risk-free interest rate

 

2.7%